Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Democrats definitely seem to have some weird blind spot where they are completely incapable of grasping the concept that expanded government power is ever capable of biting them on the ass. I guess it's true that cocaine damages the part of your brain that lets you learn from mistakes.
I have more than once humorously jabbed at liberals, 'Time for you to embrace the idea of limited government!'.

How does the old saying go? Pass any law you like, but it gets enforced by your worst enemy.
 
Democrats definitely seem to have some weird blind spot where they are completely incapable of grasping the concept that expanded government power is ever capable of biting them on the ass. I guess it's true that cocaine damages the part of your brain that lets you learn from mistakes.
They’re well aware of it. That’s why you hear them say shit like “I think we should get rid of Republicans. We only need Democrats and Progressives anyway.”

Needless to say should the republicans ever disappear, the new quote will be “We should get rid of the democrats. We only need progressives and marxists.”
 
45a4ec6bb12cc1931c89e69f41275ee3.png

See, you think that sounds fun, but I can guarantee you that if you put the shoe on the other foot, you'd not be too pleased with the title "President-for-Life Donald J. Trump."

For the record, Obama wasn't qualified to begin with, even disregarding the two terms he already served. For the record, if that constitutional amendment shouldn't exist, it wouldn't have been ratified. The constitution isn't a stone tablet handed down from on high from mysterious forces, the same rules that allowed them to create this amendment allow it to be removed, if a majority thought it was a good idea (Luckily, they don't).

Look guys, it's nice you want a black dictator, maybe it makes your white guilt feel better or something, but there are plenty of those available around the world, go to one of those countries, don't ruin this one.
 
For the record, Obama wasn't qualified to begin with, even disregarding the two terms he already served. For the record, if that constitutional amendment shouldn't exist, it wouldn't have been ratified. The constitution isn't a stone tablet handed down from on high from mysterious forces, the same rules that allowed them to create this amendment allow it to be removed, if a majority thought it was a good idea (Luckily, they don't).

Look guys, it's nice you want a black dictator, maybe it makes your white guilt feel better or something, but there are plenty of those available around the world, go to one of those countries, don't ruin this one.
But those countries have dirty people, and no soy lattes.
 
45a4ec6bb12cc1931c89e69f41275ee3.png

See, you think that sounds fun, but I can guarantee you that if you put the shoe on the other foot, you'd not be too pleased with the title "President-for-Life Donald J. Trump."
I love how these cucks think that Obama would easily win a third term when in reality he would get owned by the voters.

I mean, people are tired of the Obamas in the same manner with the Bushes and Clintons. He sold himself out to the donors and lobbyists and pushed his agenda for them and not the country.

Plus, even if he won a third term and was president right now, his approval rating would plummet like Bush’s during the last two years of his presidency.
 
45a4ec6bb12cc1931c89e69f41275ee3.png

See, you think that sounds fun, but I can guarantee you that if you put the shoe on the other foot, you'd not be too pleased with the title "President-for-Life Donald J. Trump."

I was going to say "this guy should be mocked with this tweet for the rest of his life." But I think part of the problem is far lefties say shit like this all the time, and there's too much of it to throw it all back in their faces. And then there's the fact that they simply ignore their own mistakes and failures as if they either didn't happen or don't matter because of the strength of their feelings. ("That wasn't real communism.")
 
45a4ec6bb12cc1931c89e69f41275ee3.png

See, you think that sounds fun, but I can guarantee you that if you put the shoe on the other foot, you'd not be too pleased with the title "President-for-Life Donald J. Trump."

That "stupid constitutional amendment" exists because of a Democrat president, Ian. I wonder how many people know that, or which specific president and his four terms brought about the 22nd.

Also creepy porn lawyer finally got the hint over 2020:
cpl.JPG
 
Democrats definitely seem to have some weird blind spot where they are completely incapable of grasping the concept that expanded government power is ever capable of biting them on the ass. I guess it's true that cocaine damages the part of your brain that lets you learn from mistakes.
Five words. Supreme Court Nominee Nuclear Option.
Back in 2013 McConnell promised he would make the Dems regret it and he delivered on that promise.
Besides that how many powers did the Dems give to Obama that they are now freaking out about now that Orange Man has them?
Because I'm pretty sure that list is a mile long.
 
So I went to the barber shop today, while there the TV was on and then came a commercial that I think was either for some channel ad or literature thing. Anyway, among the lines in the commercial were "Would Harry Potter hate Trump? The answer is yes." To be frank I've gotten used to the TDS everywhere, but holy cow stop it with the Harry Potter references already. Its like its become a cult for liberal millennials.
 
Last edited:
So I went to the barber shop today, while there the TV was on and then came a commercial that I think was either for some channel ad or literature thing. Anyway, among the lines in the commercial were "Would Harry Potter hate Trump? The answer is yes." To be frank I've gotten used to the TDS everywhere, but holy cow stop it with the Harry Potter references already. Its like its become a cult for millennials.
If these people want to make a more solid point, they’d be better off referencing something non-fiction, like a history book. Of course, that’s asking for more thought and work being put in, so it’s highly unlikely this will happen anytime soon.
 
If these people want to make a more solid point, they’d be better off referencing something non-fiction, like a history book. Of course, that’s asking for more thought and work being put in, so it’s highly unlikely this will happen anytime soon.

The problem is that for a bunch of people whose catchphrase is that they're on the right side of history, actual history tends to disagree a lot.
 
Some of you guys might be scratching your heads at all the positive coverage of Bush H.W. when he was a-logged to holy hell and back in life.

That's because he redeemed himself in their eyes by dying and getting out of their way. The one good decision for anybody not like them.
 
Does Creepy Porn Lawyer™ have any political experience other than being a shitty lawyer?

I've honestly never heard.

To be fair, that's what all politicians are, shitty lawyers. Don't get me wrong, there's great money in being a congressman, but I wouldnt let any of them represent me in a jay walking case.
 
Back