Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It will be interesting to see how big a hit Murkowski will take for this. On the one hand, she isn't up for re-election until 2022 so backlash could easily soften by then. On the other, I was under the impression that she was already extremely unpopular throughout most of her state.

She actually lost a primary contest to another Republican in 2010 but managed to win with a somewhat screwy, but still impressive, write-in campaign. Alaska is still stupidly red, so she managed to win pretty thoroughly in 2016 with no in-party challenger to contend with.

I do believe the Republicans would be pretty dumb to not at least try to primary her. They have nothing to really lose, as she's not going to flip party. (it seems like her career would be over in Alaska if she did.)

Untitled-1.png
 
Seeing all the pictures, I feel bad for the cops. They look like they could use a vacation and a drink.

Honestly I think they 're having a blast. Most of the time they are trying prevent tourists from touching the statues and telling people where the bathrooms are. Now they get to watch people make fools of themselves, throw Amy Schumer into a holding cell and get paid overtime to do it.
 
Why is it always Harry Potter? Have these people never read anything else?

On a superficial level the Harry Potter story seems like a weird thing for lefties to latch on to. It's the story of a trust fund kid who goes to an exclusive boarding school that admits people based largely on their bloodline and then he grows up to be a cop. It makes no sense. on the surface, but the meta-story of Harry Potter is about the legitimacy of the school (the modern college campus) as the rightful arbiter of cultural norms. Even when the Ministry of Magic itself is compromised (Trump/Voldemort gaining control of the government), it is the plucky students who spearhead the rebellion against He who must not be named and ultimately triumph. This I think is an adequate explanation for why shitlibs latch onto Potter as a sort of foundational myth.

So many of these people seem to be outright in love with the idea of being a "survivor". I swear there's something in that word that seduces them. They take this trauma in their pasts, whether real or imagined, and magnify it and enshrine it and worship it. It's like a god to them. Worse, I get the sense that many of them crave that status on some level. Like a drug. It gives me the heebies.

I see the "survivor" as a perversion of the hero archetype. The Hero is a person who suffers greatly in order to secure a better future for his people. and thus is regarded as noble and virtuous. the survivor has also suffered greatly, but not of his own will. Being a survivor or a victim just means that you got shit on by someone more powerful than yourself. Getting your ass kicked doesn't make you special. It doesn't grant one the same status as one who has willingly volunteered himself to get shit on in pursuit of a greater good. It's convenient to conflate the two, because then all you have to do to be a hero is get your ass kicked, which is about the easiest thing there is. The problem is if you try and use your status as a survivor/victim to lay claim to heroism, you rightfully earn the scorn of anyone with an ounce of real virtue.
 
It will be interesting to see how big a hit Murkowski will take for this. On the one hand, she isn't up for re-election until 2022 so backlash could easily soften by then. On the other, I was under the impression that she was already extremely unpopular throughout most of her state.

She actually lost a primary contest to another Republican in 2010 but managed to win with a somewhat screwy, but still impressive, write-in campaign. Alaska is still stupidly red, so she managed to win pretty thoroughly in 2016 with no in-party challenger to contend with.

I do believe the Republicans would be pretty dumb to not at least try to primary her. They have nothing to really lose, as she's not going to flip party. (it seems like her career would be over in Alaska if she did.)


Yeah basically the implication is Palin plans on Primary'ing her out. There is some history there. Murkowski's father fomerly held the Senate seat before becoming Governor. Palin was interviewed for and was the party favorite to be appointed his replacement. Instead he named his daughter to the seat. Palin then proceeded to Primary and defeat him the next Governors election. So Palin is one well known local who could send her packing.
 
accuser1.png

https://www.motherjones.com/politic...-debbie-ramirez-statement-drunk-college-kids/ - http://archive.is/CBbbj
In a statement released Saturday, Deborah Ramirez—who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her while the two were at Yale—said senators, like her classmates at Yale, are “deliberately ignoring [Kavanaugh’s] behavior.”

“I feel like I’m right back at Yale where half the room is laughing and looking the other way…This is how victims are isolated and silenced,” she said.

The Senate is expected to confirm Kavanaugh Saturday, with a vote set to happen midafternoon Eastern time.

Although the weeks building up to Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote have been painful for survivors of sexual assault, Ramirez ends her statement on a hopeful note, saying, “There may be people with power who are looking the other way, but there are millions more who are standing together, speaking up about personal experiences of sexual violence and taking action to support survivors.”

Here is her full statement:

Thirty-five years ago, the other students in the room chose to laugh and look the other way as sexual violence was perpetrated on me by Brett Kavanaugh. As I watch many of the Senators speak and vote on the floor of the Senate I feel like I’m right back at Yale where half the room is laughing and looking the other way. Only this time, instead of drunk college kids, it is US Senators who are deliberately ignoring his behavior. This is how victims are isolated and silenced.

But I do have corroborating witnesses speaking for me, although they were not allowed to speak to the FBI, and I feel extremely grateful for them and for the overwhelming amount of support that I have received and continue to receive during this extremely difficult and painful time. There may be people with power who are looking the other way, but there are millions more who are standing together, speaking up about personal experiences of sexual violence and taking action to support survivors. This is truly a collective moment of survivors and allies standing together.

Thank you for hearing me, seeing me and believing me. I am grateful for each and every one of you. We will not be silenced.

We stand in truth and light,

Debbie Ramirez
(pronouns she, her, hers)

Yes, the article even states her fucking pronouns :story:
 
Here's are all the photos I've compiled from the Kavanaugh protest.
View attachment 561190 View attachment 561196 View attachment 561193 View attachment 561194 View attachment 561199 View attachment 561200 View attachment 561201 View attachment 561202 View attachment 561203 View attachment 561204 View attachment 561205 View attachment 561206 View attachment 561207 View attachment 561208 View attachment 561209 View attachment 561210 View attachment 561211 View attachment 561212 View attachment 561214 View attachment 561216 View attachment 561217 View attachment 561218 View attachment 561219 View attachment 561220 View attachment 561221 View attachment 561222 View attachment 561223 View attachment 561224 View attachment 561225 View attachment 561226 View attachment 561227 View attachment 561228 View attachment 561229 View attachment 561230 View attachment 561231 View attachment 561232 View attachment 561233 View attachment 561234 View attachment 561235 View attachment 561236 View attachment 561237 View attachment 561238 View attachment 561239 View attachment 561241 View attachment 561242 View attachment 561243 View attachment 561244 View attachment 561245 View attachment 561246 View attachment 561247 View attachment 561248 View attachment 561249 View attachment 561250 View attachment 561251 View attachment 561252 View attachment 561253 View attachment 561254 View attachment 561255 View attachment 561256 View attachment 561257 View attachment 561258 View attachment 561259 View attachment 561261 View attachment 561262 View attachment 561263 View attachment 561264 View attachment 561265 View attachment 561266 View attachment 561267 View attachment 561268 View attachment 561269 View attachment 561270 View attachment 561271 View attachment 561272 View attachment 561273 View attachment 561274 View attachment 561275 View attachment 561276 View attachment 561277 View attachment 561278 View attachment 561280 View attachment 561282

I don't know why but looking at all those images reminded me of this song. Maybe I just feel extra fucking blessed today because of all the sperging. Maybe it's because I'm drinking in celebration of Kavanaugh and all the salt flowing. Maybe both.
 
It would be interesting if Amy Barret is nominated next. Rape would be difficult, maybe being a pedo? Accusing her of being a lesbian could boomerang back at them. Hmmm, what else can be flung at a woman. I mean sure they’ll insult her looks and intelligence as a given, but sex crimes is a bit difficult.

Amy Barrett's Catholic background/upbringing was a big sticking point for Feinstein in her 7th Circuit Confirmation hearing.

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Barrett Responses to Feinstein QFRs.pdf

While the full effects of Feinstein's actions during Kavanaugh's hearing are yet to be determined, I don't imagine she stays around long given her age.

Personally, I'd like for Barrett to have a few more years on the 7th Circuit. I feel the same way about Allison Eid who took over Gorsuch's old spot on the 10th.

If Trump were to replace Ginsburg with another female, Margaret A. Ryan (currently serving on the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces) could be the simplest route.

https://www.congress.gov/109/chrg/shrg36311/CHRG-109shrg36311.pdf

Her part is from pg. 495 to pg. 528 but it also has Scott Stucky in there as well.

After her, the most experienced is Sykes but she'd be more contested than Barrett. Larsen could be an acceptable medium with her written work leaning in line with Scalia and Roberts but not having any rulings on any of the hot button issues.
 
Hollywood's releasing a film adaptation of The Man In The High Castle. You can bet that the people involved are going to say it's "current" and "relevant in 2018" while normies are going to say it "perfectly" captures what Trump's administration is. Sales of the book are going to increase too, and it will become the new Harry Potter/Handmaid's Tale.

I heard that sales for Orwell's 1984 spiked when Trump was elected, which doesn't make sense at all given that the US isn't the burgeoning digital dictatorship that is China. They've already begun trialling their 'social credit' system which brings them one step closer to Orwell's authoritarian world.

You're a little late. The posters and ads you're seeing are for the third season of the show on Amazon. One season came out pre-Trump, the second came out after Trump was elected (although it was produced before). Narratively, the show has kind of moved past where comparisons with Trump's America would make sense, so if we haven't heard them yet, we probably never will.
 
View attachment 561345
https://www.motherjones.com/politic...-debbie-ramirez-statement-drunk-college-kids/ - http://archive.is/CBbbj
In a statement released Saturday, Deborah Ramirez—who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her while the two were at Yale—said senators, like her classmates at Yale, are “deliberately ignoring [Kavanaugh’s] behavior.”

“I feel like I’m right back at Yale where half the room is laughing and looking the other way…This is how victims are isolated and silenced,” she said.

The Senate is expected to confirm Kavanaugh Saturday, with a vote set to happen midafternoon Eastern time.

Although the weeks building up to Kavanaugh’s confirmation vote have been painful for survivors of sexual assault, Ramirez ends her statement on a hopeful note, saying, “There may be people with power who are looking the other way, but there are millions more who are standing together, speaking up about personal experiences of sexual violence and taking action to support survivors.”

Here is her full statement:

Thirty-five years ago, the other students in the room chose to laugh and look the other way as sexual violence was perpetrated on me by Brett Kavanaugh. As I watch many of the Senators speak and vote on the floor of the Senate I feel like I’m right back at Yale where half the room is laughing and looking the other way. Only this time, instead of drunk college kids, it is US Senators who are deliberately ignoring his behavior. This is how victims are isolated and silenced.

But I do have corroborating witnesses speaking for me, although they were not allowed to speak to the FBI, and I feel extremely grateful for them and for the overwhelming amount of support that I have received and continue to receive during this extremely difficult and painful time. There may be people with power who are looking the other way, but there are millions more who are standing together, speaking up about personal experiences of sexual violence and taking action to support survivors. This is truly a collective moment of survivors and allies standing together.

Thank you for hearing me, seeing me and believing me. I am grateful for each and every one of you. We will not be silenced.

We stand in truth and light,

Debbie Ramirez
(pronouns she, her, hers)

Yes, the article even states her fucking pronouns :story:
Dicks out for Kavanaugh.
 
The vote was 50 - 48 i believe there are 100 senators so did 2 abstain? i know it means nothing but its been bugging me for a bit.

The R vote (I forget his name) had his daughter's wedding today and abstained, and found a Democrat friend (I think from Montana?) who agreed to mutually abstain since neither of their votes would change the final outcome.

Edit: thinking more about it, that was actually a really nice gesture of bipartisanship in the Senate and I really wish we could have more of that sentiment going forward.
 
Last edited:
The vote was 50 - 48 i believe there are 100 senators so did 2 abstain? i know it means nothing but its been bugging me for a bit.

One who was going to vote yes (Daines, R-MT) had to attend his daughter's wedding. He worked it out with one who was going to vote no (Murkowski, R-AK) so that she would abstain and the vote would be the same.
 
One who was going to vote yes (Daines, R-MT) had to attend his daughter's wedding. He worked it out with one who was going to vote no (Murkowski, R-AK) so that she would abstain and the vote would be the same.
That's quite usual- its pairing. Not sure how it's viewed in the US, but breaking a pair in the UK is seen as a serious violation of parliamentary tradition, enough to trigger inquiries if used in very serious matters.

Wouldn't have mattered if she broke it though. At least some form of decency arose from this circus.
 
A republican had to be at his daughter's wedding so a democrat did him a favour and voted "Present". So the votes were the same basically, theyncancthey each other out. He did him a favour in other words.

Edit: ninja'd
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Spooky
Back