Zoosadist Joshua Hoffman / Kero the Wolf / Radiance / Hakan Yote / BestYotie / KeroYamimora / Yami the Wolf

EurocopterTigre said:
18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3129 Sexual intercourse with animal. A person who engages in any form of sexual intercourse with an animal commits a misdemeanor of the second degree.
The relevant section on distribution of zoo porn.
Unfortunately while tracking that down I found that there is a PA law firm that apparently has a section that handles bestiality cases.(:_(
Click to expand...
There is a law firm... Specifically... for bestiality cases...
Karkov here I come, fuck the world. I'ma give my dog a box a slim jims from the gas station and get more ammo for my shotgun ;w;
 
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: Red Shirt Number 74, White bubblegum, catdog and 18 others
EurocopterTigre said:
18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3129 Sexual intercourse with animal. A person who engages in any form of sexual intercourse with an animal commits a misdemeanor of the second degree.
The relevant section on distribution of zoo porn.
Unfortunately while tracking that down I found that there is a PA law firm that apparently has a section that handles bestiality cases.(:_(
Click to expand...
Since people keep forgetting this, everything involving Koda happened in NY. PA has no jurisdiction over anything but the distribution.

You guys need to stop being lazy and actually read through the thread.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: White bubblegum, catdog, sergeantshinypony29 and 15 others
I saw this shared somewhere and I had to share it here. This sums up Kero...
upload_2018-11-17_12-50-55.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-17_12-50-3.png
    upload_2018-11-17_12-50-3.png
    367.7 KB · Views: 118
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
Reactions: catdog, Kebaberhelp, J A N D E K and 15 others
Sintharia said:
Since people keep forgetting this, everything involving Koda happened in NY. PA has no jurisdiction over anything but the distribution.

You guys need to stop being lazy and actually read through the thread.
Click to expand...
It's been like two months, this shit is spread across several threads, and I believe it has been reported in the thread that people reached out to the police where Kero lives in PA, and that they were investigating, so I think the oversight is forgivable. Here's the relevant New York law:
McKinney's Penal Law § 130.20: A person is guilty of sexual misconduct when he or she engages in sexual conduct with an animal or a dead human body. (Class A misdemeanor) Also if convicted individuals become registered sex offenders.
Although not relevant, since the distribution took place in PA, distribution is legal in New York. Also, there are an alarming amount of yahoo answers questions asking if viewing zoo porn is legal.

Edited for clarity
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: catdog, Vyxenn, Poiseon and 3 others
EurocopterTigre said:
Distribution is legal. Also, there are an alarming amount of yahoo answers questions asking if viewing zoo porn is legal.
Click to expand...

Distribution of obscene materials is UNLAWFUL on the federal level.
http://cbldf.org/2013/10/faq-graphic-sex-comics-controversial-content-and-crossing-the-border/

I'd recommend also checking out the case files:
http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/obscenity-case-files/

Take a look at Florida v. Mike Diana regarding drawn obscene materials. This is where even drawn art can get people convicted and thrown in jail.
 
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: catdog, Army Burger, Vyxenn and 3 others
Better Call Saul said:
Distribution of obscene materials is UNLAWFUL on the federal level.
http://cbldf.org/2013/10/faq-graphic-sex-comics-controversial-content-and-crossing-the-border/

I'd recommend also checking out the case files:
http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/obscenity-case-files/

Take a look at Florida v. Mike Diana regarding drawn obscene materials. This is where even drawn art can get people convicted and thrown in jail.
Click to expand...
The only relevant federal law I'm aware of directly relating to bestiality is 18 U.S. Code §2256 which deals with interstate distribution of CP involving animals. Bestiality laws are, and historically have been, set at the state level, hence the wide patchwork of different punishments, or lack thereof, for engaging in these behaviors in each state. Moreover, the case law you cited isn't really on point, nobody is discussing if Kero's dogfucking constitutes obscenity or if it protected speech. The question is merely if he, beyond a reasonable doubt, violated New York state law relating to bestiality or Pennsylvania's zoo porn distribution laws, and if those violations of the law were within the statute of limitations.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: catdog, Army Burger, Poiseon and 2 others
EurocopterTigre said:
The only on relevant federal law I'm aware of directly relating to bestiality is 18 U.S. Code §2256 which deals with interstate distribution of CP involving animals. Bestiality laws are, and historically have been, set at the state level, hence the wide patchwork of different punishments, or lack thereof, for engaging in these behaviors in each state. Moreover, the case law you cited isn't really on point, nobody is discussing if Kero's dogfucking constitutes obscenity or if it protected speech. The question is merely if he, beyond a reasonable doubt, violated New York state law relating to bestiality, and if that violation of the law was within the statute of limitations.
Click to expand...

Cases don't need to be relate to an issue directly to be applicable. Take a gander at BROCKETT v. SPOKANE ARCADES, INC. to see what constitutes obscenity which also references the Miller test. The court allowed states to define what constitutes obscenity.

Kero will most likely be charged under '§ 5903. Obscene and other sexual materials and performances', which is the most likely outcome. If they find other material on his computer like child porn then they'll add additional charges.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Informative
Reactions: White bubblegum, catdog, Marvin and 5 others
Better Call Saul said:
Cases don't need to be relate to an issue directly to be applicable. Take a gander at BROCKETT v. SPOKANE ARCADES, INC. to see what constitutes obscenity which also references the Miller test. The court allowed states to define what constitutes obscenity.

Kero will most likely be charged under '§ 5903. Obscene and other sexual materials and performances', which is the most likely outcome. If they find other material on his computer like child porn then they'll add additional charges.
Click to expand...
I already pointed out that the distribution itself was illegal in PA under Title 18§ 5903 of Pennsylvania law though. Again that in and of itself was never in question, as §5903 explicitly mentions bestiality as content that qualifies as obscene for the purposes of the law.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: catdog, Better Call Saul and NoFeline
DireCorby said:
when they say distributing obscene content is illegal, what qualifies as obscene? Pictures of bodies, or just sex shit? Videos of decapitations?
Click to expand...
Relevant to the thread: Per §5903 (Obscene) "Sexual conduct." Patently offensive representations or descriptions of ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, including sexual intercourse, anal or oral sodomy and sexual bestiality; and patently offensive representations or descriptions of masturbation, excretory functions, sadomasochistic abuse and lewd exhibition of the genitals.

:offtopic:If you want more general answers read the law itself.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, White bubblegum, catdog and 5 others
Better Call Saul said:
Distribution of obscene materials is UNLAWFUL on the federal level.
http://cbldf.org/2013/10/faq-graphic-sex-comics-controversial-content-and-crossing-the-border/

I'd recommend also checking out the case files:
http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/obscenity-case-files/

Take a look at Florida v. Mike Diana regarding drawn obscene materials. This is where even drawn art can get people convicted and thrown in jail.
Click to expand...
Federal obscenity laws, in practice, have been mostly restricted to actual CP with real children judicially.

Some people bring up the occasional lolicon case as a counterpoint, but that's usually an example of people who didn't have the money nor the will to fight it.

If someone in the US got charged with obscenity for lolicon, it's almost certain they could get off if they had a decent defense. Obscenity laws have been pretty much defanged.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Orkeosaurus and Kamov Ka-52
Plissken said:
So, what are the odds this guy will be arrested after the police are done with Snakething? Kero was pretty heavily involved with him, and since Kero can't keep his mouth shut... Yeah, the police would likely have plenty to go on.
Click to expand...
They don't need Snakething to roll on Kero to get him, although if they traded CP Kero is really fucked. Pennsylvania has him dead to rights on the distribution charge if literally nothing else.
 
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: catdog, NoFeline, Danger Mouse and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back