Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If we keep getting shitflinging like this with every new Supreme Court justice, I wouldn't be surprised if in a few years there's a genuine bipartisan movement for term limits on Supreme Court justices. Maybe 16 or 20 years would be good.
the left were only able to do as much damage to civilization as they have by stacking the courts. i don't want to see any kind of change in scotus term length until we have done the same in kind
 
tick tock, shitlibs

https://web.archive.org/web/20181004151213/https://twitter.com/AP/status/1047850088494747648
upload_2018-10-4_10-14-36.png


https://web.archive.org/web/20181004151230/https://apnews.com/c4ef2acd337c42d1b55c5c1536ca3048
upload_2018-10-4_10-15-3.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-4_10-15-5.png
    upload_2018-10-4_10-15-5.png
    89.4 KB · Views: 34
Senator Feinstein and Schumer are holding a press conference to say what everyone knew they were going to say, that the FBI report isn't good enough and Trump/Grassley made it too limited:

Meanwhile the Senate is in session and will be debating about Kavanaugh, so get your popcorn ready :popcorn:
“Not good enough! Blame him for saomething! SAY HE’S GUILTY! SAY IT!”
 
Do we need a poll on how this plays out for Dr Ford as the stall tactic winds down and she's no longer of use to her new political buddies?

Does she get a windfall of cash from the GoFundMe and go back to the comfortable bosom of academia mostly unscathed? Or does the GOP take an interest ruining her shit as the Dems claim the crowd funding cash to cover "expenses", then use her as a scapegoat for waning poll numbers?

My honest guess is that not much happens to her. The GOP can't risk looking petty and vengeful if they win the day. But if the Dems can think of a way to use their discarded toy to fix their blunder, I think it could get ugly for her.
 
How is kavanaugh supposed to preside over cases from the aclu now? Is that why they are doing this?

SCOTUS has no Obligation to recuse. In fact the only real rule is if they have a direct business tie or family member. Do note that both Ginsberg and Kagan on ruled on matters that they themselves previously argued before the court as litigants. Short answer is the ACLU is screwed. But that happens either way. Do you think the other Justices, especially the Conservative side of the room is watching the ACLU antics with a smile? Clarence THomas knows what was done to him. He sees it amped up to 11 here.

Feinstein and Schumers play in this was the assumption that the GOP always backs down in the face of controversy. Always seeks to meekly take the higher road. They assumed that any claim of controversy, any mild stain on a perfect candidate, would force them to withdraw a nominee and select another. The GOP isn't supposed to stand up and push back. That's not normal! That's not how the world is supposed to work! It always worked for Harry Reid!!!! I think what is really starting to worry them is the backlash looming from flyover country. They expected mobs to take up pitchforks. They just didn't expect to be the ones running for the windmill.

Do we need a poll on how this plays out for Dr Ford as the stall tactic winds down and she's no longer of use to her new political buddies?

Does she get a windfall of cash from the GoFundMe and go back to the comfortable bosom of academia mostly unscathed? Or does the GOP take an interest ruining her shit as the Dems claim the crowd funding cash to cover "expenses", then use her as a scapegoat for waning poll numbers?

My honest guess is that not much happens to her. The GOP can't risk looking petty and vengeful if they win the day. But if the Dems can think of a way to use their discarded toy to fix their blunder, I think it could get ugly for her.

She gets a ton of cash, a book deal, and goes on the Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu victim speaking circuit. At the same time we see a steady flurry of reports from her actual students on what a psycho she is. These get dismissed as misogyny (of course). Long term Dr. Ford makes a bundle. But I think State Legislatures are finally going to start reining in Humanities Program funding. Expect to see a greater push for STEM, vastly improved STEM funding. While the Diversity offices and Genders STudies programs get quietly defunded and gutted.

DR. Ford's stall tactic has already failed. McConnell doesn't like surprises. The FBI report was shown to the Senators privately, under tight control. That no Dem is screaming in vindication tells you all you need to know. McConnell has scheduled the Cloture vote. He would not do that unless he was certain he had the votes. Grassley is not tolerating anymore last minute nonsense. It's done. It's happening. He gets voted on on Saturday and sworn first thing Monday morning. It's done. The dems are in a panic because what they expected to be their October Surprise Blue Wave driving issue is being met with mass revulsion in the places they needed to win. It's done!.

Sadly no one will ever press any charges against Dr. Ford or force further inquiry, because that would be "bad form".
 
Last edited:
Senator Feinstein and Schumer are holding a press conference to say what everyone knew they were going to say, that the FBI report isn't good enough and Trump/Grassley made it too limited:

Remember, kids, you're always guilty of whatever they say you are; it's just a matter of investigating until they find the proof.
 
I was listening to a clip on Hannity yesterday afternoon; some Soros-paid agitator teary eyed woman confronted Lindsey Graham, weeping and screaming and saying I'm a victim how dare you HURF BLURF and his response was, "If your son or husband was being falsely accused would you or would you not demand due process." That fucking shut her up. Wish I could find the clip.
 

Im pretty sure the FBI just reprinted the last report that they did not even bother to read to see if this time they give a shit

View attachment 558721

Reddit is fucking exceptional.

Would you blame him? they made his life and the life of his family a living hell, if i were him i would make their life miserable for as long as i am SCOTUS, hell his case was so bad that WAS EVEN TRENDING in Venezuela, with Chaviztas calling it a demonstration of how ruined USA is and the Opposition calling all the process unfair and comparing it with the Witch hunts of Maduro
 
She gets a ton of cash, a book deal, and goes on the Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu victim speaking circuit. At the same time we see a steady flurry of reports from her actual students on what a psycho she is. These get dismissed as misogyny (of course). Long term Dr. Ford makes a bundle. But I think State Legislatures are finally going to start reining in Humanities Program funding. Expect to see a greater push for STEM, vastly improved STEM funding. While the Diversity offices and Genders STudies programs get quietly defunded and gutted.

DR. Ford's stall tactic has already failed. McConnell doesn't like surprises. The FBI report was shown to the Senators privately, under tight control. That no Dem is screaming in vindication tells you all you need to know. McConnell has scheduled the Cloture vote. He would not do that unless he was certain he had the votes. Grassley is not tolerating anymore last minute nonsense. It's done. It's happening. He gets voted on on Saturday and sworn first thing Monday morning. It's done. The dems are in a panic because what they expected to be their October Surprise Blue Wave driving issue is being met with mass revulsion in the places they needed to win. It's done!.

Sadly no one will ever press any charges against Dr. Ford or force further inquiry, because that would be "bad form".

In the event she goes full lolcow and tries to profiteer off her 15 minutes of infamy, I could see her getting flattened by conservative interests. It's one thing to make questionable but possibly good faith accusations based on your garbled memories of high school drinking. It's another to be a constant pain in the ass after your 15 minutes are up.
 
"Doctor Ford won America's hearts, and the Republicans are upset that it derailed their headlong rush to nominate Brett Kavanaugh to the supreme court."

Schumer, you mincing thundercunt, how are you able to be so accurate yet so dishonest at once? You only have one mouth!

Yes, we're upset that you derailed politics with theater. You're right.
 
She gets a ton of cash, a book deal, and goes on the Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu victim speaking circuit. At the same time we see a steady flurry of reports from her actual students on what a psycho she is. These get dismissed as misogyny (of course). Long term Dr. Ford makes a bundle.
This is the most likely course of action, she wont be prosecuted due to bad optics 'don't attack the victim' bullshit narrative, especially not just before mid terms. You only miss it ending with a very suspicious death once she fades into irrelevancy AKA 2 bullets to the back of the hippocampus - ruled suicide because nobody believed her.
 
hell his case was so bad that WAS EVEN TRENDING in Venezuela, with Chaviztas calling it a demonstration of how ruined USA is and the Opposition calling all the process unfair and comparing it with the Witch hunts of Maduro
Am I being too :optimistic: in assuming that even Chavistas can see what an utter farce this is and are laughing at the USA for allowing it to go on in the first place or are they unironically spouting #listenandbelieve too?
 
Back