Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

They will clip the first half of a sentence from deep within the report, lie about what it means to convince people that it indicates guilt, and then attack anyone who tries to tell people to go read the full sentence for themselves.
I was thinking they would seize on some random blacked out name and start screeching for the "Uncensored" Full Report.
After that? Who knows what they'll do besides moving the goal posts as far as humanly possible. A Certificate from God wouldn't suffice at this point.
 
Yeah, how can you prove a negative?
Mueller-2.jpg



cbr032419dapr.jpg


Lol
Damn, that's some ugly art. Does TDS affect a person's ability to draw?
 
f82e8c557018b3b62dfbc00559d1ee40.png

The end of Robert Mueller’s probe marks a new phase of Donald Trump’s presidency. It also marks a new phase for the small group of citizen journalists, Twitter thread-spinners and stunt artists who rose to prominence on the back of investigation.

After devoting much of their waking lives to the investigation over the last two years, they are taking its anticlimactic demise with surprising poise. You might say that for the Mueller probe’s biggest fans, it’s not just about the number of indictments—it’s about the friends they made along the way.

Jeff Jetton, the owner of a ramen shop along Washington, D.C.’s gentrifying H Street corridor who has entangled himself in the web of journalists, hustlers and lawyers surrounding the probe, knows this well.

Jetton came to Washington’s notice in early 2017 when he scored a number of interviews with key Trump-Russia figures including former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and suspected Steele dossier source Sergei Millian for Brightest Young Things, a Washington-based marketing collective.

Jetton, who also performed public anti-Kremlin stunts and made a habit of hectoring Trump’s aides about Russia in out-of-the-blue emails on which he often copied half the Washington press corps, has made nice with many of the targets of his scrutiny.

“I still talk to Sergei Millian all the time," he said.

Jetton is planning to spend Friday night in Hell’s Kitchen taking in a concert for the trippy Russian band Little Big alongside a new pal, Felix Sater.

“Jeff is one of the nicest people I know, and I always enjoy spending time with him,” said Sater, the international man of intrigue who sits at the center of many of Trump’s ties to the former Soviet Union.

Even before the probe’s end, Jetton, 43, had already begun moving on, taking a job at the New York marketing firm R/GA. In September, married a Russian woman, complicating his Trump-Russia activism.

“I can’t be out there putting dildos on things dressed as Vladimir Putin anymore, because that could have implications for her and her family,”said Jetton, who generated media attention in July when he set a shirtless Putin mannequin astride Wall Street’s iconic bull and covered the monument in a colorful array of synthetic penises.


“I don’t see this as the end of anything. I see it as maybe the beginning. Maybe one chapter closing,” he said. “Donald Trump Jr.’s still going to be an asshole.”

For Seth Abramson, a professor at the University of New Hampshire who authored voluminous viral Twitter threads about Russian collusion, the probe’s conclusion does not even close a chapter, let alone a paragraph. “At most it's going to be an em dash in the middle of a sentence," said Abramson, who, as a poet and author in his offline life, should know.

For Abramson and others who have immersed themselves in the drama of the probe, the events of the weekend only shift the action to new settings.

“The Mueller investigation is not something that will conclude in the way that we think of investigations concluding,” Abramson said. “It will simply transform.”

Others view the Trump-Russia affair less as a story than as a part of a collective national journey. “The Mueller report is just one more roadmark on that very long highway,” said Claude Taylor, a former director of volunteers in Bill Clinton’s White House who has made it his mission to draw attention to Trump’s Russia links on Twitter and in real life.

That highway has already taken Taylor, 55, all over the country, where he has channeled anti-Trump energy on Twitter into real-life activism on land and on sea.

In 2016, Taylor closed up his Washington photo gallery and devoted more time to assailing Trump on social media with a focus on his Russia ties. Eventually he set up Mad Dog PAC to fund his activism, including purchasing billboards around the country that linked Republican politicians to Russia.

One of his most treasured memories involved renting a 30-foot motorboat, loading it with a large inflatable rat bearing Trump’s face and, “with the help of a local skipper,” navigating it up to a sea wall at the edge of Mar-a-Lago.


The hobby brought him into contact with former UK parliamentarian Louise Mensch, and the pair authored widely read articles claiming that Trump was the subject of a sealed indictment and under investigation for sex trafficking.

It turned out the pair had fallen for a hoax and none of that was true. “In terms of all the stories that have been produced about Trump and Trump-Russia,” Taylor said, “we’ll all have a good sense in the individual fullness of time of how our individual records stand up.”

Despite that hiccup, the friendship formed over their sleuthing has stood up firmly. “I remain very, very fond of her,” Taylor said of Mensch.

Mensch has perhaps gained more notoriety from the Trump-Russia affair than anybody else who was not a direct party to it. After laying out her views of the matter in the New York Times op-ed section, she memorably claimed that prosecutors were considering executing former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon for treason and that U.S. marshals had forcibly removed Trump’s first chief of staff, Reince Priebus, from Saudi Arabia, among other wild allegations.

Reached on Twitter, Mensch asked that an interview request be sent via email, but did not respond to emailed interview requests. Fortunately, she has made her views known on her blog.

For her, the formal end of Mueller’s probe is more like a technicality.

In Mensch’s unorthodox reading of Attorney General Bill Barr’s summary of the investigation, Barr actually confirms that many of Trump’s confederates are well on their way to being convicted of collusion-related crimes.

In her view, it is the president’s associates who will have the hardest transition of anyone to life after Mueller.

“The loathsome batch of traitors who are laughing tonight,” she wrote on Sunday, “will be crying tomorrow. Or on one tomorrow in the very near future.”
Archive

Is there a word for something that's both hilarious and pathetic at the exact, same time? I feel like that word would be incredibly appropriate for these people. We'd finally started to see all that birth certificate and 9/11 Truther shit start to die down and now we have to hear people scream about Russia for the next two decades, and on way more public-facing platforms than the previous conspiracy theories.

God damnit.
 
Damn, that's some ugly art. Does TDS affect a person's ability to draw?
No, political comics in general are trash.....except when they're Ben Garrison comics. Please don't harm my family, Ben.

Caricatures are a dying art; modern art in general is shit because no artist going into cartooning have been taking the time to actually learn anatomy and therefore the rules before they're breaking those rules (hence why caricatures exist, it's exaggerating a person's most well-known trait--usually a body part--though it's to bring out their shapes without making them unidentifiable). But caricatures are rayciss and ableist, didn't you know, so it's why everyone's political cartoons look like chicken scratch.

People like Garry Trudeau are a dying breed because they've found their style that makes them pop out, but they've also learned how to properly draw before coming up with their own style while learning the trade of cartooning. Trudeau also stands out among political cartoonists because he's been doing it since 1970, and he's always been critical of Trump, though I think his TDS (if he has it) is on the down-low compared to the other political cartoonists who have lost their minds.

Speaking of Doonesbury, I thought this Sunday comic from two weeks ago was funny.
707099

707101
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veracity_of_statements_by_Donald_Trump

, the president of the United States, has made many false or misleading statements. Commentators and fact-checkershave described the rate of his falsehoods as unprecedented[1] in politics,[2][3][4] and they have become a distinctive part of both his business and political identity.[5]

As of March 4, 2019, The Washington Post has identified more than 9,000 false or misleading statements since Trump took office, which averages out at more than 20 such statements per day.[6] As of March 12, 2019, fact-checking site PolitiFact has scored 460 out of 657 (or 70%) of statements made by Trump as mostly false, false or "pants on fire".[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verac..._Trump#cite_note-PolitiFact_Trump_11/8/2016-7

What even is this?

They're not wrong. Most people who aren't rich are that way because they are stupid and deserve to be manipulated and exploited.
Sorry buddy but kiwifarms hates the poor, you're in the wrong forum if this is what you believe.
So basically, your political stances are:

  1. Libertarians are terriblenastyawful people whose ideas are as bad as those of socialists.
  2. This forum is filled with Neo-Nazis that hate poor people.
  3. Rich = smart. Not rich = stupid and deserving of manipulation and exploitation

And you're supposed to be this enlightened rational...how exactly?
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veracity_of_statements_by_Donald_Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trumphttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verac..._Trump#cite_note-PolitiFact_Trump_11/8/2016-7

What even is this?

So basically, your political stances are:

  1. Libertarians are terriblenastyawful people whose ideas are as bad as those of socialists.
  2. This forum is filled with Neo-Nazis that hate poor people.
  3. Rich = smart. Not rich = stupid and deserving of manipulation and exploitation
And you're supposed to be this enlightened rational...how exactly?

Most of those lies that I saw in that Washington Post articles were slight errors in statistics and Trump assuming things like "Democrats have an easier advantage than Republicans in the election" (which they do: [California is a highly democratic neo-socialist state that has 55 electoral votes guaranteed due to its population]). in In fact, the counterpoint proves this where they basically say "Well, REEEEEpublicans have an advantage too." Most of the "lies" are assumptions and statistical errors, this doesn't mean he was lying purposefully. And I know some libtard from Reddit is gonna look at me like I'm saying "THAT'S NOT A REEEEXCUSE", but the man's a senile old fuck. He's gonna get a few stats wrong.
 
Damn, that's some ugly art. Does TDS affect a person's ability to draw?
Truly it does. The shit political art out there is fucking appalling.

On the subject of the cartoon:
Any cop or lawyer will tell you you are never found innocent, only not guilty.
 
So basically, your political stances are:

  1. Libertarians are terriblenastyawful people whose ideas are as bad as those of socialists.
  2. This forum is filled with Neo-Nazis that hate poor people.
  3. Rich = smart. Not rich = stupid and deserving of manipulation and exploitation
And you're supposed to be this enlightened rational...how exactly?

1. Yes, you can see this in how economic libertarians simultaneously pretend we exist in a free market, leading to conclusions like "poor people are poor because they're lazy and deserve it, rich people are rich because they're clever and innovative" while endlessly whining about thousands of examples of how the government manipulates the market. You'd think after complaining about government involvement in the free market for the 5903th time it might occur to them that we're not in one. Their excuse on why they're getting their ass kicked by big tech is "the government somehow made this happen", as if the entire economy isn't already the government's making.

As for social libertarians, they love freedom but they hate actually doing anything to protect it. They also love to obstruct the few libertarians who actually have the sense to try and fight back. And after bending over and giving up everyone's freedom, they'll stand on a podium and lecture everyone on how important freedom is.

2. This isn't a political stance, it's an observation.

3. The vast majority of the plebian class literally beg for the rich and the elite to exploit and oppress them. Or more accurately, do it to the other members of the plebian class because they assume the elite class wlil always be backing them. So yes, they deserve this, and any strategy that relies on the plebian class to care about the rights of anyone other than themselves is doomed to fail. The elite class do this as well of course, but they benefit from it so it's actually an intelligent decision for them.
 
1. Yes, you can see this in how economic libertarians simultaneously pretend we exist in a free market, leading to conclusions like "poor people are poor because they're lazy and deserve it, rich people are rich because they're clever and innovative" while endlessly whining about thousands of examples of how the government manipulates the market. You'd think after complaining about government involvement in the free market for the 5903th time it might occur to them that we're not in one. Their excuse on why they're getting their ass kicked by big tech is "the government somehow made this happen", as if the entire economy isn't already the government's making.

As for social libertarians, they love freedom but they hate actually doing anything to protect it. They also love to obstruct the few libertarians who actually have the sense to try and fight back. And after bending over and giving up everyone's freedom, they'll stand on a podium and lecture everyone on how important freedom is.

2. This isn't a political stance, it's an observation.

3. The vast majority of the plebian class literally beg for the rich and the elite to exploit and oppress them. Or more accurately, do it to the other members of the plebian class because they assume the elite class wlil always be backing them. So yes, they deserve this, and any strategy that relies on the plebian class to care about the rights of anyone other than themselves is doomed to fail. The elite class do this as well of course, but they benefit from it so it's actually an intelligent decision for them.


1. Nothing can be truly free, but we do live in a relatively monopolized economy where you could make money through distribution across several different companies. A "free market" means a market that you could pitch in and distribute your ideas through subsidiaries and bigger assets, where you'll either be accepted or rejected depending on how well you market yourself. So there's leeway, but not much. The government does control the economy...indirectly. I mean, after all, governmental rule is what inspires economies.

2. Bad observation. I'm a black guy. These aren't neo-nazis. I would know.

3. The plebians don't beg the rich to oppress and exploit them, unless they are completely vulnerable. The thing is, most people don't notice that they are being taken advantage of. They just passively accept it, because they think "fuck, that's life". They're not asking for it, they just don't notice. Most plebians HATE rich people, but they passively accept that "LUL, THEY CONTROL THE WORLD. WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT?", so yeah. It's only because they're so vulnerable and they just don't care and the fact that most people in this world are stupid that they get taken advantage of, they're not asking for it. Saying they are asking for it, speaks loud coming from the words of a manipulator of the masses.
 
I was looking for salt in regards to Trump and the Nobel Prize, and found a Reddit user who loves copy-pasting the same TDS-laden comments everywhere in all-caps and bolded letters, in a way reminiscent of Chris.

I found him through this thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/japan/comm...s_japans_abe_nominated_him_for_nobel/egkpynm/

http://archive.li/1GXA4


Some more comments of his:

https://www.reddit.com/user/StonerMeditation

http://archive.li/6b6bi


Wow, he seems to be quite committed into believing all of these fucking lies from fear-mongering sources. He should use Goebbel's quote for himself. I can find much more similarities of Nazi rhetoric in these media outlet than in Trump's rhetoric. Trump referenced sources (most external anecdotal sources) in his speeches and comedic rants within his speeches. The media sources he reads always try to fear-monger you into believing the "anonymous source" or take certain terms out of context for the hell of it. What long-lasting lie has Trump told that he has used to manipulate the masses with? I'd like to know, compared to that of the media passing this whole collusion story and then when it turns out to be a farce, everyone is so committed to the fucking lie that they can't even think that maybe the possibility of it being a lie is a thing. That's how the Big Lie strategy works. Trump at least proved the whole immigration thing within his books (Crippled America, especially.) as well as evidence through the people he talks to. The media pushed an agenda and did more than all the COMMUNIST FEARING in the Cold War.

And this is not to say that the people who run these media outlets are Nazis, but I'm just saying, similarities.
 
1. Yes, you can see this in how economic libertarians simultaneously pretend we exist in a free market, leading to conclusions like "poor people are poor because they're lazy and deserve it, rich people are rich because they're clever and innovative" while endlessly whining about thousands of examples of how the government manipulates the market. You'd think after complaining about government involvement in the free market for the 5903th time it might occur to them that we're not in one. Their excuse on why they're getting their ass kicked by big tech is "the government somehow made this happen", as if the entire economy isn't already the government's making.

As for social libertarians, they love freedom but they hate actually doing anything to protect it. They also love to obstruct the few libertarians who actually have the sense to try and fight back. And after bending over and giving up everyone's freedom, they'll stand on a podium and lecture everyone on how important freedom is.

2. This isn't a political stance, it's an observation.

3. The vast majority of the plebian class literally beg for the rich and the elite to exploit and oppress them. Or more accurately, do it to the other members of the plebian class because they assume the elite class wlil always be backing them. So yes, they deserve this, and any strategy that relies on the plebian class to care about the rights of anyone other than themselves is doomed to fail. The elite class do this as well of course, but they benefit from it so it's actually an intelligent decision for them.
1). We have a personal accountability problem in the United States. It's one thing to say that it may be impossible to become apart of the top 1%, but if you want to join the middle class all you need to to is follow three steps which include finishing high school, getting a full-time job, and to wait until you're at least 21 years old to get married and start having children. Of the adults who follow these rules, only 2% are in poverty and 75% are in the middle class earning around $55,000 or more per year.

Source: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/...teens-should-follow-to-join-the-middle-class/

2). Well it's a blatantly wrong observation. There are people of various political leanings here and we don't really discriminate against anyone's views unless they are unanimously decided to be retarded.

3). This take is actually somewhat agreeable, but you're wrong about it being the vast majority of people. Also, corporations will always be largely seen as insignificant when compared to the Government as you can just stop supporting a tyrannical business. Of course that is only if they aren't unique in what they are providing.
 
Back