@Holden :
So, I skimmed a bit through fschmidt's essay and there really isn't much to it. There are female felons, so apparently social pressure isn't enough to keep them in line. On the other hand the vast majority of males are without any previous criminal record, so they seem to be quite decent, even without police officers watching them all the time.
Almost all arguments are something like this:
If I am correct and women are primarily governed by social norms, not by government law, then women have no business voting for the reasons I gave above for children.
Even if you assume that his precedent is correct, the consequence from it simply isn't necessary. If you aren't affected by certain laws or social convention, it simply doesn't exclude you from discussing them. This is why everybody can discuss taxation rates, child welfare, regulations concerning religious groups etc.
And I stopped reading when he applied his sophistry to "rights" and "powers", by the way.
The fundamental point he and you are missing is that you fail to argue why females (or "sluts") shouldn't be acknowledged as persons.
So, let's turn the tables, shall we?
Why should rape apes have the right to be acknowledged as persons and have access to all the benefits this entails?
And, since you enthusiastically adapted their behaviour with women: Are you a rape ape and if no, why not?