🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
O'Shagnasty said:
It's kind of funny watching the side that gutted obamacare pretend to care about sick kids.
Click to expand...
O'Shagnasty said:
People who throw fits over a buck or two a year in taxes going to sick kids aren't people who ever donate their own money to sick kids. Let's be real here Ralph's fake charity stunt was nothing more than virtue signalling in a political pissing match and I don't blame St. Judes one bit for choosing to refund the money. Image is important for charities and being part of an alt-right nazi dog and pony show isn't a good look.
Click to expand...
Sonork said:
Well if you want to be real the data shows that conservatives give more money to charity than liberals but if we're being real i'll let you have the best interpretation of the data for your argument which is that conservatives are more wealthy, give more to charity, although the charities they give to tend to be religious institutions whereas liberals tend to give money to secular organisations and if you adjust for church attendance and income liberals are no less generous than conservatives.

So there you go, lets be real... you don't really care and will come up with any number of reasons to justify taking money away from kids with cancer because it was raised by someone you don't like.
Click to expand...
Data also shows conservatives give more a portion of their income to charity. You may want to look into that kind of stuff if you aren't just laying bait.

Null said:
Zidan is reporting they completely obliterated the associated Google account, including hi Gmail and Google Drive and all associated files.
Click to expand...
This is the truly terrifying part. Ok your eceleb channel gets shut down, whatever. Now all the sudden the tools you use in your real job are gone too. Basically don't trust google with your backup.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RichardMongler, Super Collie, ChromaQuack and 19 others
Ralph supposedly appearing here in 15 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=secj-F194H8

1vb6b7n.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Reactions: NOT Sword Fighter Super, AnotherPleb, Nigero and 2 others
O'Shagnasty said:
People who throw fits over a buck or two a year in taxes going to sick kids aren't people who ever donate their own money to sick kids. Let's be real here Ralph's fake charity stunt was nothing more than virtue signalling in a political pissing match and I don't blame St. Judes one bit for choosing to refund the money. Image is important for charities and being part of an alt-right nazi dog and pony show isn't a good look.
Click to expand...

I'd have to agree. 27 K is merely chump change for a hospital. At best, it's about half the yearly salary of a NURSE. And let's be honest, if Ralph ever appears on a talk show to talk about this shit, all I'd have to do as a cohost is merely ask "Hey why is most of your chat demanding you sing Moonman for like 2 hours?".

WSJ are cunts, but 27 K, for a hospital, while useful, their name and reputation as a charity is way more important.
 
  • Disagree
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ChromaQuack, Long time lurker, NOT Sword Fighter Super and 9 others
Cinderblock said:
I'd have to agree. 27 K is merely chump change for a hospital. At best, it's about half the yearly salary of a NURSE. And let's be honest, if Ralph ever appears on a talk show to talk about this shit, all I'd have to do as a cohost is merely ask "Hey why is most of your chat demanding you sing Moonman for like 2 hours?".

WSJ are cunts, but 27 K, for a hospital, while useful, their name and reputation as a charity is way more important.
Click to expand...
Maybe. But banning and removing a YouTuber from all Google products is NOT the way to handle this mess. Alex Jones is right shockingly enough.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Super Collie, Long time lurker, NOT Sword Fighter Super and 19 others
Cinderblock said:
their name and reputation as a charity is way more important.
Click to expand...
Do you retards even think about what you're saying? What sort of dumb cunt is going to try and tarnish the reputation of a charity that treats kids with cancer because they took money from a fucking nazi?

And who would even care if they did? What sort of person is going to say, hey yeah, well about those kids, i know they're dying but, that money is dirty, give it back or you're a bad person.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: RichardMongler, Super Collie, ChromaQuack and 21 others
Cinderblock said:
I'd have to agree. 27 K is merely chump change for a hospital. At best, it's about half the yearly salary of a NURSE. And let's be honest, if Ralph ever appears on a talk show to talk about this shit, all I'd have to do as a cohost is merely ask "Hey why is most of your chat demanding you sing Moonman for like 2 hours?".

WSJ are cunts, but 27 K, for a hospital, while useful, their name and reputation as a charity is way more important.
Click to expand...
That's all true, but is missing the broader point. A charity should be able to say "Hey we don't like them and think they're gross, but jokes on them because we are gonna use their money for good." without getting any backlash.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: RichardMongler, Long time lurker, Shroom King and 21 others
Cinderblock said:
I'd have to agree. 27 K is merely chump change for a hospital. At best, it's about half the yearly salary of a NURSE. And let's be honest, if Ralph ever appears on a talk show to talk about this shit, all I'd have to do as a cohost is merely ask "Hey why is most of your chat demanding you sing Moonman for like 2 hours?".

WSJ are cunts, but 27 K, for a hospital, while useful, their name and reputation as a charity is way more important.
Click to expand...

So, they had to deny contributions based on political motivations, basically alienating 50% of their possible donors, for some SJW virtue signalling points?

Then YouTube refunded a stream's worth of Super Chats that they got no part of and you think that these things, along with the unpersoning, is all about keeping up appearances?

I'm gonna have to press X to doubt.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: NOT Sword Fighter Super, AnotherPleb, Audit_The_Autist and 8 others
Okay so the one thing I'm not clear on is, which institution actually issued the refund?

Based on the tweet chain it seemed like Keemstar had confirmed that it was Youtube, not St Jude that did the rejecting but I'm seeing a lot of claims it was St. Jude still floating around.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Long time lurker and Marvin
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back