Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Asian chicks seem to have this thing where they either look like they're in their 20s when they're in their 60s or look like some kind of reptile by the time they hit their 40s.

Let's just say she looks like she's going to be a dragon lady before too long.

Yeah, they don't all age as well as Mari Iijima.

I'd still smash her even if she is 55.

Anime Maru did a fucking hilarious article about this.


Also, my bringing this up is totally topical. Honest!

683139
 
ANN recently put out a survey on drumming up money since they're almost broke. I guess this is how ANN plans to drum up legal fees

View attachment 683068

For the low low price of $3000, you too can pretend your friends with your favorite ANN staffer and hang out with them in Japan!

  1. Watch most of the results be option number 1 (can't afford it).
  2. It's already been brought up, but tours are about half the price of this package
  3. If ANN are as insufferable IRL as they are online, why would I want to spend any time with them in general, let alone a foreign country?
 
  1. Watch most of the results be option number 1 (can't afford it).
  2. It's already been brought up, but tours are about half the price of this package
  3. If ANN are as insufferable IRL as they are online, why would I want to spend any time with them in general, let alone a foreign country?

If it's $1500 markup, then you'd expect sex right?
 
So I guess they're gonna try one last push to have the GFM killed?

683163


Yeah, I've gotta bit of yellow fever too, but she's that 6/10 asian girl that probably attracts the type of white dude who wants to have his girlfriend cosplay in bed.

Like I said. Not hideous. Not hot.

If it's $1500 markup, then you'd expect sex right?

Bamboo ain't worth $1,500, and all the rest would have to pay me for the privilege.
 
That is so off base that it is not even wrong. My only regret is that I have only two palms to facepalm with.
Try using your feet for a quad facepalm. But let's be honest if that's PULL's best and brightest, because if that is so, then we just do what we usually do.
 
That is so off base that it is not even wrong. My only regret is that I have only two palms to facepalm with.
Well, I'm not a lawyer. Why are they going off base this time?
 
Well, I'm not a lawyer. Why are they going off base this time?

Does whoever wrote that even own a TV? Or read a newspaper? Ever? Lawyers constantly publicly state that they intend to sue and usually much more bombastically than Ty did. There is absolutely no ethical issue with it other than if it somehow prejudices the proceedings.

The idea that it invalidates attorney-client privilege is literally moronic. Unless he is talking about privileged communications, it does not. The intention that a client intends to pursue legal action about harm they have experienced to their public reputation is a public-facing statement.

Anyone pursuing defamation claims is going to announce this in public, in the same media where the defamation occurred, to get in front of the damage to their reputation and control it. This is part of why you hire a lawyer to do that in the first place.

Every word of that post is dumb beyond belief.
 
They still think Nick is subject to discipline for talking about a case he's not going to be counsel in.

Also, they're STILL thinking he's not a lawyer.

They're deranged.

It's even more off-base about Nick.

They're also chimping about Ty Beard's "We will be in touch."
 
Oh God. He's getting stupider by the minute...

GFM actually kiled the wall because it was fraudulent. He doesn't know GFM killed the wall. He's too stupid to even use the correct argument to the other stupids who brought up the wall. He can't even win when the other side is wrong.

683184


Latest archive snapshot of the stupid is here:

 
Does whoever wrote that even own a TV? Or read a newspaper? Ever? Lawyers constantly publicly state that they intend to sue and usually much more bombastically than Ty did. There is absolutely no ethical issue with it other than if it somehow prejudices the proceedings.

The idea that it invalidates attorney-client privilege is literally moronic. Unless he is talking about privileged communications, it does not. The intention that a client intends to pursue legal action about harm they have experienced to their public reputation is a public-facing statement.

Anyone pursuing defamation claims is going to announce this in public, in the same media where the defamation occurred, to get in front of the damage to their reputation and control it. This is part of why you hire a lawyer to do that in the first place.

Every word of that post is dumb beyond belief.


#kickvic is not sending their best folks, let me tell you. They are sending their soy, their potatoes and their shrieking attention whores, and some, I admit, may be very smart people. Very smart. But that's not what we're getting. Sad.

Oh God. He's getting stupider by the minute...

GFM actually kiled the wall because it was fraudulent. He doesn't know GFM killed the wall. He's too stupid to even use the correct argument to the other stupids who brought up the wall. He can't even win when the other side is wrong.

View attachment 683184

Latest archive snapshot of the stupid is here:


Are we sure this is not Monica using her husband's twitter? Because he sounds like a bitchy little girl
 
and some, I admit, may be very smart people.

Name ONE.

Obviously you don't include the ones that are sperging, but name one person who made a simple statement of "Kick Vic," who is not a retard.

I'll wait.

EDIT: Whoever wanted the PULL stuff sent to Nick, you got your wish.

683188
 
Back