🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

[Gustav Schuchardt]

You know what will be funny...if it turns out that WSJ had nothing to do with this, a bunch of people jumped to conclusions, and ...smug chuckle...smug chuckle...Trump tweets #gamergate.

That's just crazy enough to be true.

 

[Sir Auroras]

Taken down twice in one night. Wow.

RIP in pepperoni. Damn, now I gotta put my chips and dip away.

Man, fuck youtube. Just fuck em.

 

[Fougaro]

How the fuck is this reporting by the way? Silencing your critics, getting involved in their business personally? Journalists are fucking parasites. Freedom of the press was a mistake.

I fully agree that journos can be scum, I learned that lesson in the 90s when I saw the nauseating and detestable creature known as Christiane Amanpour.

But the tinfoil tard in me believes this is less about Ralph and muh Nazis, but more about people like Ralph being perceived as potential competition with him "platforming hate" being a convenient excuse. You don't start a business in the town without kissing La Familia's ring.

 

[Secret Asshole]

This is due to the midterms and the WSJ article. The Dems and libtards are doing everything they can to get him banned.

 

[Kirito]

Google owns that site, it's their property they can do what they want with it.

You can fuck yourself with your lolbertarian nonsense. They have an effective monopoly and collude with other companies with the same status to shut people down for having opinions.
Should google be able to pay their employees 5 dollars an hour and refuse to provide healthcare? It's a private company, right?

 

[Sheryl Nome]

You can fuck yourself with your lolbertarian nonsense. They have an effective monopoly and collude with other companies with the same status to shut people down for having opinions.
Should google be able to pay their employees 5 dollars an hour and refuse to provide healthcare? It's a private company, right?

Don't worry, we just have to build our own internet, our own financial system because the banks will fuck us for ideological reasons, and also our own fucking entire society because you know, the grocery store and restaurants do business with who they want, and the fact that all of them are just collectively refusing to sell to you definitely isn't collusion, sorry you're starving but they get to choose who they do business with

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Also, all jokes aside, Trump should tell Youtube et al that they can either have no editorial control, be content independent platforms and get Communications Decency Act Section 230 protections, or be publishers with editorial control and no CDA S 230 protection.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

This shit really sucks, but I disavow anyone who goes full Couch Cuck mode because of it. However Youtubers don't seem like a very stable bunch to me so maybe Youtube should handle it's PR in a better way.

View attachment 582270

Also, all jokes aside, Trump should tell Youtube et al that they can either have no editorial control, be content independent platforms and get Communications Decency Act Section 230 protections, or be publishers with editorial control and no CDA S 230 protection.

Trump can try, but the courts don't give a shit, S230 basically gives them all plausible deniability because they hide behind Terms of Service violations

 

[Kirito]

Trump can try, but the courts don't give a shit, S230 basically gives them all plausible deniability because they hide behind Terms of Service violations

Which is why they should be stripped of those protections since they have constantly proven they're not providing a content independent platform

 

[JustStopDude]

This is due to the midterms and the WSJ article. The Dems and libtards are doing everything they can to get him banned.

I think the vast majority of people have no idea who Ethan Ralph is. I suspect it is far more likely to be more mundane reason for this...

 

[AnOminous]

I like the lol.

Because Ralph now knows that he's gone instantly from a super autistic spergy clown a sliver from just being a flat out lolcow to a free speech hero instantly.

And let's face it, that Koh cunt has a future of shit to look forward to.

 

[Ma_Hooty]

Trying not to sound a-loggy, but I'm fucking pissed off.

I really enjoyed The Killstream, it became a nightly ritual for me as my work would end before they started and it really helped me unwind after a stressful work day with just laughing at stupid news and equally stupid people - hell, I even gave a few superberries just so Ralph would say stupid stuff ("I'm your host, Ethan Ralph, owner and Editor-in-Chief of theRalphRetort.com and my favorite anime is Bible Black").

Then, less than a week before midterms, out comes the hammer - "Stop sharing our societal fuck-ups to thousands of others whom we get a cut of their donations or you'll be depersoned!"

We can't laugh or have fun at the expense of others, even if it's justified - hell, we can't have fun at all because that sort of thing is booweeing and you're hurting my feewings uwu.

Fuck your feelings.

These snake-skinned faggots have never been at the foot-end of a beating or publically humiliated by dozens of your peers that you'll see for the next several years.

They think they accomplished something? Lol, they sure did:

Streisand Effect inbound.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

I think the vast majority of people have no idea who Ethan Ralph is. I suspect it is far more likely to be more mundane reason for this...

People don't get struck down twice in minutes.
Google knows who ethan ralph is. WSJ contacted Google about the killstream.

The killstream will -never- come back to youtube. That era is over.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

Trump can try, but the courts don't give a shit, S230 basically gives them all plausible deniability because they hide behind Terms of Service violations

It's not impossible to prove that a platform has an ideological bias. James O'Keefe has been doing it for ages. Add in a statement of policy from a Trump appointee at the relevant executive agency (FCC?) and/or maybe an executive order and you've got a situation that will at least make Youtube/Twitter/Facebook/Google etc think twice about the course of action they're pursuing of nuking all non far left content.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

It's not impossible to prove that a platform has an ideological bias. James O'Keefe has been doing it for ages. Add in a statement of policy from a Trump appointee at the relevant executive agency (FCC?) and maybe an executive order and you've got a situation that will at least make Youtube/Twitter/Facebook/Google etc think twice about the course of action they're pursuing of nuking all non far left content.

It doesn't matter. The courts have literally given these companies blanket immunity. You can't executive order away laws written by congress, nor can you executive order away rulings by the supreme court.

Good. Fucking. Luck.

 

[Kirito]

It doesn't matter. The courts have literally given these companies blanket immunity. You can't executive order away laws written by congress, nor can you executive order away rulings by the supreme court.

Good. Fucking. Luck.

He could break up the monopolies and have these companies split up.

 

[AJ 447]

LOL at least they have something new to cry over other than Metokur's dox

 

[ComeoutandJULAY]

Apparently the WSJ gave some positive press to BetterHelp a few years ago:

 

[Sheryl Nome]

He could break up the monopolies and have these companies split up.

would require the DoJ to launch a successful anti-trust lawsuit ordering things like divestment, unlikely but possible, you would likely have to prove some sort of collusion.

This is difficult, you would have to have an email or something, and even then i doubt our cucked government would order these firms to break up.

We need new laws, you can't get around section 230, but you can clarify and override it.

 

[AJ 447]

Apparently the WSJ wrote some positive press for BetterHelp:

Completely banal piece written by a freelance journalist over 4 years ago? GOT 'EM