- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
Cards against humanity is taking the TDS one step further. In addition to their other antics now there's this:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since the Supreme Court is 7-2 conservative, how likely would Obamacare gets removed?"wtf I hate the courts" "this is dangerous to our democracy" "reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
It's 5-4 and entirely on Kavanaugh.Since the Supreme Court is 7-2 conservative, how likely would Obamacare gets removed?
I like that the article points out a "key part" explicitly, but they'll still be outraged by the sucky one anyways.Man, can’t wait for the salt for this.
View attachment 615197
My apologies. I will say that Obama’s entire presidency will now be useless.It's 5-4 and entirely on Kavanaugh.
My apologies. I will say that Obama’s entire presidency will now be useless.
>implying James Buchanan and Herbert Hoover didn’t do thatUntrue, he did the one thing no other President could, he gave us a much better President.
There is no Pre-Trump history. There is Present-Trump and Post-Trump.>implying James Buchanan and Herbert Hoover didn’t do that
The war was always between orange man and black JesusThere is no Pre-Trump history. There is Present-Trump and Post-Trump.
Cards against humanity is taking the TDS one step further. In addition to their other antics now there's this:
View attachment 615187
Since the Supreme Court is 7-2 conservative, how likely would Obamacare gets removed?
It's only constitutional as a tax, somehow because if it's a tax it's okay to make people pay for shitty insurance, yet it's not a tax because Republicans keep saying it's a tax, but because the mandate is gone it's not actually constitutional.Didn't the courts find that it was constitutional only as a tax, which the Dems have consistently insisted that it's not?
It's only constitutional as a tax, somehow because if it's a tax it's okay to make people pay for shitty insurance, yet it's not a tax because Republicans keep saying it's a tax, but because the mandate is gone it's not actually constitutional.
Sounds like the courts were being massive pussies because it seemed unconstitutional from the beginning.
Man, it's almost as if it were a shitty bill in the first place, and trying to pass it against public approval was bound to backfire at some point.It came down to Chief Justice Roberts saying he found the bill constitutional based on the penalty associated with not having insurance, but I believe that penalty was an earmark or executive order, etc. Trump had the power to overturn the penalty, did so, and now the one thing that was specifically cited to make the bill constitutional is no longer part of the bill, and now its being scrutinized if requiring citizens to buy a product or be fined by the government is constitutional, which it isn't. I'm not holding my breath as I doubt this is the end of Obamacare. It opens the door, but there's plenty of other things the SCOTUS can cherry pick to call it constitutional.