Law Justice Brett Kavanaugh Megathread - Megathread for Brett Kavanaugh, US Supreme Court Justice

they're good justices, brentt

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-picks-brett-kavanaugh-for-supreme-court.html

President Donald Trump has picked Brett Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, NBC News reported.

Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security. The favorite of White House Counsel Donald McGahn, Kavanaugh is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices who were on the president’s shortlist.

A graduate of Yale Law School who serves on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has the traditional trappings of a presidential nominee to the high court.


If confirmed, the appellate judge would become the second young, conservative jurist Trump has put on the top U.S. court during his first term. Kavanaugh's confirmation would give the president an even bigger role in shaping U.S. policy for decades to come. The potential to morph the federal judiciary led many conservatives to support Trump in 2016, and he has not disappointed so far with the confirmation of conservative Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and numerous federal judges.

At times, he has diverged from the Republican party’s ideological line on important cases that have come before him, including on the Affordable Care Act, the 2010 health care law which Kavanaugh has declined to strike down on a number of occasions in which it has come before him.

Anti-abortion groups quietly lobbied against Kavanaugh, pushing instead for another jurist on Trump’s shortlist, 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, ABC News reported in the run-up to Trump’s announcement.

Kavanaugh received his current appointment in 2006 after five years in the George W. Bush administration, where he served in a number of roles including staff secretary to the president. He has been criticized for his attachment to Bush, as well as his involvement in a number of high-profile legal cases.

For instance, Kavanaugh led the investigation into the death of Bill Clinton’s Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, and assisted in Kenneth Starr’s 1998 report outlining the case for Clinton’s impeachment.

Democrats criticized Kavanaugh’s political roles during his 2006 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Your experience has been most notable, not so much for your blue chip credentials, but for the undeniably political nature of so many of your assignments,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said at the time.

“From the notorious Starr report, to the Florida recount, to the President’s secrecy and privilege claims, to post-9/11 legislative battles including the Victims Compensation Fund, to ideological judicial nomination fights, if there has been a partisan political fight that needed a very bright legal foot soldier in the last decade, Brett Kavanaugh was probably there,” Schumer said.

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr report has been scrutinized by Republicans who have said it could pose trouble for the president as he negotiates with special counsel Robert Mueller over the terms of a possible interview related to Mueller's Russia probe. The 1998 document found that Clinton's multiple refusals to testify to a grand jury in connection with Starr's investigation were grounds for impeachment.

In later years, Kavanaugh said that Clinton should not have had to face down an investigation during his presidency. He has said the indictment of a president would not serve the public interest.

Like Trump's first nominee to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh clerked for Kennedy. If he is confirmed, it will mark the first time ever that a current or former Supreme Court justice has two former clerks become justices, according to an article by Adam Feldman, who writes a blog about the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh teaches courses on the separation of powers, the Supreme Court, and national security at Harvard Law School and Yale Law School, and does charitable work at St. Maria’s Meals program at Catholic Charities in Washington, D.C., according to his official biography.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ett-kavanaugh-nomination-by-a-28-point-margin

After a blistering confirmation battle, Justice Brett Kavanaugh will take his seat for oral arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court with a skeptical public, a majority of which opposed his nomination. However, Democrats may not be able to exploit this fact in the upcoming elections as much as they hope, because the independent voters overwhelmingly disapprove of their own handling of the nomination by a 28-point margin, a new CNN/SSRS poll finds.

Overall, just 41 percent of those polled said they wanted to see Kavanaugh confirmed, compared to 51 percent who said they opposed his confirmation. In previous CNN polls dating back to Robert Bork in 1987, no nominee has been more deeply underwater.

What's interesting, however, is even though Democrats on the surface would seem to have public opinion on their side, just 36 percent approved of how they handled the nomination, compared to 56 percent who disapproved. (Republicans were at 55 percent disapproval and 35 percent approval). A further breakdown finds that 58 percent of independents disapproved of the way the Democrats handled the nomination — compared to 30 percent who approved. (Independents also disapproved of Republicans handling of the matter, but by a narrower 53 percent to 32 percent margin).

Many people have strong opinions on the way the Kavanaugh nomination will play out in November and who it will benefit. The conventional wisdom is that it will help Democrats in the House, where there are a number of vulnerable Republicans in suburban districts where losses among educated women could be devastating, and that it will help Republicans in the Senate, where the tossup races are in red states where Trump and Kavanaugh are more popular.

That said, it's clear that the nomination energized both sides, and that the tactics pursued by the parties turned off independent voters in a way that makes it much harder to predict how this will end up affecting election outcomes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lmao if you think Roe v Wade was a shit argument read more into Brown vs Board of Education. You may think that decision declared separate and equal unconstitutional and all racial based discrimination void as a result, but actually it ruled only discrimination that resulted in feelings of inferiority was unconstitutional.

Wrap your brain around that one.
not to mention that school 'integration' was carried out at literal gun point by the national guard. people didn't want it and had to be forced to accept it.
 
Oh this is hilarious. On Day 1 Kavanaugh hires more Black law clerks than Ginsberg has in her career, and he hires a full female staff of clerks. The first to do so. Somebody is sending a number of messages.
“Something something wants to lord over blacks something something feel superior to women, so he’s clearly racist and sexist”

...is what I expect the response to that information being.
 
The thing is, all the moderate dems and single-issue dems left the party a while ago, followed by the southern dems and oldschoolers. 2016 drove away both any remaining classic Liberals and the not-completely-insane Progressives (there were a few), and this basically chased off anyone remotely sane who was left. Even the ones that hated Kavanaugh and found him abhorrent didn't want to burn fucking due process to the ground in the process, and I saw even a smattering of die-hard Social Justice advocates stop for a moment and go: "You know what? This is a shit show. I want no part of this," meaning this fuck-up was hard enough to defeat Autism for several minutes and allow rational thought in.

The blue wave is dead, and the establishment Democrats have killed it.
I agree 100% but can you really say the that the Blue Wave was even alive in the first place?
It was mostly just hot air and cherry picked polling samples. Only thing thats changed is that now even the likes of CNN are admitting that the Dems fucked up bad.
 
Last edited:
“Something something wants to lord over blacks something something feel superior to women, so he’s clearly racist and sexist”

...is what I expect the response to that information being.

If Kav has a staff of all white dudes = "This proves his sexism and racism!!"

If Kav has a staff of mostly white dudes and some women = "This proves his sexism by having just one token female who is a traitor to women!"

If Kav's staff is 50% dudes, 50% women = "This is obviously a ploy to silence our anger!!"

If Kav's staff was nothing but women! = "Sexist pig dog, employing women so he can walk around like a rooster in the hen house!"

If Kav's staff was entirely people on the not-white persuasion = "He is just reenacting slavery by having these people work under him! Slavery still exists!!"

If Kav's staff is nothing but every color under the sun, a quadriplegic, and a gender fluid space alien = "He is just pandering! They're all Uncle Toms and they don't exist - they are nonpeople garbage!"

Basically no matter what he does, people are going to bitch and moan. He might as well just, y'know, do his job, and wait for a couple more weeks before they get distracted by sexism caused by pumpkin spice or racism caused by traffic cones or transphobia caused by even numbers.
 
There are medical cases where an abortion is necessary -- stillborn child, ectopic pregnancy, etc. In those cases, it's a sad but necessary action unless you want the woman to die (which, contrary to lefties' hallucinations, most conservatives and pro-life types don't want).

However, the casual 'get my uterus vacuumed out' mentality is pretty appalling, and it's why resistance to abortion has crystallized so strongly and refused to die off.

The left also loves to conflate birth control and abortion. They're faggots in that way.
There is a more legitimate reason than created from whole cloth privacy rights for abortion, at least in the case of non-consensual pregnancies - self defense. No one has a right to put you in mortal peril without your own say. That's the reasoning behind most hard core pro-lifers always agreeing to exceptions for rape, incest, health of the mother, etc. It's pretty hard to argue against in Enlightenment type liberalism.

Also, as with anything else, prohibition just never works. Any position solely based on idealism never does. Putting research dollars into ways to limit the impact is the best bang for the buck. Make sure as many as possible are worked out before there are detectable brain waves or whatever line seems best.
 
I think the dems themselves know it, though. That's why they are so frothing at the mouth angry over losing the POTUS and SCOTUS in one 2 year window.

They know the only hope of keeping the red yokels down is Executive Order and favorable libetal interpretation of all law, without that, they've got nothing to stop their rotten local bases from falling out from under them and collapsing the party.

If anything its already happening with the ortez chick or whatever her name is. The one who's actually hardcore socialist who kicked the door lightly on the local party and watched it collapse.
 
I'm in favour of legal abortion so long as it's done before the foetus is in fact viable and suchlike. Better it be done above board and legally and properly and subject to regulatory oversight than that business with a coat hanger or some creephat in Mexico. I don't think it's a slippery slope to eugenics; that way conspiratarding lies. I do think, though, it shouldn't be something decided on a whim, there should be some consultation standards and making people think about it first the same way one would with any other surgical procedure.
 
not to mention that school 'integration' was carried out at literal gun point by the national guard. people didn't want it and had to be forced to accept it.

State mandated racial segregation is patently unconstitutional though, even with a constructionist reading of the wording and intent of the 14th amendment. Its gets a tad dicier when its privately owned entitites (like lunch counters) doing the segregation, but keep in mind those things are banned by legislation written by Congress (under the 14th amendments authority) rather then judicial fiat, so there is not much issue there either.

With respect to the "point of a gun" thing, Eisenhower had every right to do so. The State of Arkansas refused to obey a Federal court order and even mobilized armed deputies of its government to block the implementation of said Federal order. It went well beyond the bounds of the States lawful power and was borderline seditious in nature. Sending in the 101st airborne with orders to make the judgement stick was a mild response. Eisenhower could have sent them in with orders to arrest the Governor himself and have his ass hauled to a military prison pending trial for seditious conspiracy against the United States.
 
If anything its already happening with the ortez chick or whatever her name is. The one who's actually hardcore socialist who kicked the door lightly on the local party and watched it collapse.

Keep an eye on her. The old guy is still on the ballot since NY allows a candidate to be listed for multiple parties. He had already won one of the minor parties primaries before Cortez showed up. Don’t be surprised if the locals don’t pick him instead. Or if his presence on the ballot splits the Dem vote and ends up electing the GOP guy (a centrist Professor from St JOHN’S University... Who is also a batshit insane MRA... where the hell do they find these people?)
 
Keep an eye on her. The old guy is still on the ballot since NY allows a candidate to be listed for multiple parties. He had already won one of the minor parties primaries before Cortez showed up. Don’t be surprised if the locals don’t pick him instead. Or if his presence on the ballot splits the Dem vote and ends up electing the GOP guy (a centrist Professor from St JOHN’S University... Who is also a batshit insane MRA... where the hell do they find these people?)
Meh the only people who run against the party in some of these deep red or blue areas are often insane. Same with some of the people who try to primary a popular candidate in their party. Running against the establishment is often necessary, but just as often it isn't and only crazy people do it. Something that somehow got lost in the whole Kavanaugh debacle is how standard/establishment of a candidate he was. I imagine that is part of the reason the FBI said, "lol no" to the Democrats
 
State mandated racial segregation is patently unconstitutional though, even with a constructionist reading of the wording and intent of the 14th amendment. Its gets a tad dicier when its privately owned entitites (like lunch counters) doing the segregation, but keep in mind those things are banned by legislation written by Congress (under the 14th amendments authority) rather then judicial fiat, so there is not much issue there either.

With respect to the "point of a gun" thing, Eisenhower had every right to do so. The State of Arkansas refused to obey a Federal court order and even mobilized armed deputies of its government to block the implementation of said Federal order. It went well beyond the bounds of the States lawful power and was borderline seditious in nature. Sending in the 101st airborne with orders to make the judgement stick was a mild response. Eisenhower could have sent them in with orders to arrest the Governor himself and have his ass hauled to a military prison pending trial for seditious conspiracy against the United States.

You wonder why people looked at the supreme commander of the Allied forces in WW2 and thought, “Him there, he looks like a guy to fuck with”
 
Meh the only people who run against the party in some of these deep red or blue areas are often insane. Same with some of the people who try to primary a popular candidate in their party.

It worked for Dave Bratt though. I still laugh every time I see his "vote for me" signs. Eric Cantor gerrymandered his district so well he made sure there were no Democrat votes in it at all, and so when a rifle thumping Ayn Rand Acolyte whose only claim to fame was being a economics professor at a community college came along he got primaried out of office since there were no voters to vote "the lesser of two evils". Shakespearing ending. Don't feel bad for him though, he's collecting 7 figures as a wall street lobbyist.
 
There are two cases coming up pertaining to planned parenthood access to public funds. This topic could stay open forever if they go the way I think they might go.

More to come on Tuesday if they accept the case(s) from the lower courts.

That being said, the court could also accept hearing less contentious cases in order to scrub the optics of this whole circus.

The SCOTUS is fairly capricious so who knows?
 
Keep an eye on her. The old guy is still on the ballot since NY allows a candidate to be listed for multiple parties. He had already won one of the minor parties primaries before Cortez showed up. Don’t be surprised if the locals don’t pick him instead. Or if his presence on the ballot splits the Dem vote and ends up electing the GOP guy (a centrist Professor from St JOHN’S University... Who is also a batshit insane MRA... where the hell do they find these people?)

Alexandria Ocasio-Dumbass isn't even 30 years old and yet she's on the same level as Nancy Pelosi when it comes to sheer unintelligence and unlikability. I'm surprised neither Trump nor any other renown shitlord has yet to point out how Dumbass' eye pupils are always, and I mean ALWAYS unnaturally dilated, which is a clear indication that she dabbles on anti-psychotics or another kind of hard drug.

It's most likely that Joe Crowley will prevail. He's on all sorts of top-tier caucuses on Congress that his district benefits from immensely. A vote for Dumbass means the district won't have access to those gibs anymore. It would be pretty lulzy if Anthony Pappas wins, but that is being overly :optimistic: and I have very little faith that Jewtropolis will deliver something that isn't soulless urban mush every now and then.
 
Back