Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children


I love how they decided to throw in a hatchet and a Opinel.

"Hang on, let me fell this sapling with my hatchet, then whittle a stick with my pocketknife to poke you with. "

That first rifle is a fucking pellet gun, isn't it? All of these people are fucking nuts.
 
Hold the fuck up--this child is "exploring" other children's penises and her mother's only concern is getting her a fake penis of her own?

I'm pretty sure that any female child who has enough awareness of physical sex to specifically think of penises when she conceptualizes a "boy" has experienced some sort of sexual abuse or molestation.
That's why the troon ideology is a godsend to pedophiles. When their victims develop psychological symptoms, parents and schools will just think the kids are really being "trans".
 
Last edited:
I love how they decided to throw in a hatchet and a Opinel.

"Hang on, let me fell this sapling with my hatchet, then whittle a stick with my pocketknife to poke you with. "

That first rifle is a fucking pellet gun, isn't it? lAl of these people are fucking nuts.
from what I can gather, the picture with the hatchet and pellet gun was from random mentally ill sperg on reddit showing off all the self defense shit she owns because she is paranoid about being a victim of male violence. Posting the picture and saying "4thwavenow conspired to murder trannies" is reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal dishonest.
 
More on the parents' group: a person who used to be a member of it shared her story https://twitter.com/BJontry/status/1106387148704354304
696501

696498
696497

Somebody who is part of the cult, sorry, group also shows and complains about "muh intrusion on privacy" (despite the names being censored)
696499
696500

"Be open to discussion" :story:
 
More on the parents' group: a person who used to be a member of it shared her story https://twitter.com/BJontry/status/1106387148704354304
View attachment 696501
View attachment 696498View attachment 696497
Somebody who is part of the cult, sorry, group also shows and complains about "muh intrusion on privacy" (despite the names being censored)
View attachment 696499View attachment 696500
"Be open to discussion" :story:

Three bullet points:
  1. Holy shit this is fucked up.
  2. The uncensored materials should go to the appropriate CPS agencies pronto.
  3. "Muh invasion of privacy" is the worst defensive tack to take, because in so doing you admit that this stuff is real, you fucking speds.
 
Three bullet points:
  1. Holy shit this is fucked up.
  2. The uncensored materials should go to the appropriate CPS agencies pronto.
  3. "Muh invasion of privacy" is the worst defensive tack to take, because in so doing you admit that this stuff is real, you fucking speds.
CPS gets trained by groups like Gender Spectrum and Mermaids. They've drunk the koolaid.
 
More on the parents' group: a person who used to be a member of it shared her story https://twitter.com/BJontry/status/1106387148704354304
View attachment 696501
View attachment 696498View attachment 696497
Somebody who is part of the cult, sorry, group also shows and complains about "muh intrusion on privacy" (despite the names being censored)
View attachment 696499View attachment 696500
"Be open to discussion" :story:

I've never felt such relief as when I went to her twitter profile and saw
697231


4th wave has an article from the daughter and it's so insanely damming how her concept of being transgender and her experience was because she wasn't ready for everything that came along with puberty (which almost nobody really is) and her peers / those in her age and interests proclaiming themselves to be trans. Her therapist recognized she had dysphoria but treated it was a mental health issue that it is.
 
I can't find studies about the size and function of ovaries of previously healthy girls after administration GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonists given to girls undergoing anti-cancer chemotherapy, seem to paradoxically protect their ovaries against toxic drugs.
I could be misinterpreting the study, but they're only getting Lupron while they're undergoing chemotherapy, right? There's plenty of drugs that have significantly more harmful effects after long term use, and kids are on Lupron as hormone blockers for years.
 
I could be misinterpreting the study, but they're only getting Lupron while they're undergoing chemotherapy, right? There's plenty of drugs that have significantly more harmful effects after long term use, and kids are on Lupron as hormone blockers for years.
Lupron is a chemotherapy drug though. It was developed for men with prostate cancer (who are palliative) because it inhibits the effect of sex hormones produced in the body. It has also been used for endometriosis and in IVF treatments in adult women (cuts out the natural hormone cycle so artificial hormones can be used without "interference") but this drug is not to be used continuously for more than 6 months in adults. It was first used in children on young girls with precocious puberty (I.e. 8 years old with breast/pubic hair development or starting menarche - allowing a child this young to start puberty will result in a very small adult who will likely have issues carrying a child etc.) but was also used on girls whose parents wanted them to be taller (!) I think. This started in the 1980s, I think. There are many examples of children who underwent these treatments and grew up needing hip replacements in their 20s, who have cracking, peeling teeth and debilitating chronic pain. They were also taken OFF lupron as soon as possible, not put ON lupron at a time when their bodies are supposed to be flooded with sex hormones. That is the protocol for trans kids and there is no long term data as I believe that only started in 2008.

The makers of lupron have already paid out an 845 million dollar class action lawsuit. There are tens of thousands of reported adverse effects. It has been shown to permanently lower IQ, and causes severe, intractable depression - jazz is a perfect example of this. It is not a harmless drug that leaves no effect on the body, and preventing sexual maturation will result in permanent sterility once cross sex hormones are taken. If taken before the onset of puberty, sexual maturity will never occur. It's especially fucked that trans kids are taking it for years at a time when they should be developing into adults.

Lupron is not the same as spiro, which suppresses testosterone. If any of this information is incorrect, please feel free to correct me - but don't use a tweet or blog post from Zinnia Jones as your evidence.
 
It was that they wanted girls to be shorter, because their projected natural height was considered too tall for a woman, iirc.

Lupron is a chemotherapy drug, but my understanding of the study was that it was being used to hopefully prevent ovarian failure in women getting a different chemotherapy drug.

If the manufacturers have already been sued for the drug's harmful effects, why are they still allowed to produce it? Why do they still want to produce it--they don't think they're going to get more costly lawsuits down the line from using it for trans kids?
 
It was that they wanted girls to be shorter, because their projected natural height was considered too tall for a woman, iirc.

Lupron is a chemotherapy drug, but my understanding of the study was that it was being used to hopefully prevent ovarian failure in women getting a different chemotherapy drug.

If the manufacturers have already been sued for the drug's harmful effects, why are they still allowed to produce it? Why do they still want to produce it--they don't think they're going to get more costly lawsuits down the line from using it for trans kids?
I'm guessing because those are all off label uses of the drug and the pediatric version is incredibly expensive, which implies to me that the liability is built in for those using it for precocious puberty. Estrogen eventually closes growth plates, so I'm not sure how suppressing it would make females shorter. As for why they continue to manufacture dangerous drugs, which is true of a great deal of drugs, the answer is money, and a very narrow legitimate use for the drug, such as what it was originally developed for.
 
Are there consequences for doctors who prescribe drugs off-label when they go wrong? My impression is that off-label prescribing is meant for truly dire situations, like when they pulled out random 60s cancer drugs in the hopes they'd work for AIDS. There seems to be a lot of bad off-label prescribing of psychiatric medication right now (I've read about insomniacs getting permanent tardive dyskinesia from anti-psychotics), and I think we're going to see lawsuits about that before we see it about tranny drugs.
 
Are there consequences for doctors who prescribe drugs off-label when they go wrong? My impression is that off-label prescribing is meant for truly dire situations, like when they pulled out random 60s cancer drugs in the hopes they'd work for AIDS. There seems to be a lot of bad off-label prescribing of psychiatric medication right now (I've read about insomniacs getting permanent tardive dyskinesia from anti-psychotics), and I think we're going to see lawsuits about that before we see it about tranny drugs.
I don't know what the legal consequence of prescribing dangerous drugs to children off label is, but I do know there is a great deal of pressure on these providers to affirm transgender identity and that it is presented as a matter of life and death; they love telling these parents (and indirectly their kids) that their kids will kill themselves if their identity is not confirmed. "Would you rather have a dead son or a live daughter?" Even exploring reasons why a child or teenager might be uncomfortable in their body is frowned upon as conversion therapy. Off label prescribing happens all the time though I think the restrictions are on advertising the drug for off label use, not prescribing, and the patient needs to be informed that the use is off label and of the potential consequences.
 
It was that they wanted girls to be shorter, because their projected natural height was considered too tall for a woman, iirc.

If you're talking about Lupron and similar drugs, it's the other way around. Those drugs can be used to delay puberty so kids will grow taller. Girls who were expected to be "too tall" were (and sometimes still are) treated the opposite way, giving them extra hormones so they go through puberty earlier rather than suppressing the hormones like puberty blockers do. That treatment is associated with its own set of lifelong problems.


When Laura was growing up in a small New England town, her parents and doctors worried that her predicted adult height threatened her future happiness. Laura's tall mother had been teased and embarrassed about her own height at school. When the local paediatrician mentioned that a specialist might be able to stunt Laura's growth and spare her the social pain of towering over boys as an adolescent and men as an adult, her family agreed. A paediatric endocrinologist affiliated with a prestigious US academic medical centre confidently prescribed the synthetic oestrogen diethylstilbestrol in doses 100 times greater than the oestrogen found in today's high-dose oral contraceptives.

Laura obediently took the little coated pills, now commonly known as DES, for about 2 years. But they made her sick and when she reached adulthood and married, she experienced miscarriage after miscarriage that denied her what she most wanted in life—children. When doctors also diagnosed her with a condition that put her at risk of breast cancer, Laura wondered what effects the little pills might have had on her adult health. She didn't know at the time that other tall girls also went on to have reproductive problems after taking diethylstilbestrol and other high-dose oestrogens to stunt their growth, or that there had been concerns about the drug's potential effects on fertility and cancer even at the time her physician prescribed it. Laura didn't know because none of the physicians she consulted as an adult had heard of the treatment she had received as a child; there had been hardly any follow-up studies of these girls once they became adults.

It kind of seems like it's not a good idea to mess with kids' hormones.
 
Holy fucking shit, it's worse than bad.

For example, this kid is literally too young to know what a gender is, and therefore it's literally impossible for him to be transgender:
View attachment 694966

And to answer the question in the screenshot: the kid will almost certainly grow out of it, unless an idiot of a mother brainwashes him.
Think about how fucked up this poor kid's life is. He's only age 4 and already has a social worker attempting intervention. Odds are he's dirt poor and in Head Start, stuck with a single mom who won't take him outside every day to exercise away some of that "ADHD", won't listen to the social worker, but she will start planning for his dick chop. :heart-empty:
 
Back