Dylan Hafertepen / Dylan Häs / noodlesandbeef / ekigyuu / beefdumplings / California Cow / dylanhasdesign - Gay BDSM Muscle-Bear with Ball Inflation Fetish Linked to 3 Deaths

Up until a couple of minutes ago this popped up when you googled "noodles and beef silicone injection", all the posts link back to his new "articles". It doesn't now, I don't know what that means.
It's insidious, and it tells two things very clearly, 1) he really does not give a shit about the life that was lost and 2) he has reasons big enough to try to hide everything as quickly as possible, and it's not just the social cost. If it was just that he would've left the "memorial" post up.

Edit: thank you queerape, changed the link
 
Last edited:
Up until a couple of minutes ago this popped up when you googled "noodles and beef silicone injection", all the posts link back to his new "articles". It doesn't now, I don't know what that means.
It's insidious, and it tells two things very clearly, 1) he really does not give a shit about the life that was lost and 2) he has reasons big enough to try to hide everything as quickly as possible, and it's not just the social cost. If it was just that he would've left the "memorial" post up.
Everyone, only use donotlink.it to save and access his new articles. That will keep them low in the SEO. Give lots of clicks to this thread and the shit he’s trying to cover up so it stays on top.
 
There is now an article about comparing silicone injectors for cooking. I'm now confident that Dylan Hafertapen a.k.a. Noodles and Beef or noodlesandbeef is trying to conceal that he caused the deaths of 3 people and blatantly abused tens of people for a cunty ostentatious flamboyant charade by attempting to change what appears when his name or alias is searched. He wants 'dylan hafertapen' and 'silicone' search to bring a cooking recipe. Chuck Osborn and Daniel Balderas or Hafertepen and other dogs are suspiciously silent on this - and if they are supporting this behavior they deserve the same public backlash.

If you're worried about this narcissistic psychopath causing more harm on other people, share this thread with people you know or on social media. That's how I got well versed on this after seeing it shared on Facebook. This page and pages where his bulshit is exposed should be shared with everyone.
 
There is now an article about comparing silicone injectors for cooking. I'm now confident that Dylan Hafertapen a.k.a. Noodles and Beef or noodlesandbeef is trying to conceal that he caused the deaths of 3 people and blatantly abused tens of people for a cunty ostentatious flamboyant charade by attempting to change what appears when his name or alias is searched.

He's doing the same thing with his Instagram. He's trying to make it look like the "noodlesandbeef" brand never even existed, that it was always about cooking. If the rumors about him moving cities again are true, it's likely that him and his pups will be looking for new jobs very soon, and from his usual MO, it's possible he's setting the stage to use "just a happy gay guy with an interest in international cuisine, being unfairly attacked by racists and homophobes" when new people they meet will inevitably ask. And he's doing all of this while everyone has their eyes on him, how fucked up do you have to be? That's some supervillain level shit. Google autocompletes "Noodles and Beef" with "Noodles and Beef controversy", but that doesn't link back to anything actually useful, so here's a full thread of some Noodles and Beef controversy for anyone curious.
 
Two things I want to know about Dylan Hafertepen (aka noodlesandbeef), from people who have actually met him:

1) Is he a manlet (he looks like one in the various pictures)
2) Is Hafertepen actually the surname he was born with, or is it something he made up? I have noticed all the "pups" in Dylan Hafertepen's harem use that last name also.

I also want to know how Dylan Hafertepen had the authority to get Jack cremated. Isn't that reserved for next of kin, which I assume would be his mother? Is that something that can be assigned in a will? It seems weird to me. But in any case, regardless of the legal status involved, I find it repugnant that Dylan Hafertepen, aka noodlesandbeef, had him cremated and sent Jack Chapman's (aka Tank Hafertepen or Tank Heathcliff) ashes to his mother in an urn as if he was doing her a big fucking favor.
 
Dylan has a whole new wordpress on his site over at macaroniandtuna.com :)

http://noodlesandbeef.com/singapore-noodles-and-beef/ (archive)

He's now a food blogger? :) LOLs
And this is a cover-up in case people go over to his website?

Can we presume that now he has pulled down his 'heartfelt' (*cough*) grief-stricken (*cough*) post about Jack/Tank, that he's now completely over it!‽‽‽?
I wish I could have a dead, disposable boyfriend/pup/slave/set of ashes in an urn!
The blog is the most blatant cover-up I’ve ever seen. At the time of writing this, it consists of three different recipes for noodles and beef (including one posted today about celebrating Chinese New Year) and a piece about silicone turkey masters. Pretty sure he’s swiping the articles from other sites.
 
I'm glad there's an article that's actually talking about Dylan's involvement and not acting as if he's his poor partner dealing with the grief of one of his boyfriends dying.

What I'm saying is I just don't buy what he's selling at all. It's all just stage-managed and posed photos. All of his energy goes into creating the appearance of this scene/life - and that's the important thing. All we have to go on is the photos as documentary evidence - it's common knowledge that he photoshops everything. He does not act like a dominant at all - in the way he conducts himself or the videos I've seen of him. It's a fantasy that he puts out on social media.

This one is five years old, sure - but nothing about the way they interact suggests a dom/sub relationship...
https://vimeo.com/62221328

Just my take on it really.
I thought about that but didn't give it much thought. The way Jack talked about Dylan being manipulative and wanting to leave but wasn't able to makes me believe that Dylan had been doing at least some of these things, or else had other ways to control them.
 
Two things I want to know about Dylan Hafertepen (aka noodlesandbeef), from people who have actually met him:

1) Is he a manlet (he looks like one in the various pictures)
2) Is Hafertepen actually the surname he was born with, or is it something he made up? I have noticed all the "pups" in Dylan Hafertepen's harem use that last name also.

I also want to know how Dylan Hafertepen had the authority to get Jack cremated. Isn't that reserved for next of kin, which I assume would be his mother? Is that something that can be assigned in a will? It seems weird to me. But in any case, regardless of the legal status involved, I find it repugnant that Dylan Hafertepen, aka noodlesandbeef, had him cremated and sent Jack Chapman's (aka Tank Hafertepen or Tank Heathcliff) ashes to his mother in an urn as if he was doing her a big fucking favor.

Maybe Dylan had power of attorney. That wouldn't surprise me.
 
The blog is the most blatant cover-up I’ve ever seen. At the time of writing this, it consists of three different recipes for noodles and beef (including one posted today about celebrating Chinese New Year) and a piece about silicone turkey masters. Pretty sure he’s swiping the articles from other sites.
https://www.cooksillustrated.com/recipes/7977-singapore-noodles-for-two
https://www.sears.com/bestutensils-...erId=Freshware&prdNo=5&blockNo=5&blockType=G5
https://www.taste.com.au/recipes/longevity-beef-noodles/c484775c-e47b-4700-bf0c-4122c10893d9

You're Welcome
 
Last edited:
1) Is he a manlet (he looks like one in the various pictures)

Yes, in person he is quite short. Everything about their online presence is curated and photoshopped to make him look bigger, taller, and more substantial than he really is. Most of the posts are fake. I have seen them go to an event, order food, and take two bites while they take photos. Then they promptly throw the food away and leave. Sure enough, it shows up in their newsletter a few weeks later about the amazing time they had. Gag me with a spoon.


Thought I would add this video:
https://vimeo.com/169905001

Backup:
https://mega.nz/#!EF9AzC7B!E4md54DlcClHTIz0JTtTCAY4kUEUI39c5Xz9sjA7pr0

This parody is quite funny:

https://vimeo.com/170244567
 
Earlier in the thread it looked like the police were opening up an investigation. Think that was legit or just blowing smoke up the asses of people blowing up their Twitter?
 
Earlier in the thread it looked like the police were opening up an investigation. Think that was legit or just blowing smoke up the asses of people blowing up their Twitter?

Untitled.jpg


If this is his actual mother commenting under the aaizos article, sounds like it's for real.
 
I know this has become a pity-party and all, but I honestly don't really feel that bad for this Jack dude. He should have known his life was over the minute he handed it over to a brown manlet with a Napoleon complex.
I'll take my Dumbs and Autistics like a man but I sort of agree. I do think he was a victim in this scenario but I don't think the dynamics of abuser and victim, much like the BDSM dynamics at play here, are completely black and white. Jack had a hand in what befell him: he clearly had a bad past and was vulnerable, but a sane man of 28 makes his own decisions; we all live with our traumas and he chose to engage in the sinister decadence of this manlet cabal.

He was living in Melbourne which is about on par with SF in terms of social justice decadence, it's not like he was rescued from a Christian commune in western Queensland (these exist FYI). His emotional dysfunction was an element in his choice to become an indentured slave, but what I'm getting down to here is sex. This entire thing was (still is) a fetish-driven operation. Jack voluntarily gave up his whole life for sexual gratification - it's the exact plot of Antony and Cleopatra; a parable of male desire that Jack apparently slept through in English class. I am not saying fetishism is evil; just like porn it will exist whether society accepts it or not. It's simply a product of human psyche. What I'm saying is that although this is certainly a tragedy of a deranged Pinoy gorilla acquiring a toy and breaking it, Jack isn't excused from all culpability in his fate. Don't follow your dick wherever it points.
 
I'll take my Dumbs and Autistics like a man but I sort of agree. I do think he was a victim in this scenario but I don't think the dynamics of abuser and victim, much like the BDSM dynamics at play here, are completely black and white. Jack had a hand in what befell him: he clearly had a bad past and was vulnerable, but a sane man of 28 makes his own decisions; we all live with our traumas and he chose to engage in the sinister decadence of this manlet cabal.

He was living in Melbourne which is about on par with SF in terms of social justice decadence, it's not like he was rescued from a Christian commune in western Queensland (these exist FYI). His emotional dysfunction was an element in his choice to become an indentured slave, but what I'm getting down to here is sex. This entire thing was (still is) a fetish-driven operation. Jack voluntarily gave up his whole life for sexual gratification - it's the exact plot of Antony and Cleopatra; a parable of male desire that Jack apparently slept through in English class. I am not saying fetishism is evil; just like porn it will exist whether society accepts it or not. It's simply a product of human psyche. What I'm saying is that although this is certainly a tragedy of a deranged Pinoy gorilla acquiring a toy and breaking it, Jack isn't excused from all culpability in his fate. Don't follow your dick wherever it points.
Pretty much, man. At the end of the day, he indoctrinated himself into what amounts to a gay cult, and then died over the desire to get the cummies out of his pee pee. The cops don't give a fuck apparently and I'm sure half the people reading this story are jerking off to it, virtually nobody really cares, that's life.
 
I'll take my Dumbs and Autistics like a man but I sort of agree. I do think he was a victim in this scenario but I don't think the dynamics of abuser and victim, much like the BDSM dynamics at play here, are completely black and white. Jack had a hand in what befell him: he clearly had a bad past and was vulnerable, but a sane man of 28 makes his own decisions; we all live with our traumas and he chose to engage in the sinister decadence of this manlet cabal.

He was living in Melbourne which is about on par with SF in terms of social justice decadence, it's not like he was rescued from a Christian commune in western Queensland (these exist FYI). His emotional dysfunction was an element in his choice to become an indentured slave, but what I'm getting down to here is sex. This entire thing was (still is) a fetish-driven operation. Jack voluntarily gave up his whole life for sexual gratification - it's the exact plot of Antony and Cleopatra; a parable of male desire that Jack apparently slept through in English class. I am not saying fetishism is evil; just like porn it will exist whether society accepts it or not. It's simply a product of human psyche. What I'm saying is that although this is certainly a tragedy of a deranged Pinoy gorilla acquiring a toy and breaking it, Jack isn't excused from all culpability in his fate. Don't follow your dick wherever it points.

Yes, Jack had a hand in his own undoing... but he's dead, and prior to Jack another guy also died via silicone injections with Dylan as the common denominator. I don't know if it's a 50/50 culpability divide.
 
Yes, Jack had a hand in his own undoing... but he's dead, and prior to Jack another guy also died via silicone injections with Dylan as the common denominator. I don't know if it's a 50/50 culpability divide.
I did not mean to imply Jack was totally complicit in what happened to him. My argument was that he made decisions for himself that played a part in this sad, premature end. He had a brain in his head. I don't have a problem with civil disagreement, but I just can't view him as a helpless damsel; he was not stupid, insane, or, at the outset, helpless. He walked into a trap, yes, but he walked into it. I agree with the consensus that Dylan is an abuser.
 
Back