Running Commentary & Internet Bloodsports General - General purpose megathread for discussing current and upcoming livestreams in IBS or otherwise.

Status
Not open for further replies.
j666 said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O'Shaughnessy

>James Patrick O'Shaughnessy (born 1981), American internet aristocrat and prolific deviant art contributor

alright, which one of you faggots did this
Click to expand...
archived for posterity:
https://archive.is/T3Opq#selection-1093.0-1093.106
upload_2018-10-18_16-16-24.png
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BSC, UnKillFill, Wärring Ornac and 27 others
Lysol said:
I don't think someone pointing out that he should take precautions against the possibility of being swatted is a moral argument or "bellyaching" so much as it is good advice, though.
Click to expand...
This is the same stuff that happened in the jim thread, anyone who could be perceived as being on Jim's side in any way, (even the people just saying "if this is true I'll laugh at him but I'm skeptical can we have proof") were called butthurt Jim fanboys even though no one attacked the doxers for trying to dox Jim until after the dox was confirmed.

It seems there is a group of people who really have it out for Jim and try to frame people who don't jump on board their hate bandwagon as rabid fanboys.

Not trying to moralfag or anything, they are welcome to do that here, but I personally think they are just as retarded as the rabid portions of his fanbase who are sperging out over this.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Wärring Ornac, ddlloo, Garth and 18 others
Bob Barker said:
This is the same stuff that happened in the jim thread, anyone who could be perceived as being on Jim's side in any way, (even the people just saying "if this is true I'll laugh at him but I'm skeptical can we have proof") were called butthurt Jim fanboys even though no one attacked the doxers for trying to dox Jim until after the dox was confirmed.

It seems there is a group of people who really have it out for Jim and try to frame people who don't jump on board their hate bandwagon as rabid fanboys.

Not trying to moralfag or anything, they are welcome to do that here, but I personally think they are just as exceptional as the rabid portions of his fanbase who are sperging out over this.
Click to expand...

Exactly. This whole debacle has made me realize the amount of actual edgy faggot NPCs that are on this forum.

The reason why people are hesitant with accepting Metokur's dox is because of the image they project onto him. Metokur, even by his crime record, is a normal guy who openly mocks at the dumb shit on the internet. The average person projects himself/herself onto him in order to interact said absurd stupidity on the internet. And now, with the facade removed, he's just some guy.
"But it's for the lulz nuthugger"
Congratulations, you've fucked over the concept of the average guy on the internet instead of an actual lolcow. You're not smart for finding his dox, you're just an a-log.

Edit: Of course, chat is complaining about how people are irritated about this. It has nothing to do with the person being Metokur. Metokur is replaceable. It's the fact that some of you in chat did it to be a-logs.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Wärring Ornac, Grog, Garth and 12 others
samuraicrack said:
I can’t tell if people suggesting that this is a result of the skeptics doing a Discord ops on him are being ironic or not, because if you aren’t then you’re probably taking this internet shit more seriously than anyone else. It’s pretty clearly just some dude doing basic database research over a name that Jim has openly admitted to having since like 2008.
Click to expand...
So that's Jim's fetish.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lysol, GeneralFriendliness and RedPrince358
yawning sneasel said:
Its a moral argument to bellyache about being doxed bringing him closer to being swatted
Click to expand...
Wait. Aren't you the guy who was literally making deals with autists to prevent them from getting threads here?
Regardless of the fact that no one here has been making a moral argument, I figured you'd be the last person to take issue with one.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Informative
Reactions: Wärring Ornac, ZippyZoopa, GeneralFriendliness and 4 others
Everyones forgotten the big question here and that is:
Are we still keeping the name '⚡weetie ⚡quad of Outer Heaven'?

Because I don't want it to be '⚡weetie⚡quad of uter eaven.'

The least he can do for us is to keep his fucking potato ancestry out of it; I wasn't promised this when I enlisted in his grooming gang.

Edit: FUCK. The O was supposed to be a potato and H was the two beers emojis...
It's not funny now...
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: ZippyZoopa, Lysol, Muffin Slasher and 5 others
Bob Barker said:
Not trying to moralfag or anything, they are welcome to do that here, but I personally think they are just as exceptional as the rabid portions of his fanbase who are sperging out over this.
Click to expand...
Anyone getting huffy over Jim dox, for either...

A. HURR DURR IT WUZ ALREADY THERE LOL! (despite it not really being confirmed until now)

B. REEEEEEEEEEEEE WHY YOU DO THIS? (despite the fact that Jim isn't sacred and there is nothing necessarily wrong with doxing)

C. LOL IT'S ALL FAKE JIM IS 196833-D CHESS GRANDMASTER (even though it's provably real)

...are just retards who clearly don't understand what doxing even is. Take for example, this:
Secret Asshole said:
People thought this was going to be an explosion when his real name has been out for half a decade? Along with his home state? The worst you got on him is a dismissed 16 year old DUI (shocking from a pure Irishman) and some moving violations? Jesus christ that's autistic.

This is the most pathetic fucking dox I've seen. So what did we learn? He's Irish and his name is identical to the one he uses and he lives in the state we already knew he does. Wow. Amazing.

I'm giving this to Anakin Skywalker the Crackhead, because that's more hilarious than this shitshow.
Click to expand...
This is the kind of mentally handicapped shit I would expect from a 3rd grader who thinks doxing is some magical ability to reveal dark secrets about someone that only mystery religion initiates know how to perform. What do you think a "non-pathetic" doxing is? His Social Security and credit card numbers? A rape record? His name on a sex offenders list?

Confirmation bias is a wonderful thing. I bet if Carl Benjamin of Swindon, London's address was revealed right now, you and others would be laughing from now to Sunday. But because it's James O'Shaughnessy, it's time to hoot and holler about how it doesn't matter because it was already there.

eldri said:
Exactly. This whole debacle has made me realize the amount of actual edgy faggot NPCs that are on this forum.

The reason why people are hesitant with accepting Metokur's dox is because of the image they project onto him. Metokur, even by his crime record, is a normal guy who openly mocks at the dumb shit on the internet. The average person projects himself/herself onto him in order to interact said absurd stupidity on the internet. And now, with the facade removed, he's just some guy.
"But it's for the lulz nuthugger"
Congratulations, you've fucked over the concept of the average guy on the internet instead of an actual lolcow. You're not smart for finding his dox, you're just an a-log.
Click to expand...
Then maybe people should stop projecting (their own biases) onto him. This entire Internet Famous subforum exists solely to show that projecting yourself onto an internet personality is pure brainlet.
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: ZippyZoopa, Lysol, Garth and 9 others
yawning sneasel said:
I was?
Click to expand...
It was a question, not an accusation. But yeah, aren't you the staff member who told a lolcow they didn't deserve a thread and then made a call for sympathy because they told you a sad story?

All I'm saying is that if anyone might be swayed by a moral argument, I figured it would be you. It's irrelevant of course, as no one (that I've seen itt) is making a moral argument that doxing Jim is wrong in some way, but still... I guess I find it a bit funny.

Either way, this is obviously a personal gripe and :autism:/:offtopic: as fuck, so let's get back to the potato jokes.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: Wärring Ornac and GeneralFriendliness
Mathas said:
It was a question, not an accusation. But yeah, aren't you the staff member who told a lolcow they didn't deserve a thread and then made a call for sympathy because they told you a sad story?

All I'm saying is that if anyone might be swayed by a moral argument, I figured it would be you. It's irrelevant of course, as no one (that I've seen itt) is making a moral argument that doxing Jim is wrong in some way, but still... I guess I find it a bit funny.
Click to expand...
A dude did when he mentioned it would make him more vulnerable to swatting and no i dont care either way because jim is a lolcow.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Lysol
Iwasamwillbe said:
Then maybe people should stop projecting (their own biases) onto him. This entire Internet Famous subforum exists solely to show that projecting yourself onto an internet personality is pure brainlet.
Click to expand...
No, this entire Internet Famous subforum exists solely to show that projecting yourself onto an exceptional internet personality is pure brainlet.

Everyone project themselves onto others. Don't act like you don't.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: Lysol, Garth, Bob Barker and 1 other person
eldri said:
No, this entire Internet Famous subforum exists solely to show that projecting yourself onto an exceptional internet personality is pure brainlet.
Click to expand...
All internet personalities are exceptional in one way or another.
Everyone project themselves onto others. Don't act like you don't.
Click to expand...
It doesn't make it more rational or reasonable to project in general.
 
yawning sneasel said:
A dude did when he mentioned it would make him more vulnerable to swatting and no i dont care either way because jim is a lolcow.
Click to expand...
I could have missed a post, but the only posts I saw talking about swatting were discussing that he should contact his local PD and be put on a whitelist to help prevent it. That doesn't seem like a moral argument against the dox, but a precaution to deal with the fallout.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lysol, Garth and Bob Barker
Iwasamwillbe said:
I bet if Carl Benjamin of Swindon, London's address was revealed right now, you and others would be laughing from now to Sunday. But because it's James O'Shaughnessy, it's time to hoot and holler about how it doesn't matter because it was already there.
Click to expand...
I know a lot of the fans as well as detractors have been very special about the dox, but that doesn't mean you have to join them.
Isn't Sargin's address already out there?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Bob Barker
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back