🐱 People are mad about ‘Ghostbusters’ again

CatParty
https://www.dailydot.com/parsec/new-ghostbusters-sequel-backlash/

Director Jason Reitman revealed on Tuesday that he was called to direct and co-write an upcoming new Ghostbusters movie that follows the original 1984 film directed by his own father, Ivan Reitman, Entertainment Weekly reports. “Finally got the keys to the car,” Jason tweeted.

But before you can say “who ya gonna call?” the backlash percolated online.

In a few months, Sony Pictures plans to begin shooting the film slated for a summer 2020 release, with the older Reitman as producer this time.

“This is the next chapter in the original franchise. It is not a reboot. What happened in the ‘80s happened in the ‘80s, and this is set in the present day,” Jason told EW. “We have a lot of wonderful surprises and new characters for the audience to meet,” he continued.

It’s too early to tell who’s part of the cast, who will be the new characters, and what the plot will be about. However, it’s also highly unlikely the original actors like Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, and Ernie Hudson will star.

Meanwhile, Jason has reportedly “begun testing teenagers for four mystery roles,” according to sources, says Variety. Sources cited by the Hollywood Reporter even went so far as to say he’s looking to cast two boys and two girls. The project was supposedly so covert, the studio even used fake title “Rust City” to “keep the news under wraps until plans were ready to be unveiled,” Varietyadds.

One thing’s for sure, according to EW: It won’t be related to Sony Pictures’ 2016 all-female Ghostbusters reboot directed by Paul Feig, and which starred Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones, Kristen Wiig, and Melissa McCarthy.

Even with very little information about the new installment in the famous franchise, already, Tuesday’s announcement of a Ghostbusters “sequel” did not sit well with users on Twitter for different reasons.

For starters, a lot of people are disappointed the all-female reboot is not slated for a sequel.

upload_2019-1-16_8-6-52.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-9.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-21.png

What upsets some is how it appears that Ghostbusters’ producers are pandering to people (read: sexist males and other haters) who didn’t want the all-female reboot in the first place, and who will then consider this “winning”:

upload_2019-1-16_8-7-50.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-4.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-8-17.png

upload_2019-1-16_8-9-23.png


As to be expected, a lot are calling this reboot unnecessary, and even self-proclaimed fans of the entire Ghostbustersfranchise are among them. As @gracerandolph tweets, “So what if it’s in the same ‘universe’?! If new #Ghostbusters doesn’t star #BillMurray #DanAkroyd #ErnieHudson #SigourneyWeaver … nobody cares.”
The only apparent good news this time around: At least the backlash to the latest installment isn’t as sexist.

As a Ghostbusters fan since childhood, I’ll leave this here: “The Ghostbusters universe is big enough to hold a lot of different stories,” Reitman told EW. I daresay truly devoted fans will watch any iteration of this classic.
 
For starters, a lot of people are disappointed the all-female reboot is not slated for a sequel.

People seriously want a sequel to that dumpster fire? Taking out all of the sexism and political bullshit, what more does that movie have to offer? You have to be brain damaged or mentally handicapped to want more of the 2016 reboot. It's a cinematic disaster that should be mocked by everyone.

I'm not even particularly excited for yet another Ghostbusters movie, but if they can somehow make it as good as the original, then I don't mind. The strange thing about this announcement is that it's only been around 3 years since the 2016 reboot released. Was there a huge demand for more Ghostbusters? Why are people so complacent with rehashing the same intellectual property over and over and over again? How many Godzilla and King Kong movies can people handle before realizing that these movies have been recreated for nearly half a century?

They can say it's not a reboot all they want, but the bottom line is that it's deriving from extant source material. You'd think that entertainment would strive for creativity and innovation, but it's obvious that movies nowadays are blatant cash grabs. Don't even get me started on the oversaturation of superhero movies.

The Ghostbusters universe is big enough to hold a lot of different stories,

This quote really stuck out to me. I'm sure that there's plenty of new stories you can tell within the universe that are interesting. However, why not take a risk and think of something new? Just because you can make more stories in the Ghostbusters universe doesn't mean that you should depend on the source material for new ideas. Only make a story if you feel like it deserves to be told.

Look at Star Wars. You can create an infinite amount of stories in that universe, but that doesn't mean that these stories will be good. The Last Jedi is proof of that. Why do movies insist on spelling out everything to the audience and leaving little room for interpretation? Let the audience enjoy the universe and exercise their imagination.

The original Ghostbusters was enough for me, and I'm disappointed to see such a stagnate environment in American entertainment.
 
Last edited:
Here's the thing: Nobody liked the ghostbusters reboot. It was like daily show comedy. People acted like they liked it to pwn the sexists, or liked it because their ideology demanded it.

In reality, it was... just a boring typical hollywood no substance movie, with a few funny parts but mostly forgettable. Of course they're not going to make a sequel to that.
 
Meanwhile, Jason has reportedly “begun testing teenagers for four mystery roles,” according to sources, says Variety. Sources cited by the Hollywood Reporter even went so far as to say he’s looking to cast two boys and two girls.

Four teenagers you say? Sounds like Extreme Ghostbusters
69BB9393-FD62-4E2F-919D-706409299B1B.jpeg


Look at that D I V E R S I T Y.

2 boys and 2 girls? Well if it had to be any of them, the one in the black one is going to get gender-flipped. Hollywood loves black wimmins.

But for real though, holy shit that salt. Can we just make a new IP, or is my generation entirely devoid of creativity?
 
yeah,nah i think ill skip this the originals are good shit and i never saw the need for a reboot or a 'where are they now' esque film.
 
If there's something strange
In your neighborhood
Who ya gonna call?
A studio executive who will put an end to this nonsense

Why does Hollywood have to reboot everything? Have they really run out of ideas so badly?
Even with the sob story these 100 billion dollar corporations will spin about how much it hurts them to be at the center of controversy or whatever, it's still less of a profit risk than creating a new IP.
 
You will never fucking win with feminists. Any time you placate their shrill cries, the next time you don't bow to them they will scream twice as loud. I might've even paid to see the trash fire reboot if it wasn't preceded by a chorus of hollering and viral marketing that could only be described as calling your fanbase a bunch of exceptional manbabies. I'm so glad I didn't, because now it's so much easier to make peace with not seeing reboots and spending more time watching classics and some fresh new IP that I had no idea even existed because they weren't catering to some sick media tribalism fetish.
 
If there's something strange
In your neighborhood
Who ya gonna call?
A studio executive who will put an end to this nonsense

Why does Hollywood have to reboot everything? Have they really run out of ideas so badly?


Yes.

They became really risk-adverse at the turn of the millennium. I don't know why, but, they started just issuing sequels to threadbare IPs exclusively at that point. Creativity and new ideas were tossed out as they didn't fit the financial model of quicker, cheaper, bigger. It's like they decided movies as entertainment in 2 hour capsules was the "old" way to do it, the 21st Century modern way was movies-as-subscriptions to certain fan demographics. You picked a franchise and stayed with it for 'new' material every x months.....

Entrenched laziness and creative bankruptcy were inevitable at that point.

And now they're even in more trouble because the source material on those IPs has been declared problematic by the woke crowd in CURRENT YEAR, so they have to "reimagine" and "reboot" them with dangerhair and shattering the patricarchy, which only makes them rot harder.
 
Back