NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

I'm not sure how this ban fits into the ResetERA canon:
690462


The news story:
The 11-year-old was reportedly upset that his parents took his video games away and devised the plan at school that day to shoot his father.

“The boy said he went into his parent's bedroom with the gun and decided to wait ‘about 10 minutes’ until his dad rolled over and was facing away from the door so that ‘he wouldn't see me shooting him,’” court documents described, according to WSBT.

During a conversation with officers after the shooting, WSBT reported the 11-year-old also warned that if he didn’t get a PlayStation, an Xbox and a computer there would be a “part two.”
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Ms. Cegination and 13 others
Emperor Julian said:
Makes sense restera banning process has patterns not principles, at best its mercurial.
Click to expand...

Well, it depends upon the principles.

Plenty of people were banned for "victim blaming" because they questioned Jussie Smollett's absurd story, as it sounded like the first five minutes of an episode of Law & Order: SVU. Who in their right mind didn't immediately see that as bullshit? And yet, plenty of people were victim blaming in a Michael Jackson thread, which just so happened to be about paedophilla.

Hmm.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Feline Darkmage and 7 others
Agent of Z.O.G. said:
These guys be like
like all
they be like
devil triggered and shit
View attachment 690522
context is there's a shot of a woman's butt but it's covered by a light in the PS4 edition.
Click to expand...
Beyond pathetic. The posts they marked as misogynistic and trolling were completely reasonable and the Puritan joke was on point.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Feline Darkmage, Sven and 13 others
Poor Choices said:
These people have been a self parody for awhile but I never really thought they'd get around to defending ISIS recruits. Live and learn I guess.
Click to expand...

LOL. This is an immigrant woman, so OF COURSE they're acting like she's just some poor innocent creature who "accidentally" ran off to join a terrorist group. If this was the exact same situation with an EVIL WHITE MALE, they'd be calling for him to be thrown in prison and toss away the key.
 
  • Agree
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Silence of the Troons and 11 others
Wells she isnt a immigrant women, she was born and raised here so she's a traitor. The issues pretty complex and I personally believe making a here non-citizen implies we're okay to revoke your citizenship and we'll just let you go and will fob our problems off on other peoples. But reesetera can only really see it through american-centric narritives of poor oppressed immigrants wereas it's most likely the goverment washing their hands of her because they can't be bothered with any of this shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Feline Darkmage, Ms. Cegination and 4 others
If it was a white dude radicalized online that was caught before he did anything, they would not be pushing for deradicalization or sympathy. Personally, I'm not sure if the correct option is to leave these women where they are or bring them back and try them. Both could cause problems, and keeping these highly public trials running smoothly would require a lot of taxpayer money.

What is NOT an option is "deradicalizing" them and letting them off the hook like I've seen labour and democrat cucks suggest, it's insane.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Silence of the Troons, Ms. Cegination and 8 others
HeyYou said:
If it was a white dude radicalized online that was caught before he did anything, they would not be pushing for deradicalization or sympathy. Personally, I'm not sure if the correct option is to leave these women where they are or bring them back try them. Both could cause problems, and keeping these highly public trials running smoothly would require a lot of taxpayer money.

What is NOT an option is "deradicalizing" them and letting them off the hook like I've seen labour and democrat cucks suggest, it's insane.
Click to expand...
The best option at this point is the world agreeing to glass the middle east and just be done with it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Human Institute Director and 8 others
Whenever I look, most of that thread always seems like totally dudes; as in listed their gender as "Male" on their account. They like to go there and bitch about how other threads aren't upset enough about the newest "hypersexualized" ladies. Which can mean anything from the Dead or Alive games to a woman exposing her "femoral artery" carelessly.

Like these are all self-proclaimed "male":
691432

691431

691430
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Slap47 and 5 others
Men are very much sexualized in mainstream media, just in different ways than women are.

Is Hugh Jackman not sexualized?
691439


What about Channing Tatum?
691442


Oh they said AAA gaming? Here's Geralt, isn't he "sexy"?
691443


Jacob Taylor...

691445


Maybe, just maybe, men are sexualized differently from women, in ways that don't always revolve around "sexy, revealing clothing".
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, FuckedUp, Feline Darkmage and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back