Il_Duke
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2018
Doing math here since Phil is over sharing again. He has said his credit card payments are over 1000 a month. A normal minimum payment would be 2% of the balances. At 2% and 1000 per month that puts his credit card debt at 50k. Now he did say his payments recently doubled, so let's say it's 4% now, that would be 25k of credit card debt. 25k is the likely minimum amount of cc debt he has. Since he said he pays over 1000 per month let's say it was 1500 per month, now total debt is 37,500.
At the lowest his cc debt is 25k, I suspect it's more because Phil is often bad with numbers and being accurate. He is probably paying quite a bit more than 1000 per month and his payments probably did not double. So my best guess is 1500 per month at 3% of the balance, gives a total balance of 50k. This is a very easy amount of credit for someone to get and sometime during the last tax saga he mentioned having his credit maxed out, so I believe 50k is very possible.
Also his minimum payments going up have nothing to do with interest rates. It's the credit card companies seeing him as more risky now.
Solid math. I could swear his minimum payments going up had something to do with an usury law that was passed in Washington, but it's hard to find the specifics since they passed a restrictive Gun Control ballot measure last week, that's dominating the news cycle. He could also just have passed some debt threshold.
Let's assume August 2015 as the first time he had to dip into his credit line - when he was first suspended from Twitch and (allegedly) had his CPM cut from Machinima. A 25k credit card debt assumes he put an average of $550 a month on plastic from that month forward. It seems high, but I wouldn't be surprised by it, and it's actually not that unreasonable if you assume he's taken other hits that forced him to throw more on credit since then (other copyright strikes, leaving Machinima, his Curse haircuts, etc.) it's totally reasonable. Might even drag him into the 40-50k window if he did absolutely nothing to cut back on expenses, which is believable when you assume how much of his expenses are 'hard' (2 mortgages, CC debt, utilities in 2 states, business / self-employed federal taxes) vs. 'soft' (honestly it doesn't seem like he's cutting down on these, either).