Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will remind you that this exceptional individual won a Nobel peace prize... By the nature of simply by being slightly darker skinned than the previous holders of his office. (Additional reminder: The dude was half white)

Watch the very same people neglect to give Trump one after he almost single-handedly ends the Korean war once and for all.

Yeah, except joking about murdering people with drones is funny. I found his joke great, how often has a president outright threatened the audience with automated death? I can't recall any since Reagan.
 
I can't believe these people are making more promises they won't keep I still haven't seen a single tranny death camp yet and they assured me that Trump would make millions of them. Now they are promising civil war 2, how can I report them to Kickstarter for being a blatent scam?

Edit: And don't get me started on the Impeachment stretch goal they keep saying it's coming but it's years overdue.
 
43350176_10217339276576762_2106332239192129536_n.jpg
20181007_050856.jpg


SCREECH EVEN HARDER!
20181007_050954.png

Surely you'll get your way if you keep it up.
 
"We need someone to watch, please god we'll say whatever you want" - SNL 2018

How long before SNL is just one guy reading trending tweets and making a silly face after?
You got Chevy Chase saying it's turned into garbage. The same guy that hoped SNL convinced people to vote for Carter. Of course, he was actually funny and Carter is doing good work -- shame it took him getting out of his presidency to do so.
 
Those limpwristed fucks want a war feel free to send them this little gem from their boy after blowing up that muslim wedding:

Hey, I'm no fan of the Democrats but when it comes to Obama upping the drone strike rate on terrorist scum I'm reminded of Deng Xiaoping's famous quote "No matter if it is a white cat or a black cat; as long as it can catch mice, it is a good cat".
 
Time to change the subtitle I think.

Also, laugh as Kavanaugh does nothing towards Roe v Wade.

That's just going to be the longest shit show. More than likely it'll be a case that works its way up through the court system and all along the way it's going to be the media accusing someone of being an abusive misogynist, then it'll be another circus side show all during the hearings and deliberations.

Just an absolute shit show. I look forward to it, though, because this kind of thing needs to happen. We've been appeasing these people for way too long, and they got their way for too long, now they've got to grow up and realize that just because they yell about it on TV doesn't make it true or accurate.
 
The inability of Leftists on this point to even admit that there is enough ambiguity around the Kavanaugh charges to think a reasonable person could believe against them has me thinking more and more of Alasdair MacIntyre (or at least what I remember from reading a few chapters of his stuff and watching some lectures a few years ago - so I caveat my understanding of his positions). He is often identified as Counter-Enlightenment, which isn't quite right - from memory he does not doubt the probative value of science and reason. Rather, he thinks that they do not and cannot drive societies. Cultural and societal change and conflict is instead driven by emotions and happenstance. (echoes of David Hume are obvious here, although he was speaking of human beings individually moreso than polities) He is extremely pessimistic of hope for our current society (he was writing this a few decades ago); instead, his advice is simply to hunker down and wait out the new Dark Age until reason and evidence are again en vogue. Patrick Deneen is a Christian philosopher currently at the height of his powers who makes a similar argument. A quick google turned up the most well-known quote of MacIntyre which encapsulates some of his thinking:

A crucial turning point in that earlier history occurred when men and women of good will turned aside from the task of shoring up the Roman imperium and ceased to identify the continuation of civility and moral community with the maintenance of that imperium. What they set themselves to achieve instead . . . was the construction of new forms of community within which the moral life could be sustained so that both morality and civility might survive the coming ages of barbarism and darkness. If my account of our moral condition is correct, we ought also to conclude that for some time now we too have reached that turning point. . . . This time however the barbarians are not waiting beyond the frontiers; they have already been governing us for quite some time. And it is our lack of consciousness of this that constitutes part of our predicament. We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another—doubtless quite different—St. Benedict.

Edit: Apparently my memory on some of his reasoning is pretty off and I suspect I am running his thinking together with other things I was reading at the time.
 
Last edited:
No, that's Bulbagarden. I don't know the full details
Arent Bulbagarden just the forums of Bulbapedia? Its a system of "bulba" sites all under the same administration from what I understand. And from what I recall theyre part of an even bigger wikiautist group known as NIWA which is a collection of Nintendo wiki obsessed autists that includes the autismfest known as Mario Wiki.
 
Back