🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
posqjg.png

Don't know if it was mentioned yet or not, but shitrat and the other skeptics are taking full advantage of this to try to get revenge lol.

They're next. They're fucking re.tarded if they think YouTube is going to let them stick around forever. They took out Ralph because he was really fucking popular. Also no, this wasn't a gay OP. The skeptics are nowhere that efficient. They're completely limp-dicked LARPing faggots.

If you believe 'LAUREN PLEASE RESPOND' had anything to do with this, you're a mental invalid.

Yeah, that's right. So if you truly care about your carrer in the youtube and media sphere, you'd distance yourself the hell away from toxic property like. Infowars. It's like Robert Bowen having an interview with Richard Spencer to clear his name.

Uh, you realize Ralph has had Richard Spencer on multiple times and treated him like a guest, right? And clear his name of what exactly? For having the wrong opinion? Do you even know what you are talking about?
 
Yeah, that's right. So if you truly care about your carrer in the youtube and media sphere, you'd distance yourself the hell away from toxic property like. Infowars. It's like Robert Bowen having an interview with Richard Spencer to clear his name.

"If you want to keep making money, keep your head down and shut the hell up. Also make sure to ostracize people that commit wrongthink".

Does that about cover it? Because regardless of what you might think of Alex Jones, he's been an outspoken advocate of the right to free speech for about as long as he's been around. The only thing he's ever done wrong is said shit that people don't like, with the crazies in his audience being the ones that have caused trouble for him.

just an aside from the spergs trying to say it doesn't matter and that image is more important than 27K, a reminder about PR.

the golden rule is "assume any action taken will be discovered by the general public. can I reasonably defend it?". Can anyone reasonably say that they could defend taking 27K from kids dying of cancer? no? sit the fuck down, shut the fuck up, and let the adults talk.

Not only this, but acting like twenty-seven thousand dollars is chump change, or trying to downplay it by comparing it to total operating costs, is either disingenuous or stupid depending on which side of Hanlon's Razor you fall on.
 
posqjg.png

Don't know if it was mentioned yet or not, but shitrat and the other skeptics are taking full advantage of this to try to get revenge lol.
ĀØ
Who cares about shitrat. He won't reach 30, dying of pussy cancer.
That other skeptic, the waiter with a bloated belly and ego and that annoying cadence has already played his hand, he's finished, he just don't know it yet. He'll die poor and toothless in some run down council house of black lung.
 
Out of all the people he chooses to be his host in this issue he chooses ALEX JONES. :story:

RIP Ralph.
I think it is safe to assume (and after last night Ralph probably realized) that if he announced ahead of time he was going to go on a youtube stream that'd probably result in a recreation of that "grim reaper going from door to door with a trail of blood" image, Alex Jones is pretty much the only platform he can plan to appear on without more takedown drama happening.
 
You expect Youtube commenters to have any sort of decency.

No, I don't. All of this is incredibly predictable. It's the like when cops shut down house parties because someone won't stop drinking on the porch. There's always some loser who fucks up the fun things for everyone else because they think they're above the rules or want to be le epic trole. People need to understand that even if you're not a kike hating SS officer, if you make the numbers "1488" show up on a stream often enough, people are going to believe that you are and even those that don't believe it are going to have an excuse to deplatform you.
 
No, I don't. All of this is incredibly predictable. It's the like when cops shut down house parties because someone won't stop drinking on the porch. There's always some loser who fucks up the fun things for everyone else because they think they're above the rules or want to be le epic trole. People need to understand that even if you're not a kike hating SS officer, if you make the numbers "1488" show up on a stream often enough, people are going to believe that you are and even those that don't believe it are going to have an excuse to deplatform you.

"People need to curtail their speech to be allowed to participate in any larger discourse".

That's the entire fucking point of the sweeping censorship that's been taking place lately, and to kowtow to it is to tacitly agree with it.
 
I think it is safe to assume (and after last night Ralph probably realized) that if he announced ahead of time he was going to go on a youtube stream that'd probably result in a recreation of that "grim reaper going from door to door with a trail of blood" image, Alex Jones is pretty much the only platform he can plan to appear on without more takedown drama happening.

Right now Ralph is persona non-grata. Apparently the WSJ is being inundated with the kill cancer meme and even their call lines have been flooded with people calling in. No way they'd let him stream on anything while they're in a state of constant humiliation. Alex Jones is basically one place he can go where he won't get shoah'd

No, I don't. All of this is incredibly predictable. It's the like when cops shut down house parties because someone won't stop drinking on the porch. There's always some loser who fucks up the fun things for everyone else because they think they're above the rules or want to be le epic trole. People need to understand that even if you're not a kike hating SS officer, if you make the numbers "1488" show up on a stream often enough, people are going to believe that you are and even those that don't believe it are going to have an excuse to deplatform you.

This doesn't matter. AT ALL. He's had talks with Richard Spencer and treated him like a human being. That's grounds enough for removal. It didn't matter if all the super-chats were, 'How's the weather today?' Ralph has had white nationalists, black nationalists, extremists, fuck he even was going to get David Duke on. You think 1488 superchats did him in? Come the fuck on. He had a late night show with 5k+ consistent, every night. He made a charity stream that raised 27k. Just having a person the left doesn't like on even if Ralph doesn't agree with him is grounds for being a Nazi by association.

Don't be dense. This wasn't done because of superchats. This was because Ralph was popular, basically surpassing every single left wing stream on the platform, gave a voice to controversial people, and had the power to make lots of money. You think YouTube was going to fucking allow this or someone in the legacy media wasn't going to notice and shut him down?

You have to remember, Silicon Valley and the media are TERRIFIED of people like Ralph. Alex Jones got deplatformed not for Sandy Hook, but because he was perceived as influential for getting Trump elected. Here we are, less than a week before the midterm, we've got this guy promising to do an election spectacular. You think, 'Oh, this is going to draw 9k people and mock dems all night, IN THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN AMERICAN HISTORY, lets just do nothing!' Call Ralph a faggot lolcow for all I care, he had power and they were afraid of it. End of story.

EDIT:
Also remember, The Young Turks is owned by YouTube as well. And they would have gotten BLOWN THE FUCK OUT by Ralph. That's a major embarrassment to YouTube. They do not want that happening. Its the same rational for Netflix removing ratings and Twitter removing the like button. They're trying to eliminate metrics to make people think their views are far more popular than they are.
 
Right now Ralph is persona non-grata. Apparently the WSJ is being inundated with the kill cancer meme and even their call lines have been flooded with people calling in. No way they'd let him stream on anything while they're in a state of constant humiliation. Alex Jones is basically one place he can go where he won't get shoah'd



This doesn't matter. AT ALL. He's had talks with Richard Spencer and treated him like a human being. That's grounds enough for removal. It didn't matter if all the super-chats were, 'How's the weather today?' Ralph has had white nationalists, black nationalists, extremists, fuck he even was going to get David Duke on. You think 1488 superchats did him in? Come the fuck on. He had a late night show with 5k+ consistent, every night. He made a charity stream that raised 27k. Just having a person the left doesn't like on even if Ralph doesn't agree with him is grounds for being a Nazi by association.

Don't be dense. This wasn't done because of superchats. This was because Ralph was popular, gave a voice to controversial people, and had the power to make lots of money.

I'm talking about the mechanism that is being used to delete his channel. Richard Spencer, alt-right viewpoints and even nazi viewpoints are not disallowed by Youtube - they obviously don't want that content on their website, but like nudity, it's all allowed in the proper context. What isn't allowed, explicitly, is (What they define as) hate speech in comment boxes and superchats. The fact that you can't turn on this stream (Or Metokur's) without seeing a nonstop stream of idiots playing Nazi Dress-Up in text serves to legitimize Youtube's deplatforming of Ralph in the eyes of whatever megacorp they is paying them the most ad revenue this week.
 
Last edited:
-Free speech banned:agree:
-Media tightly controlled by a select few:agree:
-Un-personed for wrong think:agree:
-pretense of benefiting the whole, yet really only helping a select few:agree:

Sounds like sounds pretty right wing to me.

edit: you guys know I'm talking about WSJ and how it is similar to what the communists did right?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back