The drama really has been kicked up a turn in this thread.
So,
@Meow and Ruff, you claimed that you posted proof a bit in the thread ago and claimed it was definite but the issue is that in this case with Simba, it really isn't. It's circumstantial at best. If you want to make me start believing you, catalog everything in one neat master post. That might start helping you out.
But to be frank, on looking back at what you posted, a one thing popped out at me in your posts.
At first, the post seems innocent but at another glance, it's quite suspicious. The reason it's suspect is that you came
after this was dropped:
Which has some proof that shows that he
has done exactly as accused, and lists every account he has. But the accusing part gets me because it's clear all these accounts are more than likely Simba; but that sentence is also suspect because more notably, you came running straight in after tired had stated this:
And not only that, acting as if "you're on the fence" when you've mostly been white-knighting Simba. Not just white-knighting, but
deflecting for him as well, trying to lay blame on his accusers. Which strikes me odd; it wouldn't be so hard to defend him but you still take the time to try and discredit his accusers all the same. Not only that, you had blatantly stated that you had stated that it's "a meme to accuse everyone defending Simba as Simba himself" despite the only one really defending him is you and that's after these receipts were dropped.
Basically, you're starting to make me wonder if you're Simba himself. Considering he's known for sockpuppeting, this isn't too far-fetched an idea, no matter what you may say. The only person who stands to gain from defending Simba is, well,
Simba. Especially here of all places.