Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

OK OK, thugs, terrorists, and academic intellectuals then.
Academics
please respond

680151
Acosta is having a cry because he didn't get called on for a question in Hanoi, his timeline is full of it. Trump also took questions from at least ABC, Bloomberg, CBS, NPR, NYT and was asked about Cohen, so why would he need to call on CNN? Maybe Trump didn't call on Acosta as he deliberateley tried to sabotage the last summit meeting with NK.
680152
Here is a NYT reporter Acosta retweeted, because you wouldn't want to take any questions from the media of a major competitive power in the region. The same power that is currently propping up NK and is the reason why it is still a thing.
 
Academics
please respond

View attachment 680151
Acosta is having a cry because he didn't get called on for a question in Hanoi, his timeline is full of it. Trump also took questions from at least ABC, Bloomberg, CBS, NPR, NYT and was asked about Cohen, so why would he need to call on CNN? Maybe Trump didn't call on Acosta as he deliberateley tried to sabotage the last summit meeting with NK.
View attachment 680152
Here is a NYT reporter Acosta retweeted, because you wouldn't want to take any questions from the media of a major competitive power in the region. The same power that is currently propping up NK and is the reason why it is still a thing.
Maybe because Acosta is an autistic faggot who, if Trump was HALF the monster the Dems claim he is, would've simply vanished a year ago because of how annoying he was.
 
Maybe because Acosta is an autistic faggot who, if Trump was HALF the monster the Dems claim he is, would've simply vanished a year ago because of how annoying he was.

For the past two years, my parents (specifically, my dad) has been saying to me on every new Trump update, "Yo boy is going to prison this time!" and he still keeps thinking that. TWO YEARS and he has not given up on the fact that Trump hasn't broken the law on everything he's done even if some of the thing's he's done was kind of lowkey jerky, even if he's trying to cover himself. I know they are both like one of CNN's 700,000 viewers, but does he ever question, if it's all a farce and that hoping Trump is a criminal is a means to an end?
 
For the past two years, my parents (specifically, my dad) has been saying to me on every new Trump update, "Yo boy is going to prison this time!" and he still keeps thinking that. TWO YEARS and he has not given up on the fact that Trump hasn't broken the law on everything he's done even if some of the thing's he's done was kind of lowkey jerky, even if he's trying to cover himself. I know they are both like one of CNN's 700,000 viewers, but does he ever question, if it's all a farce and that hoping Trump is a criminal is a means to an end?
Just tell him off. Be harsh. Be firm.
 
So, basically a lot like the West today?
I might be living under a rock, but do all university students in the West have to study mandatory "Scientific Communism" courses and learn the main theses of the recent Communist Party congress by heart? Or put a reference to the General Secretary of the Central Committee's Politburo and the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet [insert name here] in the introduction to every single research paper regardless of topic?

J. Edgar Hoover shouldn't have decimated the CPUSA in the 1950s - maybe then the opponents of communist ideology would have been more aware of what they're fighting against.
 
Last edited:
Why is that even allowed in college? Why are professors allowed to tank grades over "wrong" politics? Someone should sue over that.
Because it would be insanely hard to prove. Fact of the matter is that being in a teacher’s good graces benefits you in a class. I think that’s just always been true. I’ve never seen a teacher specifically mark a student down for “wrongthink” but I’ve seen plenty of examples of students disagreeing with teachers and suddenly having their grades get worse and chances for extra credit disappearing.

In high school, I had a lit teacher who was practically a black nationalist. On two seperate occasions me and several of my white male friends got marked wrong for putting the EXACT SAME ANSWER on a quiz as my black female friend. I brought it up to the teacher both times, and both times she said she would give me the points back if I wrote a 3-page paper about why I thought I was correct. That’s the closest I’ve ever seen to tangible evidence of discrimination, and I wish I had been smart enough back then to deal with it.
 
Because it would be insanely hard to prove. Fact of the matter is that being in a teacher’s good graces benefits you in a class. I think that’s just always been true. I’ve never seen a teacher specifically mark a student down for “wrongthink” but I’ve seen plenty of examples of students disagreeing with teachers and suddenly having their grades get worse and chances for extra credit disappearing.

In high school, I had a lit teacher who was practically a black nationalist. On two seperate occasions me and several of my white male friends got marked wrong for putting the EXACT SAME ANSWER on a quiz as my black female friend. I brought it up to the teacher both times, and both times she said she would give me the points back if I wrote a 3-page paper about why I thought I was correct. That’s the closest I’ve ever seen to tangible evidence of discrimination, and I wish I had been smart enough back then to deal with it.
Yeah, that's the sort of thing where you photocopy both tests, drop the copies on the principal's desk, and ask them if they want to be famous. Sheesh.
 
All college grading should be done anonymously.

I might be living under a rock, but do all university students in the West have to study mandatory "Scientific Communism" courses and learn the main theses of the recent Communist Party congress by heart?

No, its largely going to depend on the school and the program. Degree programs in America will have a mandatory "liberal arts" requirement, but you typically have a choice of what classes you take to fulfill that requirement. Making sure you read and understand the course description is essential in avoiding social justice conditioning. For example, I took an American Literature course and the only American Literature discussed was grievance literature by a rainbow coalition of whiners. Then I got a little wiser and took Women in the Bible and the professor was a hardcore Catholic who convinced all the women in the class that they had a moral obligation to perform oral sex on their husbands. Much better.

That said, the guy is getting a degree in Political Science, which is just about the most pozzed degree program in existence. Think of Political Science as what happens when the fart huffers who watch John Oliver religiously decide to get together and start a college. He probably wouldn't have to deal with nearly as much bullshit if he went for accounting or engineering, but, again, its going to depend on the school. AOC famously has a degree in economics and yet somehow knows less about the economy than the average child.
 
it only cost him everything because the left will destroy anybody who shared the same air as Trump.

A more honest headline would be, “Being adjacent to Trump has made me a human piñata to shady people in power.”

And they want this same air of fear to carry over into the 2020 re-election campaign. Nobody wants to work for a temporary gig if it means they might lose everything afterwards.

The sad thing is that that left are oblivious towards how the right will react if and when they are out of power. As if to say, they truly think that if they take back the White House, even it's under a centrist type that demands peace and coexistence, that the right will just forget the last 4-8 years of the let ceding ANY claim of the moral high ground with some of the shit they've pulled.

It's why garbage like AOC demanding a huge purge of moderates/blue dogs is so fucking self-defeating because if they go, then this further fucks them up getting anything remotely resembling a majority in Congress. And nothing short of a veto proof majority will stop the Democrats from being rightfully punished like they've never been punished before, from a Republican controlled Congress who want revenge on the Democrats/the next Democrat President after what was done to Trump and company.
 
I'm beginning to think we need a Liberal Content rating to denote comical hypocrisy.

You mean for something like the INSANE goal post moving of the Mueller investigation.

681897

Yes, its Trump's fault you've been calling him Papa Mueller and performing songs celebrating his virtue for the last two years.

681899
 
Back