Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing keeps running through my mind watching this entire fiasco. That is the assumption that "No woman would lie about this! These must be taken serriously!" Uh huh. Because false rape allegations have never ever been used to maintain political and social power in this nations history? Emmett Till would bed to disagree, if he hadn't been lynched following a false Rape accusation. For some reaon nobody remembers that the "Great American Novel" arguably the most defining piece of American Literature of the 20th Century, was about a woman falsely accusing a man of rape without, and the events that sprang from that. To Kill a Mockingbird. written by a woman. Isn't it remarkable how the Left always returns to the same toolsets? And yet people forget they were the Klan.

Accusing people you don't like of being a sex pervert is a time-honored tactic thousands of years old. Remember in the Bible with the story of Joseph and Potiphar's wife? It's not just rape either, look at all the politicians in Muslim/African shitholes who get thrown in jail by the leaders of those countries for "sodomy" and other crimes like that. Pedophilia too, like the Satanic abuse shit, Q-Anon, Pizzagate, maybe Michael Jackson (assuming he really was innocent), etc.
 
The GOP trying to keep mark judge
from testifying makes them look really guilty. The consensus, even in republican media, is that she is believable, and that it's a bad idea for the nomination to go forward. The difference between her plain honesty vs, for instance, the Clinton Benghazi hearing is jarring. If she's pushing an agenda other than "I remember this happened" she's doing a bad job.

I was saying in chat earlier, how I’m at work in my office with the door closed. Everyone but me seems to be watching it, and I can hear this idiots cheering. I have no idea why they would cheer, but that combined with these tweets create a very uneasy sensation in my stomach.
Jesus please don't tell me this political smear job is gonna work/working. Is the (((Republican Media Elite))) really pushing for her to be telling the truth that hard?
 
hippo.png

Hot off the presses
 
One thing keeps running through my mind watching this entire fiasco. That is the assumption that "No woman would lie about this! These must be taken serriously!" Uh huh. Because false rape allegations have never ever been used to maintain political and social power in this nations history? Emmett Till would bed to disagree, if he hadn't been lynched following a false Rape accusation. For some reaon nobody remembers that the "Great American Novel" arguably the most defining piece of American Literature of the 20th Century, was about a woman falsely accusing a man of rape without, and the events that sprang from that. To Kill a Mockingbird. written by a woman. Isn't it remarkable how the Left always returns to the same toolsets? And yet people forget they were the Klan.

It's always funny how people like to say we improved but we haven't, in fact it has actually gotten worse. Back then the saying was "Niggers are always guilty of rape", now it's "Women should always be believed in rape accusations". Back then, if the Scottsboro boys were White, they would have been found innocent just like they should have. Nowadays they would have to go through the same Kangaroo Court.
 
View attachment 552384
Here come the crocodile tears an hour-and-a-half too late.
:crocodile:

She's going to start crying now they are throwing her easily debunked story into the mildest doubt. She thought she could fling shit and there be no blowback but stopping kavanagh. She's been put up to this crap. She's also clearly not well mentally to have sparked all this to begin with.

I went back to Senator Sheldon Whitehouse's statements because something about it bothered me so much that I have to scribe it down here:

"I submit that never, never in the history of background investigations has an investigation not been pursued when new, credible, derogatory information was brought forward about the nominee or the candidate. I don't think this has ever happened in the history of FBI background investigations. Maybe somebody can prove me wrong but it's wildly unusual and out-of-character."

I feel like this can be debunked and debunked hard.

The FBI looked into it and found nothing to go on. There are no witnesses. There are dozens upon dozens of character references from men and woman praising his attitude. He is the epitome of a sweater dad.

Instead you have a pair of very dubious accusers who's stories begin falling apart the minute questions are actually asked.
 
The GOP trying to keep mark judge
from testifying makes them look really guilty.
Mark Judge has nothing to do with anything. The GOP is not "trying" to keep him from testifying; he has nothing to say in the first place.

The consensus, even in republican media, is that she is believable, and that it's a bad idea for the nomination to go forward.
Consensus among what? Retarded ultra-partisans? Speds? Christine Ford has contradicted herself on multiple occasions, as well has her contemporaries saying that the alleged event never took place. There is no evidence for her accusations whatsoever.

And which "republican media", BTW?

The difference between her plain honesty vs, for instance, the Clinton Benghazi hearing is jarring. If she's pushing an agenda other than "I remember this happened" she's doing a bad job.
Stop being stupid.

Christine Ford is doing this to get her pussyhat activist 15 minutes of fame, by attempting to prevent Kavanaugh from becoming a Supreme Court justice.
 
If you want some fun since it can be boring sometimes, here's a Rad-Fem lolcow freaking out about all of this and can't wrap her head around why people aren't just throwing their support behind Ford.

https://twitter.com/brosandprose

Never heard of this person - blocked anyway. Imagine my shock.

So far the hearing back and forth has been five minutes of her getting questioned and senators bending over backwards for her demands, and then 5 minutes of senators demanding a FBI investigation, blaming the other side, implying Kavanaugh is already guilty, sucking her dick, and saying variations of #listenandbelieve

This is better than a circus and I really wish I had popcorn :story:The only way this could be better is if Anita and Zoe Quinn were looming over the hearing and live tweeting about it.

So now we know what your play is about.

One thing keeps running through my mind watching this entire fiasco. That is the assumption that "No woman would lie about this! These must be taken serriously!" Uh huh. Because false rape allegations have never ever been used to maintain political and social power in this nations history? Emmett Till would bed to disagree, if he hadn't been lynched following a false Rape accusation. For some reaon nobody remembers that the "Great American Novel" arguably the most defining piece of American Literature of the 20th Century, was about a woman falsely accusing a man of rape without, and the events that sprang from that. To Kill a Mockingbird. written by a woman. Isn't it remarkable how the Left always returns to the same toolsets? And yet people forget they were the Klan.

Don't you know that the book is problematic now?
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/why-are-we-still-teaching-kill-mockingbird-schools-ncna812281
 
The GOP trying to keep mark judge
from testifying makes them look really guilty. The consensus, even in republican media, is that she is believable, and that it's a bad idea for the nomination to go forward. The difference between her plain honesty vs, for instance, the Clinton Benghazi hearing is jarring. If she's pushing an agenda other than "I remember this happened" she's doing a bad job.
The Demofags would want everybody to testify because that takes time, and would derail the Kavanaugh soap opera well after the November midterms which they're betting on. Good for the GOP not falling for it. By the end of this testimony, the few undecided senators will have had enough of this bullshit story, and vote for him.
 
The Demofags would want everybody to testify because that takes time, and would derail the Kavanaugh soap opera well after the November midterms which they're betting on. Good for the GOP not falling for it. By the end of this testimony, the few undecided senators will have had enough of this bullshit story, and vote for him.

Also as the left love to point out, this is just a interview not a trial so Judge has every right not to want to show up. Its not like they can supeona him or anything..unless of course they want to take it to court which would be incredubly fun
 
What you are witnessing is the Dems "fuck you" back to the GOP after the Merrick Garland incident. They pissed and moaned about Gorsuch, but he was replacing hyper-conservative Scalia and they really had no leverage there. Kavanaugh is replacing a swing vote and they think they will have 2 years of blocking power come November (emphasis on that being their thinking, not mine). If they can torpedo nominees until then, they think they can put an end to Trump nominations, take back the WH in 2020 and go about their business. Unless they really do get a blue wave AND the economy shits itself close to 2020 election time, I believe that thinking is flawed.

They are completely amoral for manipulating some cat lady Dem activist into telling hazy, confused stories of alleged high school almost-rape, but this is a potential watershed moment for the SC and I guess all is fair in war.

The precedent this sets for SC nominations, or really any nomination that is reviewed by congress, is vile beyond words. Even if the Dems get their way entirely, you don't think the GOP is taking notes? Welcome to the perpetual shitshow.
 
Why are they even bringing up polygraphs? There’s a reason that no court of law admits them as evidence.

Well, apparently Brett Kavaunagh as a judge has found that employers can legally rely on polygraph tests when deciding who to give the job to, therefore he's being a FILTHY NASTY HYPOCRITE.

I suspect, and I'm not an American lawyer nor an employment lawyer, his reasoning was that so long as the employer does not directly or indirectly discriminate on the basis of a protected characteristic, they can employ anyone or no one for any reason. That doesn't mean polygraph tests suddenly are admissible. They are not. Nor does it mean they are accurate. It does not. You can read about how to cheat them on Wikihow or other sites within a few seconds of googling.

Polygraphs are exceptional fucking theatre and best kept to the Jeremy Kyle show. I think Christine Blasey Ford knows of the theatrical aspect of a polygraph test and is relying on people not knowing that they are ineffective to prompt them to think "if she was lying, why would she willingly take a polygraph test?"
 
Back