Artcow BenTheLooney / Ben Tannehill - Drawing porn of little cartoon girls is no way to go through life, son.

Jmz_33 said:
Who wants to bet that he’s going to complain that censoring Loli-con shit would be an “infringement on his freedom of speech.”
Click to expand...
Has he ever said anything about the whole cub shit happening in discord when that was around? Sounds like something he’d be willing to defend and bitch at people who were making a big deal out of it.
 

Ben apparently became a feminist because of this movie!

Warning: This video cosists mostly of Ben whisper yelling.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: NoFeline
Even if Ben somehow had passable art and was able to distinguish his weird-o Puffy AmiYumi porn from his original work, he still wouldn’t be able to find a decent job in the industry and that’s because of his “degree” from those Art Institute of X schools. People have actually been laughed out of interviews because they wasted their money there. Instead, had he gone to SAIC (one of the few schools where Disney scouts at) he would’ve had a chance.

But I really doubt he would have gotten into SAIC, his attitude towards art would’ve really turned off anyone looking to get him in.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SpergPatrol, PsychoNerd054, Jewelsmakerguy and 5 others
"DURRRRR do you know this is the same as the whole "video games and R rated movies make you violent" argument and you're just mad cause you OBVIOUSLY can't tell the difference between fiction and reality DUUUUUUURR"

- The pedoforks that can't tell the difference between something made for entertainment and to build the fictional world and something that literally only exist to turn certain people on using children
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SpergPatrol, Eric Harris, Digital Thunder and 1 other person
Noobstopper said:
"DURRRRR do you know this is the same as the whole "video games and R rated movies make you violent" argument and you're just mad cause you OBVIOUSLY can't tell the difference between fiction and reality DUUUUUUURR"

- The pedoforks that can't tell the difference between something made for entertainment and to build the fictional world and something that literally only exist to turn certain people on using children
Click to expand...
I'm honestly getting really tired of this argument myself. People who act like violence can be judged on the same grounds as sex are complete dumb-asses and it doesn't surprise me that it's mainly lolicons who are guilty of this. They don't even understand the thing they defend so much.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NARPASSWORD, SpergPatrol, Eric Harris and 4 others
OverTheEdge said:
I'm honestly getting really tired of this argument myself. People who act like violence can be judged on the same grounds as sex are complete dumb-asses and it doesn't surprise me that it's mainly lolicons who are guilty of this. They don't even understand the thing they defend so much.
Click to expand...

What I especially get angry about is when they don't use the "it's just a drawing" argument for any other kinds of art except for their lolicon. For example

"This guy said he liked looking at gay art and pleasures himself to it every day, he is obviously gay"

"Well.... no, because it is just a drawing. It isn't a real person"

"Yeah...... but he knows the picture is suppose to be of two gay men having sex and he still likes it. Doesn't matter if it's a drawing, it shows he is gay if he looks at it every day"

...... now let's replace gay art with lolicon.

"Dude, you said you like lolicon. Art that is made for people to pleasure themselves to children. Why isn't Chris Hansen on your door"?

"HEY! It's just a drawing! So just because I like lolicon doesn't mean that I am a pedophile because it is just a drawing"

"Except, you know the drawing is suppose to be a child in a sexual light. Meaning the artist intentionally knew this was suppose to be a child and he drew it for you to get your cock wet through again..... a child. It doesn't matter at all if it's real or not, you know what it is suppose to be"

"Oh my god, this is whole "R rated movies and video games makes you violent argument" again. This is the exact same thing. So you aren't seen as violent and messed up because you like M rated games because it is just fiction, but some how I am seen as a pedophile because I jerk off to art of children having sex? How can you not see this is the exact same argument"?

I think it's either because being a pedophile is a title no one wants on them, so they try to make any excuse they can so they won't get that title although what they are doing is pedophilia so they are just denying it or they know deep inside they know what they are doing is wrong and don't want to admit it.

I mean, just think for 2 minutes. What kind of person do you need to be to jerk off to lolicon every day unless you are attracted to what you know is suppose to be in the art? As in being 100% comfortable and not uncomfortable or awkward in any way. That, should answer itself.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: howyadoin, NARPASSWORD, SpergPatrol and 5 others
kenshirhoe said:
ben is literal proof that you don't need any talent to get accepted into art school, just have enough money and be stupid enough
Click to expand...
Though he did go to an art school just as shitty as he is, so it was a perfect match. They never do anything, and now he's not doing anything while mommy and daddy have to pay for everything he does.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SpergPatrol, OverTheEdge, Chewy Suarez and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back