Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The saddest thing is this was a lost fight from the start.

The Democrats and they're progressive attack dogs went all out to stop this nomination.

They pulled out all the stops. Blasting MSM attacks, student protests and even dragged out the ACLU (revealing it to be just another Democrat PaC basically) and what did it get them?

Squat.

They just revealed how fucking weak the democrat progressive wing is, it's all bark and no bite and worse then that it energized the Republicans to fight back.

Trump has showned that if you don't buckle down to the moral club smash that is the progressives only real power (do as we say or your a bad person basically) you win.

They threw everything they had a Trump and he's still the president, they threw everything they had at Kavenaugh and he will still go to the Supreme Court.

The only question left is will the democrats take the lesson and realize that they held all the cards and still lost because they no longer have the backing of the average American or will they triple down and burn the last shredss of diginty and good will they have left in a final attempt to claim progressivism is the sole future?

I'm guessing the latter...
 
Am I being too :optimistic: in assuming that even Chavistas can see what an utter farce this is and are laughing at the USA for allowing it to go on in the first place or are they unironically spouting #listenandbelieve too?

You know you are doing terrible when even communists that put witch trials every day for political enemies are calling it bullshit
 
The only question left is will the democrats take the lesson and realize that they held all the cards and still lost because they no longer have the backing of the average American or will they triple down and burn the last shredss of diginty and good will they have left in a final attempt to claim progressivism is the sole future?

I'm guessing the latter...

The Dems are in the same boat the Repubs were in in 2008. They were scattered with no real leadership, and had no real plan except to stubbornly oppose anything the party in power brought in.
 
Meanwhile the Senate is in session and will be debating about Kavanaugh, so get your popcorn ready

This is new: that video on YouTube has a helpful bar below it informing me that Russia Today is, shockingly, funded (at least in part) by the Russian government. There's a Wikipedia link too to back it up with evidence!

Sooo... not only should (((certain people))) be tagged with certain browser plugins, platform holders will now do it by default to stay fair and balanced, right?
 
Get ready for a possible Category 5000 Salt Typhoon

1538666905605.jpg


1538669609657m.jpg


1538668515620.jpg
 
Sadly no one will ever press any charges against Dr. Ford or force further inquiry, because that would be "bad form".

This is the most likely course of action, she wont be prosecuted due to bad optics 'don't attack the victim' bullshit narrative, especially not just before mid terms.
"Was" bad form. I think with how things are shifting and the fact that it's blatantly obvious she isn't a victim they might just go after her. Most likely nothing'll come of it, but just showing that false accusers will suffer consequences of some sort would go over well with the public.

Of course I'm probably being unrealistically optimistic here.
 
So word on the street is that Democrats are still ree-ing despite the FBI not finding anything. Granted, I don't know all the details, but if there isn't much more to it than "This guy is very likely innocent" and they're still shouting then I just gotta say one thing.

Y'all, this is how you lose the fencesitters. How 'bout instead of dicking around and trying to claim the high-ground you make sure you actually have a fucking case to stand on? I was perfectly neutral to this whole thing until you got everything you wanted and still cried fowl. Seriously, I'd might have even taken your side if you took the L and bowed out gracefully but no. More antics.

Please stop wasting my time.
 
"Was" bad form. I think with how things are shifting and the fact that it's blatantly obvious she isn't a victim they might just go after her. Most likely nothing'll come of it, but just showing that false accusers will suffer consequences of some sort would go over well with the public.

Of course I'm probably being unrealistically optimistic here.

You will notice that the FBI did not interview her. Yet the core Senators ( save perhaps the clueless moron Booker) have not start shrieking about that specifically. They just claim “inadequate investigation”. What that says is in private they have been told in no uncertain terms by the FBI that she is full of shit. And that if the FBI did talk to her it would be an instant perjury trap in public, that they would have to prosecute. She would either be lying to the FBI, or admitting her Senate testimony was perjury. The FBI tasked 300 agents to this over the past few days. The Dems are looking at a mess. Which is why they repeat a bland vague narrative, but no facts anymore.

The thing to watch for any legal blowback is Feinstein. She is the one in real jeopardy. Neither Grassley nor Cocaine Mitch are prepared to forgive and forget. But she has fucked up so bad to both sides, that she might lose to a Progressive nut job in November. If she wins McConnell drops the ethics hammer. If that turns out that Feinstein either knew or had doubts about Ford, then Ford may be at risk.
 
I'm going to say, "things are looking better than they did last Saturday, but I'm not going to relax until he's officially seated." This whole thing has had so many insane twists that even M. Night Shaymalan would look at it askance. Would anyone be surprised if, at this point, Feinstein brought a luridly insane, heretofor-unknown accuser to the final vote as one last Hail Mary attempt to scuttle it?

That said, I am loving the vitriol that this has pulled out of the GOP. It's weird to think how after decades of being cucked, pseudo-principled losers, the thing that made them finally say "fuck it" was a shitposting president and a set of allegations so scurrilous they wouldn't pass muster in Salem.
 
The saddest thing is this was a lost fight from the start.

The Democrats and they're progressive attack dogs went all out to stop this nomination.

They pulled out all the stops. Blasting MSM attacks, student protests and even dragged out the ACLU (revealing it to be just another Democrat PaC basically) and what did it get them?

Squat.

They just revealed how fucking weak the democrat progressive wing is, it's all bark and no bite and worse then that it energized the Republicans to fight back.

Trump has showned that if you don't buckle down to the moral club smash that is the progressives only real power (do as we say or your a bad person basically) you win.

They threw everything they had a Trump and he's still the president, they threw everything they had at Kavenaugh and he will still go to the Supreme Court.

The only question left is will the democrats take the lesson and realize that they held all the cards and still lost because they no longer have the backing of the average American or will they triple down and burn the last shredss of diginty and good will they have left in a final attempt to claim progressivism is the sole future?

I'm guessing the latter...

They have forgotten the rule all religions have to abide by: there MUST be a path to repentance. Say what you will about indulgences, but they did serve an important societal function by allowing people to pay for their sins and find some way back into the group's good graces. If you're going to have a moral standard, there has to be a way for people to make things right after they fall short of it. An article on the federalist talked about this before: "We'll agree that racism is the worst thing ever and all racists are pariah BUT you can't just accuse anybody and everybody of racism."

Well the SJWs went and got addicted to the power and started accusing anybody of anything saying "you are guilty, no matter what" if you're the wrong kind of person. Once the normies realize "doesn't matter - still guilty" then they have no incentive to even trying to play by the rules any more - because only an idiot bothers with trying to play a rigged game.
 
Back