I don't think anyone here is suggesting that they hate digital art or that it's a bad medium.
If anything I would say a bigger issue is the community/culture that's come to surround digital art, specifically a
very particular sub-set of the digital art community that's gained more traction as of late now that there's a ton of teens and 20-somethings who've only ever worked digitally (an incidentally has a lot of overlap with the SJW artist communities) but don't really have a proper grasp on the tools or the basics of art to actually use either to their fullest potential. In my experience, such artists tend to not see the point in learning the fundamentals when digital tools can provide so many shortcuts and it makes them extremely stubborn and difficult to teach. They don't see the point in drawing from life (or utilizing the hundreds of online resources that would make life drawing practice for digital art easy) when digital art software typically has layers, opacity settings, and transform tools; they don't see the point in learning color theory or how to blend/color mix when there's an eye dropper, multiply & overlay settings, and a smudge tool; and sometimes they don't see the point in figuring out how do line work and develop habits that are actually more time/energy consuming like doing the same gesture over and over until they make the right line or making a million sketchy lines. It also seems to be the origin of a lot of bad artistic advice that gets passed around in circles like Tumblr - majority of the time an artist claims that straight up tracing is "valid," it's a digital artist saying it.
With the Inktober debacle the artists who screamed the loudest were the exact kind of artists who exemplified all these bad habits, complete with bombarding the host Jake Parker with before/after shots of their art similar to
this one that only served to prove Parker's point. And they wouldn't be SJWs without a healthy dose of baseless accusations in the form of calling traditional art ableist and classist, even though none of these complainers were actually disabled (or were """disabled""" due to their own bad art habits) and the supposed cost effectiveness of digital art is practically non-existent nowadays with how many art programs are defaulting to a subscription plan, the combined cost of a computer, tablet, & necessary storage, and I've noticed a lot of the Tumblr artists who make this claim often have someone else (namely parents) footing the bills for the heaviest costs to digital art.
To sum it all up, a couple pages back I made an analogy for this situation that still sums up my feelings on the matter: