Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There's a senator from Oregon speaking about Brett Kavanaugh and I swear he's got some kind of mental problem.

He is REALLY harping down on the fact Kavanaugh was mad he was being falsely accused of rape and therefore he's not judge material.

He also says this process has been corrupted by Republican partisanship LOL
 
Flake is a yes. Heitkamp (NO) is toast in North Dakota. Donnelly (NO) probably is going to lose his seat in Indiana. Manchin (YES) might have saved his seat in West Virginia. Murkowski (NO) has 4 years to memory hole her vote. Collins announces at 3pm.

I have a weird feeling she's a NO and the Head Turtle in Charge is going to have to get another Democrat to come on board to avoid a 49-51 loss. This thing is a goddamn rollercoaster of expectations.

I dunno who is pulling the strings on these faggot Senators, but if the entire lot of them were vivisected, you might find half a spine in total.
 
Flake is a yes. Heitkamp (NO) is toast in North Dakota. Donnelly (NO) probably is going to lose his seat in Indiana. Manchin (YES) might have saved his seat in West Virginia. Murkowski (NO) has 4 years to memory hole her vote. Collins announces at 3pm.

I have a weird feeling she's a NO and the Head Turtle in Charge is going to have to get another Democrat to come on board to avoid a 49-51 loss. This thing is a goddamn rollercoaster of expectations.

I dunno who is pulling the strings on these faggot Senators, but if the entire lot of them were vivisected, you might find half a spine in total.
Why the hell does it take so long to do a vote? Can’t they just set up a push button at their seats in Congress (yes, no, abstain) and get it over with?
 
DowiG0zVAAAvn2q.jpg

Oh Jesus, Mary, and Joseph give it a fucking rest already. I'm never going to be able to hear "Russia" again for the rest of my life without pushing out a hard, disgusted sigh just out of reflex because of these people.
 
Flake is a yes. Heitkamp (NO) is toast in North Dakota. Donnelly (NO) probably is going to lose his seat in Indiana. Manchin (YES) might have saved his seat in West Virginia. Murkowski (NO) has 4 years to memory hole her vote. Collins announces at 3pm.

I have a weird feeling she's a NO and the Head Turtle in Charge is going to have to get another Democrat to come on board to avoid a 49-51 loss. This thing is a goddamn rollercoaster of expectations.

I dunno who is pulling the strings on these faggot Senators, but if the entire lot of them were vivisected, you might find half a spine in total.
she voted yes
 
DowiG0zVAAAvn2q.jpg

Oh Jesus, Mary, and Joseph give it a fucking rest already. I'm never going to be able to hear "Russia" again for the rest of my life without pushing out a hard, disgusted sigh just out of reflex because of these people.
CAF1B423-2CE9-41D3-AC23-F508D2E63C9E.jpeg


Agreed, this is just getting stupid as fuck.
 
she voted yes

She voted YES on moving to the final vote, but she has a 3pm press conference setup to announce something. We'll see. I'm probably just paranoid because they are relying on Flake's YES to remain, and it is true that I can't imagine McConnell would have moved forward without the votes BUT I remember the ObamaCare Repeal vote pretty clearly.

Why the hell does it take so long to do a vote? Can’t they just set up a push button at their seats in Congress (yes, no, abstain) and get it over with?

There's a rule that the Senate has to wait 30 hours after voting to move forward after this vote and this is a rollcall vote system which is designed to require presence of the Senator to vote. It is archaic but it is most often demanded by some grandstanding politician.
 
Flake is a yes. Heitkamp (NO) is toast in North Dakota. Donnelly (NO) probably is going to lose his seat in Indiana. Manchin (YES) might have saved his seat in West Virginia. Murkowski (NO) has 4 years to memory hole her vote. Collins announces at 3pm.

I have a weird feeling she's a NO and the Head Turtle in Charge is going to have to get another Democrat to come on board to avoid a 49-51 loss. This thing is a goddamn rollercoaster of expectations.

I dunno who is pulling the strings on these faggot Senators, but if the entire lot of them were vivisected, you might find half a spine in total.

Between the liberals in Evansville who got Donnelly elected, and the exceptional urban sludge in Indianapolis who are responsible for that turd Andre Carson, Donnelly getting the axe may be easier said than done. The Republicans could have picked a better guy to run against him, too.
 
She voted YES on moving to the final vote, but she has a 3pm press conference setup to announce something. We'll see. I'm probably just paranoid because they are relying on Flake's YES to remain, and it is true that I can't imagine McConnell would have moved forward without the votes BUT I remember the ObamaCare Repeal vote pretty clearly.
then what was the point of voting yes in the first place. she would be commiting political suicide, and it would be pointless in the first place. she would basically be saying fuck you to her voters,and the other senators. if she wants to keep being a senator she would stick with her guns. flake isn't running for re-election so i might be weary on him. if they wanted to vote no they would have voted no in the first place.
 
Oh, I didn't even notice that Phil Breseden flipped to a YES. He must have been watching his poll numbers fall during Trump's Tennessee rally.

I'm now confident he'll be confirmed again.

glasscase.gif



then what was the point of voting yes in the first place. she would be commiting political suicide, and it would be pointless in the first place. she would basically be saying fuck you to her voters,and the other senators. if she wants to keep being a senator she would stick with her guns. flake isn't running for re-election so i might be weary on him. if they wanted to vote no they would have voted no in the first place.

Scheming. Brokering deals for more power, better committees. Money. Blackmail. These fuckers don't vote with a conscious, they vote to empower or enrich themselves.
 
DowiG0zVAAAvn2q.jpg

Oh Jesus, Mary, and Joseph give it a fucking rest already. I'm never going to be able to hear "Russia" again for the rest of my life without pushing out a hard, disgusted sigh just out of reflex because of these people.
How much does the media want a war on Russia right now?
 
Flake is a yes. Heitkamp (NO) is toast in North Dakota. Donnelly (NO) probably is going to lose his seat in Indiana. Manchin (YES) might have saved his seat in West Virginia. Murkowski (NO) has 4 years to memory hole her vote. Collins announces at 3pm.

I have a weird feeling she's a NO and the Head Turtle in Charge is going to have to get another Democrat to come on board to avoid a 49-51 loss. This thing is a goddamn rollercoaster of expectations.

I dunno who is pulling the strings on these faggot Senators, but if the entire lot of them were vivisected, you might find half a spine in total.
If we're talking about who could lose their seat over a No vote then McCaskill in Missouri, Tester in Montana and Nelson in Florida are three to watch for sure. All of them are confirmed No's but that could be the final nail in their coffins.
Baldwin in Wisconsin and Smith in Minnesota are possibility's. Again both No's but a pissed off GOP base might be able to topple them.
Wild Cards are Kaine in Virginia and Menendez in New Jersey. I think there is a small chance that Kaine could go down and Menendez's corruption trial had already hurt him coming into this so who knows.
On the GOP side most incumbents were shored up by the base getting pissed off so that only leaves Heller in Nevada as a question mark. From what I've heard he's a Yes which might save him or doom him. Its really up in the air at the moment.
 
lol Republican Murkowski of Alaska voted no on the Cloture while Democrat Manchin of West Va. voted yes.

What a timeline :story:

(for those uninformed the Cloture is the vote that limits debate and prevents a fillabuster for happening. Voting yes means debate is limited, no means it dragging on)

Either way 51 yae and 49 nay

Not as much of a surprise on Manchin, if he's hoping to maintain his seat he'll have to fall in line a bit. West Virginia voted around 70% in favor of Trump during the 2016 election so going against your states choice for President might be a bit of a bad idea. Murkowski is effectively a RINO so her duplicity is hardly surprising.
 
Back