Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Sorry, didn't reply before.


Rape as a crime - was always directed against chaste or married woman. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband. It never applied to sluts. Female whims like "consent" were rrelevant.
Click to expand...
Probably because women were viewed as property. The good ol' days~
 
Holden said:
Marella - people here are pro-rape and want a mass rape of women by thugs.
Click to expand...
Do you have concrete evidence, from this site, that any of its members condone rape, besides agreeing with "feminist" views that women should be damn well allowed to choose who they have sex with, just as any human being should be allowed to? Your own posts don't count either. And please don't call me a rapist because you found my post that says I'd rather adopt than conceive a child or whatever, or resort to symbolism about how denying sex or sex outside the relationship is a "rape of trust".
namazuros said:
Your evidence was that 'rape used to be a big deal, but it isn't now', which is false. Rape is still a serious crime.

What isn't viewed as serious is premarital sex, which is what you're getting so huffy over.
Click to expand...
I was also gonna bring up inter-marital sex, the point stands that premarital and inter-marital sex can be consensual.
 
Holden said:
Sorry, didn't reply before.

Rape as an act - In A Natural History of Rape, Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer define rape as "Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects." I agree with this definition and would add that homosexual rape is also possible, with the same requirement to resist to the best of your ability. But under no circumstances can a woman rape a man. This is also compatible with the common-law definition which is "carnal knowledge of a woman not one's wife, by force and against her will." Anything else is feminist corruption of justice. Nowadays a lot of people think lack of consent is sufficient, but that is something I can never accept. Rape is sex accomplished by force, and that means the victim has to resist to the best of her ability; otherwise she is letting him have it. There needs to be a causal relationship between the violence and the sex, and that is not the case if the woman doesn't bother to resist to the best of her ability. Pretending women also can be rapists is a red herring employed by feminists to obfuscate the harm done to men by feminist rape law reform, to get useful idiot males to legitimize their persecution of men.
.
Click to expand...

So battered women who are psychologically incapable of resisting really wanted it? A drunk woman who was too intoxicated to resist really wanted it?

GAH, why am I even bothering.
 
Coldgrip - there's so many posts I don't remember him challenging him but why would I fight him at all? You do know I'd have to kill him then? So it would just be easier to shoot him right away, which I'd gladly do if I could conceal this "crime".
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Deviant
Reactions: Saney, Ti-99/4A, Coldgrip and 4 others
Holden said:
Sorry, didn't reply before.

Rape as an act - In A Natural History of Rape, Randy Thornhill and Craig T. Palmer define rape as "Human copulation resisted by the victim to the best of her ability unless such resistance would probably result in death or serious injury to her or others she commonly protects." I agree with this definition and would add that homosexual rape is also possible, with the same requirement to resist to the best of your ability. But under no circumstances can a woman rape a man. This is also compatible with the common-law definition which is "carnal knowledge of a woman not one's wife, by force and against her will." Anything else is feminist corruption of justice. Nowadays a lot of people think lack of consent is sufficient, but that is something I can never accept. Rape is sex accomplished by force, and that means the victim has to resist to the best of her ability; otherwise she is letting him have it. There needs to be a causal relationship between the violence and the sex, and that is not the case if the woman doesn't bother to resist to the best of her ability. Pretending women also can be rapists is a red herring employed by feminists to obfuscate the harm done to men by feminist rape law reform, to get useful idiot males to legitimize their persecution of men.

Rape as a crime - was always directed against chaste or married woman. It was a property crime against woman's father or husband. It never applied to sluts. Female whims like "consent" were rrelevant.
Click to expand...

You keep using this word "sluts". The word you're looking for is women. W-O-M-E-N.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney, Ti-99/4A, Shiala and 1 other person
Ziltoid said:
He doesn't hate women he just wants to protect them... by taking away their rights and telling them what they can and can't do.
Click to expand...
By taking away their rights to abuse men.
Also, not telling them anything.Applying social pressure. They are now pressured into being sex slaves for apes and think this is "freedom".
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Saney, Ti-99/4A, NobleGreyHorse and 3 others
Holden said:
That's the thing, though. Saudi Arabia actually measures what is real rape. Not drunk sluts regretting their consent later or some nonsense about "marital rape".
Click to expand...
Goddamn this needs to be on bumper stickers and mugs. We need to spread the word about the glorious paradise of human rights that is Saudi Arabia!
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Saney and melty
Holden said:
By taking away their rights to abuse men.
Also, not telling them anything.Applying social pressure. They are now pressured into being sex slaves for apes and think this is "freedom".
Click to expand...

Whaddya get for your mom for your birthday? Your micropenis?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back