Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

[Lurkette]

Imagine trying to talk about shit seriously on Kiwi Farms go back to reddit.

Imagine having a discussion about a cow anf the person their interacting with, in their own thread, on a site dedicated to discussing cows in their own threads, instead of shitting up everything with memes and a-logging

Seriously, to the people mocking the Jim critiques, I love Metokur but he's not above criticism. Hes not the almighty kek incarnate, he's a fuck on the internet like the rest of us. He does tend to overlook things, then u-turn the conversation into a joke when its pointed out. I remember he tweeted about a California law that would ensure child prostitutes wouldnt be charged, and made it out like it was legalizing child prostitution. When someone linked him the snopes article, he replied by @ing the snopes dude with his...divorce? document? I forget what legal document it was, but he asked him to debunk that. Best example I have off the top of my head, but it wasn't a one time thing.

 

[Trash Eater]

For those of you keeping score at home:

 

[Love Machine]

Imagine having a discussion about a cow anf the person their interacting with, in their own thread, on a site dedicated to discussing cows in their own threads, instead of shitting up everything with memes and a-logging

Seriously, to the people mocking the Jim critiques, I love Metokur but he's not above criticism. Hes not the almighty kek incarnate, he's a fuck on the internet like the rest of us. He does tend to overlook things, then u-turn the conversation into a joke when its pointed out. I remember he tweeted about a California law that would ensure child prostitutes wouldnt be charged, and made it out like it was legalizing child prostitution. When someone linked him the snopes article, he replied by @ing the snopes dude with his...divorce? document? I forget what legal document it was, but he asked him to debunk that. Best example I have off the top of my head, but it wasn't a one time thing.

Well that's actually something to go on. Most of the critiques have been faggy projecting or regurgitating skeptic insults. Literally shit straight of /v/ and /b/

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Do you mean when the folder was originally spotted?

yes

 

[Bob Barker]

Also saying that all politicians are dumb and boomers... what the hell?!

He really wants to fit in with them.

 

[ConcernedCitizen]

So, make your debts guys, what will replace the Liberalists and Altright when they finally die like atheism+?

What is the next stage of :autism:?

 

[Persepolis]

Do you think Sargon chuckles out of fear the same way soyboys have the fear grimace?

 

[soy_king]

Are you sure it was for "diddling kids" and not just because he was a self admitted schizophrenic with bloodlust who fantasied about hurting people and was also a pedophile who worked at a school?

And how exactly does that invalidate my point that Jim could've done it himself, rather than implying that his viewers report him instead? I'm treating your omission of the other point in my post as tacit agreement that I'm right, and he does the same shit he accuses the Soyfather of doing.

I think you're right that people here probably give Jim a pass because they like him, but really there isn't much that can be done about that. The majority of the posts I've seen don't seem to be outright defending Jim so much as mocking Carl though. This is his thread after all, so really it's supposed to be primarily focused on his side of things.

Personally, I still don't dislike Carl, don't think that he's a bad person, and don't have any wish to see him fail. And honestly, I don't quite understand why so many people here seem to hate him with such a passion. However, he's acting so butthurt right now that it's not hard to see why everyone is preoccupied with mocking him for it. He said during the TL;DR video that Jim has been begging for his attention for months. He's probably right, but the fact that he knows this should tell him not to give in. To be clear, I do agree with you that Jim is an asshole and deserves to be called out more, though I'm not sure how relevant that is in the context of this thread.

You're also right that Carl is a moron if he thought that he had any chance of "winning" this as well. Most of his own fanbase probably don't give a shit about any of this e-drama, and most of the people that do engage in this type of drama like or are at least sympathetic to Jim. They're unlikely to give him credit for anything he says even if it is valid. Hopefully the 1.2k subs he lost so far send him the message and he makes the sensible decision of ending this shit, leaving it behind, and never doing anything like this again.

You're definitely right that this is Carl's thread, but that hasn't stopped us from talking about tangentially related topics before. In this case, I don't think most of the cows we talk about are bad people, but I do believe Jim is, and I'm prepared to get crucified for blaspheming against the Patron Saint of the Farms.

Jim always begs for attention; it's his primary MO. And as I've said before, Carl is an absolute moron for falling for it. Both of their streams were utter garbage, and this bitchfit among GenXrs is nothing more than sad. I honestly think Carl's problem is his presentation; most of what he says isn't wrong, but it's so couched in self roghteousness and arrogance that it turns people away. Jim, on the other hand, uses his "devil may care" edgy teenager shtick to endear himself to shitposters, despite the fact that he's old enough to be a large chunk of his audience's dad. In the end, it's not about who's right; it's about who conveys their message better, and in this autistic corner of the internet, Jim is the Kaiser.

We get it matt, you hate jim and you are butthurt because we dont share the same feeling toward jim, now go search for a boulder or something

Dammit you got me again! It's too bad my IP address isn't in Oregon, but yeah I'm clearly running 24 hour ops for the septics. It's not as if I've made it clear how much I regard Jim as an oversensitive nihilistic faygut who gets way too much of a free pass. Guess I'll go collect some boulders and defend Maddox.

 

[wellthathappened]

@soy_king

There must be a reason why you continue doing this to yourself.

 

[LN 910]

Dammit you got me again! It's too bad my IP address isn't in Oregon,

Nigga you don't own a VPN?

 

[dick_phelps]

Soyking is either Mundanematt or Bryan

 

[Cromagnon]

So does anybody want to guess what conditions Jim would have to sign up to when he and sagtits fight?

Free nacho samplers? No teens in the audience?

 

[soy_king]

@soy_king

There must be a reason why you continue doing this to yourself.

It's mostly because I really dislike Jim. If you're autistic enough to go through my dislikes, you'll find that about 99% of them have something to do with him.

Nigga you don't own a VPN?

Hahhahahaha touche. I don't know how I can respond to that.

Soyking is either Mundanematt or Bryan

Please. I'd like to think I'm more eloquent and present more cogent arguments than either of them.

 

[Lysol]

It's mostly because I really dislike Jim.

You could've saved everyone a lot of reading and yourself a lot of effort to just say that. We get it, you dislike the guy, you don't have to try to justify it to the whole world.

 

[Cromagnon]

Oh dear, Sargoy is haemorrhaging 12 year olds

 

[soy_king]

You could've saved everyone a lot of reading and yourself a lot of effort to just say that. We get it, you dislike the guy, you don't have to try to justify it to the whole world.

I (EDIT: implied that I) did. If you choose to go back (god knows why you'd want to), you'll notice I only brought up my grievances when prompted.

 

[beardedgoat]

Jim, on the other hand, uses his "devil may care" edgy teenager shtick to endear himself to shitposters, despite the fact that he's old enough to be a large chunk of his audience's dad.

Internet nihilism is a hell of a drug.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Personally, I still don't dislike Carl, don't think that he's a bad person, and don't have any wish to see him fail. And honestly, I don't quite understand why so many people here seem to hate him with such a passion. However, he's acting so butthurt right now that it's not hard to see why everyone is preoccupied with mocking him for it. He said during the TL;DR video that Jim has been begging for his attention for months. He's probably right, but the fact that he knows this should tell him not to give in. To be clear, I do agree with you that Jim is an asshole and deserves to be called out more, though I'm not sure how relevant that is in the context of this thread.

I personally don't get the kind of Sargon/"Soygoy" Derangement Syndrome certain groups on the Internet (including Kiwi Farms) seem to have, or the hyperbolic hyper-hatred the Skeptic/Anti-SJW YouTuber Community in general seems to illicit from those same groups. After all, the Skeptics may fuck up many times, but a rational person would know that it doesn't even vaguely necessarily make their arguments invalid.

Like with Carl's adamantine, unwavering, uncompromising stance on Liberalism. One would say that it's stupid, unless you do research on what Liberalism, and then you understand why he doesn't waver from it, because, in his understanding (and mine), Liberalism is the bedrock of modern Western civilization, culture, and society.

And who would go against that?

Concerning Jim(81Jim)/The Internet Aristocrat/Mister Metokur, I certainly don't belief that he is some sacred cow or saint that is somehow immune to criticism. Being able to mock idiocy does not stop one from being idiotic oneself. Now, I do not care about what topic Jim targets on any given video, because Jim is not my personal attack dog against things I dislike. I do care about his personal behavior and how that affects the quality of his content (separating art and artist can only go so far).

In fact, I think I'll do a bit of research on Jim, going through his Internet history, his content, and his worst, most autistic, most spergtastic moments, and put them all in a Content Cop style video. Or text post. Or just keep them to myself until the time is right.

 

[Nobunaga]

I personally don't get the kind of Sargon/"Soygoy" Derangement Syndrome certain groups on the Internet (including Kiwi Farms) seem to have, or the hyperbolic hyper-hatred the Skeptic/Anti-SJW YouTuber Community in general seems to illicit from those same groups. After all, the Skeptics may fuck up many times, but a rational person would know that it doesn't even vaguely necessarily make their arguments invalid.

Like with Carl's adamantine, unwavering, uncompromising stance on Liberalism. One would say that it's stupid, unless you do research on what Liberalism, and then you understand why he doesn't waver from it, because, in his understanding (and mine), Liberalism is the bedrock of modern Western civilization, culture, and society.

And who would go against that?

Concerning Jim(81Jim)/The Internet Aristocrat/Mister Metokur, I certainly don't belief that he is some sacred cow or saint that is somehow immune to criticism. Being able to mock idiocy does not stop one from being idiotic oneself. Now, I do not care about what topic Jim targets on any given video, because Jim is not my personal attack dog against things I dislike. I do care about his personal behavior and how that affects the quality of his content (separating art and artist can only go so far).

In fact, I think I'll do a bit of research on Jim, going through his Internet history, his content, and his worst, most autistic, most spergtastic moments, and put them all in a Content Cop style video. Or text post. Or just keep them to myself until the time is right.

Good luck on your useless search seeing as how habermann nuked by proxy everything related to jim by proxy
But if you want to waste your time trying to expose jim to become the new don, be my guest

 

[Berrakh]

Oh my God, the Teal Deer video is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen. Literally everything he accuses Teal Deer of is emotional and true about himself.

And there are so many times where he will say “I’m not arrogant” and then immediately talk about how great he is. Usually by trashing UKIP too