Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, the accusation I find the most serious is one that no one talks about much because it's been swallowed up by the circus. Supposedly Kavanaugh has a well-known habit of hiring women based on their attractiveness and willingness to dress "casually".
If that's true (and let's underline that "if" about a dozen times), I'd consider that a major concern because he was acting in his professional capacity as a judge on the second-highest court in the nation. He'd be bringing unprofessional attitudes about women into the workplace he runs, and not approaching his job with the seriousness it deserves.
But - we'll probably never hear anything about this again because everyone's too busy going through the Kavanaughs' Barb Chandler-esque hoard trying to pin down just when Li'l Brett went to see Leonard Bearstein.
If I remember right, the quote was along the lines of women who "have a certain look" to them. I don't recall any aide saying that it was regarding their attractiveness, but may more have been how they presented themselves or stood. I think the MSM took that and spun it to mean he surrounded himself with pretty ladies because he's a pervert, but then you have his female aides standing up for him saying he was a gentlemen and great mentor. So I'm pretty sure he just went for people based on their personality and how they carried it.

But I haven't really heard anything since about it, maybe something changed... but I doubt it all the same.
 
Men get hired based on their looks too it should be pointed out. Depending on the job, how you style your hair, what knot you use on the tie, quality of the shoes etc etc etc can have a big impact on whether you get the job or not. A professor teaching her students how to present the proper appearance to land a super sweet internship that will set their careers at the start is doing her job correctly.
 
Ah. I was wondering why outlets like The Guardian (Here's the current article, but here's the Google result. They removed a sentence.) had kept omitting Julie Swetnick's connection to New York Life in all of the articles they were writing about her. She didn't even have it listed on her online resume anywhere, because like all the other accusers: Their social media and internet presence was virtually scrubbed completely clean before they "stepped forwards." It seems like they missed a spot when the Google results didn't quite get the memo in time.

Julie Swetnick sued New York Life over a sexual-harassment complaint about a decade ago, and her lawyer representing her in the case was Debra Katz. Ford's lawyer. The same Debra Katz who once told Paula Jones that she didn't have a case against Bill Clinton. Turns out that this picture wasn't Katz, that's just Barbara Kinny, but wouldn't you know it, there was a much more interesting connection anyways.

Small fuckin' world, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Also, no one in this thread has said that all accusations of a similar nature are unlikely to be true. They are simply stating that there are absolutely zero negative repercussions for lying about being raped in today's social climate, so it makes it more difficult to believe rape accusations right away. We know that some women lie about rape, but we're not so stupid as to think that all women lie about rape. It sounds like you're just projecting you're life experience onto this and getting too caught up in that instead of reading what people are saying.

Thankfully after the CPS and Police fucked up several times last year, nearly jailing people who were completely innocent due to psychotic bitches caught up in mistaking the UK for the USA they have since been pursuing anyone making false claims rather aggressively. Here in the UK you can be charged for various things such as perverting the course of justice and wasting police time both of which face jail time and the rather public statement that "You're a psychotic liar" so mainstream society won't touch you with a barge pole. Doesn't stop moronic press pieces from the niche blogsites saying how evil it is people who wasted police time, tax payers money and tried to destroy innocent people's lives is "wrong" though.

End result is 23% conviction rate drop because the CPS and Police have to do their fucking job properly or enjoy being dragged through the courts on compensation claims.

The US clearly needs similar charges, or to begin applying those charges more aggressively if they are available.

Actually, the accusation I find the most serious is one that no one talks about much because it's been swallowed up by the circus. Supposedly Kavanaugh has a well-known habit of hiring women based on their attractiveness and willingness to dress "casually".

Based on looks, ok I can see. We all have little biases we don't really "know" but dressing casually suggests he wanted them to feel comfortable while in the work place and not stuck in pants suits and dresses all the damn time. If someone tells me "casual dress code" that means that unless I am in a court house I can ditch the stuffy suits and be comfy to get shit done.

Which seems to chime with the testimony of all of the interns and other female employees he's had and how good he was as a mentor and boss. He let his staff be comfortable.
 
the man going on to have a long, successful career in the US judicial system, with no one saying jack shit until he's being interviewed for the Supreme Court
This point can't be made enough. Kavanaugh was one of those appointments that presidents make that are clearly setting someone up to be a future Supreme Court nominee. The Democrats knew that when Bush appointed him and fought tooth-and-nail against him, where the fuck was all this 10 years ago?
 
This point can't be made enough. Kavanaugh was one of those appointments that presidents make that are clearly setting someone up to be a future Supreme Court nominee. The Democrats knew that when Bush appointed him and fought tooth-and-nail against him, where the fuck was all this 10 years ago?

That's only while Hitler Bush was in charge. Not Hyper Giga Hitler Trump and the Neo Nazi Dudebro whypipo.
 
It's been hinted at several times, but I"d like to add my .02

The very person who will probably sit in judgement of the fairness of Title IX disciplinary courts where innocent people have been demonstrably punished for crimes that never happened because of weaponized cries of victimhood being treated as more important than evidence and the burden of proof has been shifted to the defendant who simply must be guilty of something as a man is now himself being bombarded with weaponized cries of victimhood that are being treated as more important than evidence and is being expected to prove it didn't happen, which he can't do, he's a man, he must've done it....
 
I'm putting this here with no comment:

nokav.jpg

http://archive.is/xihyC
 
In the confirmation hearings we have been treated to insane women sperging out all over the senate floor for, senators sperging out on the senate floor, claims a mexican jew is a neonazi, prophesies of handmades tail becoming real, "comedians" running around like their hair is on fire, and general pussyhatery. Also, nothing the FBI dug up on any of his 6 background checks in which they do talk to past and present associates brought aby of this up.

TFW you can no longer tell the difference between this and actual CSPAN.
 
where the fuck was all this 10 years ago?
well you see, it's because ten years ago, nobody was brave or woke enough to speak out about the rape culture inherent to the patriarchal society we live in. These women knew they'd not be taken seriously but with #metoo now all of our female comrades must be given the respect they deserve or you'll be publicly humiliated (Inshallah) so the confidence that we all helped cultivate in them helped jog their inferior female memories.

Yeah, I think that's it
 
Screen shot 2018-09-27 at 7.17.49 AM.png

I don't know who that guy there is, but I dunno, this can be hilariously taken out of context.

EDIT: Feinstein's bringing up the Clarence Thomas hearings.
 
Last edited:
Ford's now testifying. I'm not gonna lie, her voice threw me off-guard because I could've sworn she had the voice of a chain smoker just based on how she looks.

Lol she's choking up already.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: heathercho
I can't believe Feinstein wants an actual investigation of Avenatti's client. What do Clarence Thomas and "The Year of the Woman" have to do with anything? Meanwhile Ford looks like she's having a panic attack. Look at her breathing and her eyes, I guess trying to torpedo a Supreme Court justice is very stressful. I wonder if she'll ask for an early recess and not return. I'm surprised she showed up and I'll be shocked if she stays for the whole shebang. If she gets some hard questions from the prosecutor there's going to be a lot of "I don't recall".
 
Lol I like how according to her there apparently was already music playing by the time she was pushed into the room. That amuses me for some reason.

EDIT: "Pinballing off the walls".

EDIT 2: What the fuck is a second front door, anyway? At least where I come from, we call that the "screen door". Who shoots down putting in a screen door?
 
Very early, but here's where you can find the live testimony tomorrow:
Watching the stream. Ford was saying that Kavanaugh assaulted and almost raped her when drunk, while others watched.

It "drastically" changed her life because it was oh-so-traumatic.

"I remember saying that the boy who raped me could one day be a member of the U.S. Supreme Court." - Christine Ford

Who the fuck thinks this?

Edit:

"My email was hacked to send out messages recanting my story." - Christine Ford

"My responsibility is to tell you the truth." - Christine Ford
 
Last edited:
Back