Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many pages back someone mentioned a comparison between Kavanaugh's response to all this bullshit and the time a guy whipped someone's ass with his cane on the senate floor. If I recall correctly that was one of the colorful moments leading up to the American civil war. We are on track for another massive civil schism. Fortunately the side I agree with is quite well armed, but unfortunately the side I disagree with controls major urban centers. If we do get civil war 2: electric boogaloo it will be an absolute fucking mess
 
Everything about Booker makes my skin crawl... I don’t know if it’s how he talks in this weird, pleading, yet-still condescending tone, or how his eyebrows don’t match the tone of his voice (they look angry but his voice is whining).

I dunno... *shudders*
I still like how he and the other Dems say "Kavanaugh not remembering the assault doesn't mean that it didn't happen."

I don't know about that, considering that an incident needs to happen in the first place for someone to remember (and then maybe forget) it.
 
Grassley: you’ve gone on 17 minutes...I’ve got 3 other people that need to speak.

Booker: I’m almost done just let me finish—!!

Grassley: ....are you willing to let other people speak?

Booker: yes but just let me finish (PATRIARCHYRAPEPRIVILEGE)


BRUH SHUT UP YOURE GROSS AND I WANT YOU OFF MY SCREEN. I WENT TO SMOKE AND HES STILL TALKING JESUS CHRIST.

[EDIT] oh my fucking god he’s finally gone thank you gawd
 
Now I would be amazed if he doesn't spend the next 30 years voting down everything that is proposed by any senator who happens to be a Democrat.

I don't think he'd do that. After watching the initial hearings, listening to everything Kavanaugh said and what others have said about him, I think he's a genuinely good and principled man. Being fair, impartial, and just is something that is immensely important to him, and he's spent most of his life building his career on those ideals. In addition, he's made it clear numerous times that his personal feelings and beliefs go out the window when he steps up on the bench, making note of how he has ruled in favor of some reprehensible people.

I just don't see someone like Kavanaugh abandoning everything he believes in and becoming the antithesis of what he believes in just because of what the democrats pulled. The best way he would be able to stick it to them for pulling this shit is to prove to them - and to the rest of the country - that he's not the person they make him out to be.
 
The best way he would be able to stick it to them for pulling this shit is to prove to them - and to the rest of the country - that he's not the person they make him out to be.

... a gang rapist? Seriously this is exactly the kind of eye-opening jaw-dropping shit that'll turn someone's heart to coal in a hurry, and nobody who's capable of thinking clearly would blame him for shooting them down on principle. Though I guess we'll just have to see.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Regret
Unrelated to the topic, but yesterday I walked into my house with my roommate sitting on the couch, crying into a tub of ice cream and saying that the GOPs prosecution of a sexual harassment accuser was a sign that Kavanaugh will likely get sworn in and that was a sign that the country was about to collapse, then started blubbering about pernicious radicalism. Fucking liberals, man.
Perfect opportunity to commit some sexual assault of your own. Nobody would believe her.
 
Many pages back someone mentioned a comparison between Kavanaugh's response to all this bullshit and the time a guy whipped someone's ass with his cane on the senate floor. If I recall correctly that was one of the colorful moments leading up to the American civil war. We are on track for another massive civil schism. Fortunately the side I agree with is quite well armed, but unfortunately the side I disagree with controls major urban centers. If we do get civil war 2 it will be an absolute fucking mess

The incident with the cane involved Charles Sumner, noted anti-slavery advocate, getting beaten half dead by Preston Brooks, a junior congressman who took umbrage to a speech Sumner gave which called out Preston's uncle, who was one of Sumner's opponents and quite pro-slavery.

Brooks then proceeded to savagely beat on Sumner with his cane until it broke and he had to be pulled off the man before he killed him.

Brooks was later censured for his actions as was a buddy of his, who knew what Brooks intended but said nothing. As for Sumner, he held no grudge against Brooks, saying years later Brooks had been just a much a victim of the passions of the slavery debate as had everyone else.

The same hyper partisanship reared it ugly head concerning the incident. The North was all "we knew the South's congressmen were thugs". The South, on the other hand, sent Brooks a ton of canes, including one inscribed "Hit him again!"

I consider this bald and crass attempt at character assassination of Kavanaugh based on shoddy evidence just as shameful as Brooks believing assault was a valid way to express his disgust with Sumner's views.
 
Last edited:
The other big problem is the ultimate end game of that strategy:

A) is ugly for everyone
B) doesn't end well for the party of city-dwelling pacifists who have systematically alienated the police, the military, and 95% of people who own the weapons in this country.
They just spent the last few weeks crucifying the stereotype of the type of moderate voter they need. The reasonably affluent career professional who is well-educated thoughtful and respected without a single blemish to spoil their reputation. Since they pissed away the last bit of goodwill with working class people in flyover country the soft spot for them are the upper middle class dads who coach their kids softball teams and drink beer on the weekends. They are the ones that would be most receptive to their policies. They are the swing vote.

But instead of reaching out to them they made them and their families look over their shoulder. They showed everyone just how easily they can yank the rug out from under people who don't play ball. Who are unfortunately in the wrong place at the wrong time and get in the way of their agenda. People exactly like them with a lot to lose and reputations to protect.

All to sway the remaining handful of women living under rocks that weren't polarized by this issue during the Trump campaign. Yeesh.
 
Real talk though...who here *hasn’t* gotten groped by a drunk friend/classmate/peer? Are you still traumatized by the ordeal, or did you resolve the situation after it happened? Or do you not remember because you drank beer and that beer made you blackout drunk?


I’m kidding. I’m just really tired of hearing this human face peel talk...
 
First things first, this woman isn't my friend. From what I gathered amid the tears though, she was referring to the fact that Republicans even had the gall to question a woman accusing a cis het WHITE male of sexual harassment.
Nobody questioned her story one iota though aside from it maybe not being Kavanaugh. That's something that really pisses me off. Nobody even questioned her on how long she knew Bret Kavanaugh and through what. How did she know for certain it was Kavanaugh if she didn't know him well when studies show mistaken identity in rape cases has been shown to near 1/3? Was she familiar enough with Kavanaugh to be sure of something like that? To what extent? How was the polygraph conducted? Were you on any medication when the polygraph was conducted... These are the questions a defense attorney would ask and would count as questioning.

"1 in 3 women will be assaulted in their lifetime" - Cory Booker

It's like they took the nonsense 1 in 4 college women and turned it up to 11.
That's probably a real stat if having ass or tit grabbed in a bar or someone forcefully trying to kiss you counts. Shitty for sure, stuff like that shouldn't happen to anyone, but the minor end of that scale is hardly life ending.
 
He was a douchey jock? Because he played sports? Because he was a rich kid at a fancy school? Because he's a problematic white male? What are you basing that on?
We don't have "information" that Kavanaugh was a shithead, though. We have a barely credible "witness" who has been all but completely discredited on every factual point she has.
i was referring to the yearbook entry molehill-made-mountain. dems & media argue there are references to sex acts, kavanaugh says that e.g. "devil's triangle" refers to a drinking game. that's probably untrue, but in a saner world he wouldn't have to lie, because it's absurd to indict anyone's character over mentioning a sex act as a teenager
It's like you're saying "Look, everyone did bad stuff, so kavenaugh must have done bad stuff, so he should admit it". You're not asking that of anyone else though, because you know that would be a stupid thing for anyone to do, and you have no reason to even believe it's true.
this feels like a reaction to a completely different post tbh, but i'm pretty sure you're talking to me. i said it would be stupid of him, but i wish it weren't (rather than "able" it may have been more precise to say "free to"):
kavanaugh should be able to say "yeah i was a jock, i said and did some douchey shit, but i've since grown up." he can't even admit that much, because it would be instantly blown out of proportion to further attack his character, without anyone stopping to think if it makes sense to go after someone for having said something crass or boozed a little too hard as a teenager
and to be clear, i'm not asking anyone to do anything, but i did say that i see this in everyone, not just the political class but also us plebs:
everyone's walking on eggshells or putting on a show for donors. even normal people happily lie to themselves over politics, and it's obvious because good liars are rare (listen for the false concerned tone with which C-SPAN callers often speak). almost nobody is being real and it's exhausting

hopefully that's the end of this retarded exegesis
 
... a gang rapist? Seriously this is exactly the kind of eye-opening jaw-dropping shit that'll turn someone's heart to coal in a hurry, and nobody who's capable of thinking clearly would blame him for shooting them down on principle. Though I guess we'll just have to see.
Don't get me wrong, he has plenty of motive to do what you're suggesting. I just think as a person he's better than that.
 
Back