Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nice typo. Also, I honestly find it amazing when people say that Brett Kavanaugh might maybe potentially possibly be a sex offender, or Christine Ford maybe actually potentially possibly having been sexually assaulted, because "it's a he-said/she-said".

Except that it's not.

Brett Kavanaugh, in at least one instance, had direct evidence to his innocence: his 1980s calendar.

Christine Ford has less than nothing; her own supposed "corroborators" turned on her. And it's not like there was any real evidence of her being sexually abused otherwise; just a completely inconsistent story of hers.


>mansplaining

Iesous Christos, do feminists ever learn?

When your own "Corroborating Witness" the one you presented UNder Oath, says "Hell no, no such events took place and I have never in my life met or been in the same place as the accused" That's not simply not corroborating the accusers story. That is in fact evidence of innocence.
 
Oh fuck me guys.......can yall just imagine how delicious its gonna be when he is officially sworn in?

I mean we all remember this glorious singularity of salt back when on January 20th 2017
So given how fanatical the dems push against him has been these past few weeks, maybe we can get a repeat performance

(also jeeesus fuck this video is even more hilarious than i remember, jesus fuck this screaming hambeast is just the perfect epitomy of the past 2 years of left wing politics)

That's not a video of Michael Moore? ... oh... oh my... how unfortunate for her/him/xir/it/shem/etc
 
m1b9Bb7.png
 
We'll see what happens if RBG dies and Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett to replace her. The feminists will probably despise her almost as much but any trumped up rape accusations are probably dead in the water. Maybe they'll try to make up some racist allegations instead which would be truly ironic.
Sheneequa Chevy Chevette will claim Barrett called her a nigger in 1992 and pulled her weave out, but her ex-boyfriends Tyrone and Tayshaun will say she's a crazy bitch and that never happened, while Feinstein will say we should all believe her 1000%.
 
Funny how the femtards made assumptions that Kavanaugh was a rapist because he likes beer. I'm thinking they're stereotyping his Irish ethnicity because Irish men must love getting drunk from beer (so much for the left claiming not to be racists). So far, Kavanaugh is a respectable person and he should be confirmed. The federal government is a mess and have programs that state governments already have meaning therefore, the federal government needs major cuts and reorganization. If the Supreme Court respects and enforces the Tenth Amendment into full force, we will see lots of positive changes and by confirming Kavanaugh, it will make American lives better and not have to deal with things like the IRS. We killed Obamacare, we should kill other things like the IRS. Most Americans already pay taxes to their respective state governments before state governments pay their federal taxes and fees from their budgets to the federal government.
 
I didn't know the ACLU Foundation was separate from the ACLU. Either way, unless these attack ads can be classified as lobbying there's nothing actionable about the foundation's 501(c)(3) status.
The attack ads are probably run through their 501(c)(4), so what they're doing is completely legal and wont effect things. I just don't like how orgs can cover themselves with goodwill and gain notoriety and credibility that way. I know there's really nothing to be done about it under current laws.
 
Short of some old-age revelation / soul searching, I can't see her voluntarily stepping down while Trump is still in office. She knows doing so would turn the court conservative, especially if Thomas decides to retire while Trump is in office.

Ginsberg arrogantly refused to retire under Obama when the Dems BEGGED her to. She insisted she would be replaced by the first woman President. She has also in the past indicated that the Job, going to the court every day is literally the only thing she has in life. The only activity that keeps her alive. Otherwise she is an old lady living in one room collecting bits of string until the Grim Reaper comes knocking. She'll be there in her pee stained custom fitted Judges chair until they chisel her out in rigormortis.

On the positive side we likely don't have long to wait for that to happen. She is a frail, senile old octogenarian with 4 bouts of cancer in recent years. And flu season is right around the corner!

Wait, i haven't kept up to date with American politics, who's Brett Kavanaugh, why do people (I'm guessing liberals/leftist/democrats) hate him and anything else I'm missing?

Seriously, who is this guy?

He's Trump's appointment to the US Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice William Kennedy. That's it. He is simply a Trump Court nominee who by all accounts lived a honest, honorable and blameless life. So they rounded up a crazy academic cat lady to falsely claim "He Molestored me in 1982 when we was in High School!!!"

For non American's, control of the Court has long been the liberals dream as they ramrod stuff they cannot enact legislatively through via shady court decisions. In recent years the court was on a razors balance of 4 liberals 4 conservatives and Kennedy was the centrist swing vote that could go either way in an almost random manner. Replacing him with a Trump appointee swings the court hard 5-4 Conservative for at least the next 15 years. With the centerpiece of the leftist Judges, Ruth Bader Ginsberg not looking all that healthy at 86, and the other leftist stalwart William Breyer right behind her at 82 or 83.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The attack ads are probably run through their 501(c)(4), so what they're doing is completely legal and wont effect things. I just don't like how orgs can cover themselves with goodwill and gain notoriety and credibility that way. I know there's really nothing to be done about it under current laws.
You are probably right and I should have said as much. However, As far as I can tell they could run the ads through the foundation and have 0 legal issues.
Prior to 1954, there was no statutory provision absolutely prohibiting organizations described in the antecedents of IRC 501(c)(3) from engaging in political campaign activities.2 The political campaign prohibition does have a vague and unenacted antecedent, however. What eventually became the Revenue Act of 1934, under which the lobbying restriction of IRC 501(c)(3) was first enacted, at one time contained a provision extending the prohibition to "participation in partisan politics." S. Rep. No. 73-558, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 26 (1934). The provision, however, was deleted in conference, so that only the lobbying restriction remained.
 
Was the Mid-Orgasm-Face really appropriate for this shot, or does she instinctively assume that pose every time a camera is pointed at her?

The Camera has been pointed at her all day. She's wearing a barely there cropped wifebeater and no bra. When faced with the rabid herd of hairy overfed dangerhairs that photographer has found the only path to sanity and is sticking with it till the end!
 
Back