Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is going to sound terrible, but I'm honestly surprised the FBI said "Fuck it, there's no evidence." With the whole Russia tangle and everything else that's going on, I would have been prepared to bet that they'd go out of their way to tank Trump's nominee. But I suppose it's a mistake to think of any group as a single monolithic entity--someone's still on the job at the Bureau. (Shame me for being jobist, I suppose.)

They were put on the trail of a groping that occurred somewhere in Maryland sometime between 1979 and 1983, with an indeterminate number of people attending, where all but one of the purported guests denied any such event occurring. If I was at work and someone gave me equivalent instructions that vague, I'd roll my eyes and put in a bare minimum of effort as well- what exactly are the expecting from parameters that vague?

Incidentally, her inability to keep her story straight even when surrounded by a gaggle of lawyers is what makes me think that Ford is some flavor of mentally ill. Someone in full possession of her facilities would have a final story more or less hammered out, with an honest actor saying "this is how I think it happened" and a dishonest one lining up all the juicy made-up details for prime time consumption. It's like she's mashing together half a dozen events in her head, and keeps being unclear on which pieces go where.
 
0495a8b041baa959c43a6b5374e6af9f.png

Well leak it, then. You guys love doing that. If it's such a damaging blow to your opposition, why haven't any of you leaked it to the NYT?
 
Is anyone surprised? The democrats have been shrieking for weeks now about the need for an FBI investigation. We all knew if they got said investigation the FBI would turn up nothing. Its an accusation of a groping 30 years ago that was never even mentioned to anyone until at least two decades after it happened. Of course they were not going to turn up shit, and of course the Democrats were going to complain the FBI did not do its job properly.
 
0495a8b041baa959c43a6b5374e6af9f.png

Well leak it, then. You guys love doing that. If it's such a damaging blow to your opposition, why haven't any of you leaked it to the NYT?

That’s the beauty. The FBI set it up so the Senators cannot leak it. There is one copy. Each Senator goes into a room with the FBI to read it.

And do note “Bob Menendez” a true expert on “Bullshit FBI Investigations” he’s the one waiting on re-trial for the massive bribes, Medicare fraud, old people subjected to U.N. needed surgery for profit, and let’s not forget Underaged Teenage Prostitutes!!! Truly a protector of the women!
 
2016-17: "The FBI is infallible and trustworthy! They are the good guys in helping us bring down Two-Hands McOrange and his Russian puppet masters!"

2018: "THE FBI IS CORRUPT AND WORTHLESS! DRUMPH AND THE EVIL GOP HAVE BOUGHT THEM OFF! THEY'RE LITERALLY RAPISTS JUST LIKE CRY BABY KAVANAUGH!!!"
 
He’s lost his goddamn mind and has been asking people to start a revolution for several months now (saw him on Bill Maher basically telling people to start shit at protests and Bill just ignored it).

I don’t see that fat fuck piece of shit risking his life or freedom, only asking others to do it.

Don’t you always love how the fools demanding revolutions (from others) will so obviously be the first ones against the wall when their glorious people’s republic of utopia and workers paradise actually arrives?
 
More debating, cloture vote is today:
Mitch McConnell said:
Today we can send a message to the American people. That some core principles remain unfettered by the partisan passions of this moment. Facts matter. Fairness matters. The presumption of innocence is sacred. This institution does not look back proudly on the era of Joseph McCarthy nor on any of the other times when the politics of personal destruction poisoned its judgement...
Nice one McConnell. :pinetar:

Now... how long until he's labelled a communist for bashing McCarthy since repubs being commie spies is apparently a thing now?
 
lol Republican Murkowski of Alaska voted no on the Cloture while Democrat Manchin of West Va. voted yes.

What a timeline :story:

(for those uninformed the Cloture is the vote that limits debate and prevents a fillabuster for happening. Voting yes means debate is limited, no means it dragging on)

Either way 51 yae and 49 nay
 
Don’t you always love how the fools demanding revolutions (from others) will so obviously be the first ones against the wall when their glorious people’s republic of utopia and workers paradise actually arrives?
the prospect of putting michael moore and his ilk against a wall actually kind of makes me want to fight a revolution. good job
 
lol Republican Murkowski of Alaska voted no on the Cloture while Democrat Manchin of West Va. voted yes.

What a timeline :story:
Not the first time. Murkowski has been voting against the majority of things her fellow republicans have been voting in favor of for years and she's been critical of Trump quite a few times, often calling his decisions and those of her fellow reps "cruel and tragic". She was also against Trump's choice for secretary of education. Susan Collins is the other notable republican who often sides with Murkowski, often opposing Trump and fellow reps and she supported the majority of Obama's choices. When all the other reps in the senate vote yes, you can bet Collins and Murkowski will vote no. A suspicious duo who loved Obama and dems. They've even been referred to as the "liberal Republicans". Basically embodying everything wrong with both parties.

Edit: Thank you Collins for proving us wrong and showing that you actually do have morals and aren't just in it for yourself.
 
Last edited:
I'm actually quite surprised there haven't been more comparisons to the Satanic Panic of the 1980s. It was the first thing that came to my mind when all this started and "recovered memories" started popping up. When it turned out Brett Kavanaugh was secretly the leader of a gang rape squad, I figured we'd hit it, but apparently people can't learn lessons from the past and so history must repeat itself.
A lot of the people that believe Kavanaugh to be guilty are too young to remember that. The ones old enough to don't want to bring it up for obvious reasons.
 
Back