Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
nirx - use actual arguments, not strawmen and insults. apes have no reedming qualities whatsoever. many can't even read or write.


Just make the video and come out of the closet. Or realize you are the one keeping this thread alive. We're all laughing at you. Even more so now as this thread is slowly climbing the Google results and will soon surpass your shitty blog as a result.
 
If I understand your system correctly, you distinguish between wives, concubines and prostitutes. Wives are exclusive to husbands (that's sort of the point). Prostitutes, meanwhile, aren't exclusive to a partner all (also sort of the point). Presumably, that means concubines aren't exclusive to one man, because otherwise they wouldn't be meaningfully distinct from wives, but they aren't indiscriminate either, because otherwise they wouldn't be meaningfully distinct from prostitutes. Since husbands can have concubines, that means husbands aren't exclusive to one partner either. So what this boils down to is an N:M relationship within a chosen group of men and women. So your system comes down to, well, a complicated type of polygamy.
finally somebody with a brain. though i will say that concubines could be used by only one man. also, they would be used for sex. it would be bad for men to invest in them too much emotionally.
 
nirx - use actual arguments, not strawmen and insults. apes have no reedming qualities whatsoever. many can't even read or write.
Why is it ok for you to generalize, but whenever anyone else gives their experiences you call it 'strawmanning'? That isn't even the proper term for this sort of thing.
 
Forced vasectomies are silly, but forced chastity and sexual servitude is a worthwhile society to stride towards?
i told you why it is not forced nor sexual servitiude. if you can't understand it i'm very sorry

Why is it ok for you to generalize, but whenever anyone else gives their experiences you call it 'strawmanning'? That isn't even the proper term for this sort of thing.
i don't care about his experiences. he calls me names and strawmans my arguments.
 
i told you why it is not forced nor sexual servitiude. if you can't understand it i'm very sorry
If you tell me "you are allowed to be either a virgin, concubine, or prostitute" and I tell you that I want to be none of those, then that is forced.

I know you think you can speak for women, but this is not he way the real world works. If someone doesn't want to do something, you forcing them to do it is violating their consent.
 
If you tell me "you are allowed to be either a virgin, concubine, or prostitute" and I tell you that I want to be none of those, then that is forced.

I know you think you can speak for women, but this is not he way the real world works. If someone doesn't want to do something, you forcing them to do it is violating their consent.
i explained this. you can also be a slut but only the worst women would want to be that since it would be against the dominant culture and sluts would have no legal protection against rape.
 
i don't care about his experiences. he calls me names and strawmans my arguments.
What do you think strawmanning is, by the way? Just curious. Because I view strawmanning as a biased misrepresentation of an argument. A strawman of your argument would be my proposal to force vasectomies on men, in order to mock how ridiculous your Elliot Rogers-inspired paradise was.
 
I slept for like 8 hours. This thread has another 80 PAGES and Holden is still fighting the good fight.

I guess that's decent proof that it's not an elaborate prank.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Duke Nukem
ca ira- you don't seem like a complete exceptional individual. so don't be.
Merci beaucoup. I do feel that you invite people to throw aside their inhibitions when you frankly dehumanize the entire female gender, though-- I'm sure it's not hard to imagine why someone who disagreed would react disdainfully to that.

Anyhow, since we're talking-- when you say women want "apes," what exactly do you mean? I, for instance, am bookish and not especially masculine or dominating, yet I do find myself enjoying erotic adventures with ladies from time to time. Am I an exception to the rule, or might I be an "ape" without knowing it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BriarHeart
What do you think strawmanning is, by the way? Just curious. Because I view strawmanning as a biased misrepresentation of an argument. A strawman of your argument would be my proposal to force vasectomies on men, in order to mock how ridiculous your Elliot Rogers-inspired paradise was.
so you purposely strawmanned me?

Merci beaucoup. I do feel that you invite people to throw aside their inhibitions when you frankly dehumanize the entire female gender, though-- I'm sure it's not hard to imagine why someone who disagreed would react disdainfully to that.

Anyhow, since we're talking-- when you say women want "apes," what exactly do you mean? I, for instance, am bookish and not especially masculine or dominating, yet I do find myself enjoying erotic adventures with ladies from time to time. Am I an exception to the rule, or might I be an "ape" without knowing it?
i don't dehumanize them. it's just that you think human beings are these beacons of intelligence and reason. in fact my dogs are a lot smarter than most.
as for you, i haven't met you irl or even seen you so i can't tell. make a video for me or something
 
so you purposely strawmanned me?
Yes. Hence my use of a completely ridiculous argument like SNIPPING ALL MEN'S DICKS.

Did you really believe that was a serious proposal? Yet it makes as much logical sense as yours, and I bet I could defend it just as well as you could defend your twisted ideal society.
 
i don't dehumanize them. it's just that you think human beings are these beacons of intelligence and reason. in fact my dogs are a lot smarter than most.
as for you, i haven't met you irl or even seen you so i can't tell. make a video for me or something

Well, looking at you, maybe there is truth to the "human beings are stupider than dogs" idea.

Why the fuck would anybody want to make a video for you? Do you really overestimate your importance that much? You're a creepy nutcase from Croatia, not a God.
 
I slept for like 8 hours. This thread has another 80 PAGES and Holden is still fighting the good fight.

I guess that's decent proof that it's not an elaborate prank.

I'm quite amazed he's kept the streak alive this long.

After all, he's gotta sleep sometime.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Taily Puff
200+ pages? This thread was only made yesterday! Holden, you sir are officially worse than TJ Church, at least he had the decency to try the 'If I go away perhaps it'll disappear' method of dealing with this forum.
 
as for you, i haven't met you irl or even seen you so i can't tell. make a video for me or something
Hm. Let me put it to you this way: how can I tell whether or not I am an ape? And, if I am not an ape, what other factor could account for women periodically having on-purpose sexual intercourse with me?

Oh boo-hoo. We're all sluts and rape-apes, remember?
I keep misreading your name as "Eponine."
 
Yes. Hence my use of a completely ridiculous argument like SNIPPING ALL MEN'S DICKS.

Did you really believe that was a serious proposal? Yet it makes as much logical sense as yours, and I bet I could defend it just as well as you could defend your twisted ideal society.
what am i supposed to say to you? you're obviously not able to see sense. too bad. you don't seem as dumb as most others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back