Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aqqsql.jpg
 
Normally I would side with the victim and would want the rapist to fry but coming out of the woodwork 30 so years and told everybody he raped her or almost did, specifically on the day Brett is suppose to be nominated? I'll play Devil's Advocate and ask her the hard questions like when it happen and why did you wait so long to reveal this information. I would than ask for some rape kits and reports. If there's any. The only thing Brett is accused of is being a stinking drunk. I swear this is the type of thing that makes me want to see the Republicans win this month.

Not only that - but the idea of "Now was the time" is insane. Like was she fine with being raped when he was only high-powered federal judge or when he was only a coach for a young girl's sports team?
 
I mean... she was clearly lying, so... no... I guess?

I get she's lying, I'm just pointing out her motivation for "coming forward" is as half-baked as everything else in her testimony. If he was in fact a rapist she let him get appointed as a federal judge and spend huge amounts of time with young girls as an authority figure. Even if she was telling the truth it's despicable she'd let so many potential other people be harmed by him (if he was actually a rapist and not one of the must upright people who ever lived).
 
I get she's lying, I'm just pointing out her motivation for "coming forward" is as half-baked as everything else in her testimony. If he was in fact a rapist she let him get appointed as a federal judge and spend huge amounts of time with young girls as an authority figure. Even if she was telling the truth it's despicable she'd let so many potential other people be harmed by him (if he was actually a rapist and not one of the must upright people who ever lived).
I think I was agreeing with you lol.
 
I'm not going to bother reading through 194 pages, and this has probably been said before and I'm probably :late:, but remember when feminists got pissy when Margaret fucking Atwood told them to calm their titties and that all those sexual assault accusations were starting to look like a witch hunt?

The irony in all this is that the lady, back in the eighties, well, she wrote a little book called The Handmaid's Tale. You have some televangelist lady called Serena Joy Waterford (because let's get real subtle with the names here) who goes and publishes a shitty book about how women should stay in the kitchen. For some reason, that book causes a major regime change where some women are treated as cattle because they can give birth (well, honestly, the handmaidens' treatment makes no fucking sense considering they're like a "national resource", even if I absolutely hate to put it that way, but that's a topic for another day).

Meanwhile, amidst all the Harry Potter and 1984 comparisons, what's going on in our world? Well, Margaret Atwood and many other feminists like her are the ones who paved the way for those very witch hunts, even if that's not what they intended. Now, they have to deal with the consequences and how it went too far, like Serena Joy did. A lot of their fears ended up being true, albeit not in the way they intended it to be AT ALL. What pisses me off about the whole case is that the whole thing is so sloppy, and feminists don't seem to realize that shady accusations and unconditional belief in rape accusations is not helping actual victims. It actually just makes it harder for them, because, welp, people aren't idiots and they don't like being treated like cattle. The story of the little boy who cried wolf never gets old.

Long story short, when it comes to feminists... you either die falsely thinking you're June, or live long enough to become Serena Joy.

That's because those making the unconditional accusations don't care about actual victims. It's all about blind exercise of power. The ends justifies the means. Actual victims of rape? If oneof them happens to somehow get helped its at best a happy accident to use for propoganda. Otherwise they get ground in like everybody else. Watch for what happens to Dr. Ford in a few weeks.
 
Almost every Hollywood celebrity is losing their mind or becoming bitter as fuck on Twitter and its hilarious. Just look up any celebrity to watch the fireworks fly and the salty rivers flow!

This one however is the only one that actually stings...
shit....png

For Pete's sake Mark. There's better reasons to disapprove of the guy rather than falling for blatant bs and spreading propaganda. Also how the fuck did Jim Carrey get 137k likes? And wasn't he being hated by feminists for the controversy surrounding his ex-girlfriend a few months back? Yet now he's siding with the people who gave him so much shit. The fuck is wrong with celebrities? I might as well take another example from the modern left playbook and drop a Harry Potter reference: Its just like how JK Rowling pandered to SJW idiots only for it to bite her in the ass and have them criticize her at any given injustice yet she continues to try and appease them. Fame truly is a poison that bloats the ego and clouds the mind while craving more self-destruction.
 
Last edited:
Back