Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
0gL4oxd.jpg
 
there full moto is “Believe the Victim... not the evidence... or your own lying eyes! Or Else!”

That kind of mentality is what we see in fascism, is what we see in extremist, oppressive societies and governments. Is what we see in countries where the court and religion are one and the same.

Being punished through unproven accusations, accusations imposed, not by logic, by reality, by a fair trial, but imposed by ideologies, beliefs, flawed and bias ideals. That's what extremist, fascists, uncivilized people do.
This people are so disconnected from reality, from common sense they are incapable of seeing how hypocritical they are.
 
What about this?

Jesus what a thing to lay eyes on right after I wake up on a peaceful Saturday. These protesters are disgusting assholes. I'm all about the right to peacefully protest (Soros supported or not) but that bitch is an act of war, holy shit.
 
Jesus what a thing to lay eyes on right after I wake up on a peaceful Saturday. These protesters are disgusting assholes. I'm all about the right to peacefully protest (Soros supported or not) but that bitch is an act of war, holy shit.
Important to note that this was from a different protest entirely. If I'm not mistaken it was some pussy riot thing in russia but I could be mistaken, though I do know its not for the Kavanaugh meme.
 

Actually, ALL men took up the mantle of victimhood on this one, not just whites or republicans. And they were joined by their wives, and mothers, and daughters too.

Because they all realize that coming at someone with unproven and indeed, un-provable sexual assault claims that were so vague some didn't even know if it was a groping or a rape (and said furthermore it didn't matter, both were the same) is patently unjust, the very definition of being, well, a victim. If their Dad, or husband, or son can be tossed in jail or have thier reputation ruined because a person pops out of the woodwork and says the magic "R" word... then nobody is safe.

Rights to innocence cannot be abridged because some crimes are just "more" wrong than others, you can toss a traffic ticket as easily as a murder charge if there's no proof, and that's how it should be.

Sex crimes cannot be this exception where mere suspicion is enough.

An unjust system is unjust, and all can see that. And one that denies Due Process for muh feels is as unjust as you can get.

The progressive stack is as bankrupt an idea as Jim Crow, it doesn't get better because your personal politics align with the notion "all men are rapists" instead of "the black man is an inferior violent simpleton"
 
Last edited:
Appoint a liberal judge to own the liberals goy. Wouldn't it just be epic and own teh libs if you appointed a liberal judge.
No. that's stupid. The left never extends an olive branch, and why should the conservatives for no fucking reason. Why should any party that controls the senate extend an olive branch when it comes to SC appointments? The Democrats have an insane activist judicial philosophy in which they ram things through the courts that they know people don't really want and they can't get through the legislative branch as is intended. The conservatives largely stick to the original wording and meaning of the constitution (textualism/originalism). We wouldn't get goodwill and we wouldn't get what we wanted ruling wise. I can't tell if you haven't thought this through, have been brainwashed by some shill, or if you are being paid by someone to be that stupid. Guess what, I want a conservative to actually win and appoint conservative Judges. Amy Coney Barrett is perfect for that role if it opens up.

As you would expect, Australia peddles the mainstream media version of whatever the US media says, because the western media is such a ratking, but media outlets in Japan and the light coverage it's had in SK, is non-partisan.
The reaction I've received from Japanese who I've explained it to is more along the lines of American politics is very dirty, we expect that. If there's no proof, it's not true, to listen and believe is absurd. It's very hard to explain the current American political climate to people, but this is going to stand as a very obvious good example of the insanity and tricks that identity political types are adhering to. The best way for them to understand is to take the concepts of "left and right" out and lump ID politics all into one barrel and everyone else who is reasonably sane and logical as "everyone else".
Leftist lesbian feminists/troons or Alt Right women hating faggot incels, Neo-Nazi or White hating POC, it doesn't matter anymore, they use the same arguments, they hate the same things, they're all the same, so they go into one barrel. It simplifies stuff that way and it makes it certainly easier to digest for people outside of the western political cone of stupidity.
Let's not pretend neonazis, et al and progressive intersectionality fuck whitey types are even remotely similar in number. Let's also not pretend they want the same things; that is one of the things that got Sargon laughed out of politics. The only similarity is that both are identitiarian and both are largely authoritarian.

It's unbelievable the media gets away with lying like this. By witness they mean guy who was told about it, and by before Judge Kavanaugh was nominated they mean days after Kennedy stepped down and Kavanaugh was clearly gonna be appointed.
 
No. that's stupid. The left never extends an olive branch, and why should the conservatives for no fucking reason. Why should any party that controls the senate extend an olive branch when it comes to SC appointments? The Democrats have an insane activist judicial philosophy in which they ram things through the courts that they know people don't really want and they can't get through the legislative branch as is intended. The conservatives largely stick to the original wording and meaning of the constitution (textualism/originalism). We wouldn't get goodwill and we wouldn't get what we wanted ruling wise. I can't tell if you haven't thought this through, have been brainwashed by some shill, or if you are being paid by someone to be that stupid. Guess what, I want a conservative to actually win and appoint conservative Judges. Amy Coney Barrett is perfect for that role if it opens up.


Let's not pretend neonazis, et al and progressive intersectionality fuck whitey types are even remotely similar in number. Let's also not pretend they want the same things; that is one of the things that got Sargon laughed out of politics. The only similarity is that both are identitiarian and both are largely authoritarian.


It's unbelievable the media gets away with lying like this. By witness they mean guy who was told about it, and by before Judge Kavanaugh was nominated they mean days after Kennedy stepped down and Kavanaugh was clearly gonna be appointed.
Chill dude. It was sarcasm. And the idea of whether the left would suddenly find that said candidate was now guilty of horrible things now that they had been tainted by Trump. Plus the reeing about replacing a woman with a guy. I’d rather have Amy Barrett, the screeching would be just as loud.
 
The Resistance is imploding in a spasm of blue hair, soy shakes, mental illness, mutilated genitals, venereal disease, exposed subversion, Silicon Valley censorship, conspicuous Soros money, blatant fakenews lying and ineffective public reeeee'ing.
And it all comes tumbling down...
Why do I get the feeling that the male #CancelKavanaugh slackivists castrated themselves and sacrificed their dicks at the altar of feminism?
Fun fact: there are goddess cults in certain parts of feminism. Just so you know.
 
Chill dude. It was sarcasm. And the idea of whether the left would suddenly find that said candidate was now guilty of horrible things now that they had been tainted by Trump. Plus the reeing about replacing a woman with a guy. I’d rather have Amy Barrett, the screeching would be just as loud.

If we could just dig up a gay, black, female conservative somewhere. The hilarity.
 
No. that's stupid. The left never extends an olive branch, and why should the conservatives for no fucking reason. Why should any party that controls the senate extend an olive branch when it comes to SC appointments? The Democrats have an insane activist judicial philosophy in which they ram things through the courts that they know people don't really want and they can't get through the legislative branch as is intended. The conservatives largely stick to the original wording and meaning of the constitution (textualism/originalism). We wouldn't get goodwill and we wouldn't get what we wanted ruling wise. I can't tell if you haven't thought this through, have been brainwashed by some shill, or if you are being paid by someone to be that stupid. Guess what, I want a conservative to actually win and appoint conservative Judges. Amy Coney Barrett is perfect for that role if it opens up.


Let's not pretend neonazis, et al and progressive intersectionality fuck whitey types are even remotely similar in number. Let's also not pretend they want the same things; that is one of the things that got Sargon laughed out of politics. The only similarity is that both are identitiarian and both are largely authoritarian.


It's unbelievable the media gets away with lying like this. By witness they mean guy who was told about it, and by before Judge Kavanaugh was nominated they mean days after Kennedy stepped down and Kavanaugh was clearly gonna be appointed.

At the end of the day differing political factions need to share the same country. We can't find ourselves in a position where one side is totally shut out of the conversation. That is how civil wars start. There is also the issue that without a meaningful opposition to policy, the ruling faction could very well go too far as it has ideological blinkers on. Its seems to me though that the so called "Sensible left" is moving into the Republicans tent, which means going foreword the actual ideological debates will occur within the Republican party rather then in the elections, which has its own issues. Hopefully the Democrats sort themselves out and try and isolate the identitarians in their ranks. If they don't they will continue to hemorrhage support even as they become increasingly isolated. Which is itself a recipe for violence.
 
Back