Culture Garfield Fans Are Furious That His Instagram Seems to Discourage Voting - A fierce debate erupted in the comment section of the Garfield Instagram account when the cat seemed

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/...that-his-instagram-seems-to-discourage-voting
On the day of the midterm elections, a fierce debate erupted in the comment section of the official, verified Garfield Instagram account, managed by the official licensing firm Paws, Inc. The lazy cat seemed to express indifference about the election turnout, and perhaps by some liberal interpretations, the cat encouraged people not to vote. The post currently has 9,612 comments and counting.

“Wtf Garfield vote or die,” one user commented, receiving 42 likes.

“Garfield no be a functioning and contributing citizen of America,” another user comment, receiving 12 likes.

“Garfield do you want to abolish the 1st amendment?” a user commented, receiving 4 likes.

Why the outcry? The problem is that Garfield has been interpreted by some to be an ally of critics of capitalism. Hates Mondays? Is lazy? Proponent of the Marxist idea that people deserve free time to eat lasagna and cultivate intellectual thought and social connections outside of our system of labor? Sounds pretty antifa to me.

Hundreds of seemingly young people habitually respond to Garfield Instagram posts that refer to the weekend, or to hating Mondays, with great enthusiasm. On a recent post of Garfield peering through binoculars and declaring “Ah, there you are Weekend,” a user who identifies as a college freshman commented, “You are the only reason I have to live.”

In an email to Motherboard, Paws, Inc. representative Kim Campbell Beasley said that Garfield is canonically apolitical.

"He’s a cat. He can’t vote," she said. "That’s why most of his hashtags on that post are directed to pet owners, e.g. #cat #cats #catoftheday #catsagram #catstagram #catsofinstagram #pet #pets #petoftheday. Do pets care about politics? Garfield doesn’t think so."

Beasley also said that the comments did not represent a typical response from Garfield fans. "They know – or should know— Garfield is a very apathetic cat," she said. "He’s mostly interested in his own creature comforts. If anything, he was expressing his fatigue at all the political ads."


For a period between July 17 (World Emoji Day) and October 25 (World Pasta Day, a significant day for Garfield), the comment section in Garfield Instagram posts were temporarily disabled. In an email to Motherboard, Beasley said that certain devoted fans were making the comment section "out of hand, despite the profanity filters."

"We have recently enabled the comment section again, and hope that those who comment will remember there may be youngsters reading the comments," she said.

An image posted today seems to encourage users to “Chill Out”—perhaps a response to yesterday’s antics.

Though I am a fan and friend of Garfield, and while our democratic process is deeply flawed, I reluctantly have to disagree with the cartoon cat in this case. While there are many important ways to take political action—including unionizing and forms of direct action and demonstration—voting is undoubtedly an important part of the equation.

Here is the post in question:
vivaldi_2018-11-08_18-56-13.png
 
What makes me happiest about this is that Jim Davis is a cynical shady fuck who only created this goddamned orange abortion to be a marketing vehicle for toys and plastic crap. Any kind of controversy or emotion other than totally bland safe humor is the exact opposite of what the soulless corporation that runs Garfield wants.
A shady fuck that has apologized for creating garfield before and joked that Jon killed Larry and hid his body in the basement.

See, I want to be mad at Davis, but I just can't.
 
What makes me happiest about this is that Jim Davis is a cynical shady fuck who only created this goddamned orange abortion to be a marketing vehicle for toys and plastic crap. Any kind of controversy or emotion other than totally bland safe humor is the exact opposite of what the soulless corporation that runs Garfield wants.
This is why I can’t even get annoyed by it. It was never intended to be good, just universally okay. There’s no artistic high that it fell from. When it’s good, that’s a happy by-product.
 
Motherboard, a """tech""" website, just wrote a line in an article about how someone's Instagram comment got 4 likes.

This could be a clever commentary by Jim Davis on the overplayed usage of the fourth wall to get people to participate in politics but then Jim Davis thinks Garfield is a literal tulpa.
I've heard that he's dropped hints that he dilikes Garfield, but loves money.
 
Davis has always been upfront that Garfield only existed as a means to license and sell merchandise and make money that way, he didn't have any desire to draw cat comics any more than anything else, he wasn't in it for the art, and he'll tell you that to your face.

There's a reason he didn't even bat an eye at "Garfield Minus Garfield" because he knew any publicity was good pub.

So, if you're shocked he doesn't want to alienate potential customers by politicizing his brand and having Garfield pick a side in a contentious election, you haven't been paying attention, EVER.

(his original idea for the strip was insects, but he ultimately rejected that idea because ad people told him that even though the art and humor was good enough for syndication, bugs weren't "cuddly" enough so people wouldn't buy a branded bug plushy for the car window or mosquito desk calendar like the would for a Marmaduke or a Heathcliff)
 
Last edited:
A shady fuck that has apologized for creating garfield before and joked that Jon killed Larry and hid his body in the basement.

See, I want to be mad at Davis, but I just can't.
Source, please? I remember reading something by Davis that implied that he regretted the commercialization of Garfield, but I can't seem to remember where I read that.
 
pipe strip
lasagna cat
Drew Barrymore's brother
sexual partner survey
Jim Davis has no talent

wow M E M E S wow
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Trilby
From all I've ever seen of Jim Davis, he seems like a genuinely nice guy who realized what rare opportunity he fell in and just went with it for all it's worth. I still have a nostalgic soft spot for Garfield even though I realize it's not particularly good and if I'd tell Davis from all I've seen he'd smile and say that he's glad I enjoyed it anyways. If you ask me it's a lot healthier and humanistic stance than people who draw comics about stupid shit like superheroes, act like they are pure artistic perfection that changes the world and then proceed to get high by huffing their own farts.

Davis is like a craftsman who has really mastered his craft. He'll give you a pleasant Garfield strip within specification and on time reliably, like clockwork. The world needs such people, too.

People expecting a meaningful statement from an orange cartoon cat and absolutely *FREAKING OUT( when they don't get it reflects more on the people than on anyone involved with creating Garfield tbh. These PSAs they watched as teens about how you should go vote were not meant to be mindlessly repeated like some authoritarian mantra without sense or introspection, especially not at twitter accounts of fictional cartoon cats. There were and are countries in the world where exactly not-voting was a dangerous political statement to make which could carry serious repercussions. This is a lot of words to say that these people are absolutely re.tarded and don't understand the world they're living in. Keep running in mindless mobs on Twitter I guess.
 
I should clarify that in my post i meant say is caring about Garfield qualityin 2018 is pretty dumb after they actually released that comics that really looks like they pander to fat fetishists and no that's not a joke at all
 
Source, please? I remember reading something by Davis that implied that he regretted the commercialization of Garfield, but I can't seem to remember where I read that.
I'm having trouble finding it as well. All I can find is about him apologizing for an ill timed strip that appeared on Veteran's Day.
 
"He’s a cat. He can’t vote,"
Beasley also said that the comments did not represent a typical response from Garfield fans. "They know – or should know— Garfield is a very apathetic cat," she said. "He’s mostly interested in his own creature comforts. If anything, he was expressing his fatigue
Let's all just take a moment to respect the best, funniest and most effective response to one of these anticontroversies of all time.
This marketting representative just said "cats can't vote, you maniacs" and then roasted millenials for not being true Garfield fans and feigning how much they care.
Then the page, on return of comments, told everyone to "chill out" and went on its business. Legendary.

Imagine how much easier things would be if comic book and videogame representatives did the same thing. Garfieldgate BTFO.
 
Back