Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 14.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 111 24.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 83 18.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 191 41.9%

  • Total voters
    456
Who that?
721868


Better known as the commie who drew "Pepe the Frog".

edit: for context, Nick is covering Furie's copyright lawsuit against Alex Jones & InfoWars for using "Pepe" without his permission - albeit after he said publicly (when Pepe was first becoming a meme) that he doesn't mind if anyone wants to freely use Pepe. Commies are all about sharing, until someone they don't like comes along.
 
Last edited:
Yes, then that would have been fulfilled by the Hand of Justice, first of his name from the Book of Enoch; Raguel.

Raguel is the Archangel of Justice, Gabriel the Archon Scrinarii - meaning archivist, and transcribed, the messenger.

Anyone want to draw Ty as Raguel and Nick as Gabriel? Including a interpretation of Ty promising Mama Mignogna that he won't let them destroy Vic?

Because the roasting and baritone of hearing Soye get laid into by Nicky is gettin' me sticky.
721870
721871

721872
721873

721874
721875

721876
721877

721878
721879

721880
721882

721883
721884

721885
721886

721887
721889
721890
721891

I'm just loving his energy.

If Nick were a VA talent, I would hire him for baritone gruff roles and smartasses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ellesse_warrior
Nick was looking at the Matt Furie v Alex Jones case on stream. Again, this thread has been here for 2 months.

Yeah I didn't know that. My posts were moved here just yesterday/today. My initial question was why Nick got his own thread and @AnOminous replied to me saying something about Matt Furie so i thought he was the reason Nick got this thread. Clarified now Thanks.
 
Fuck each and everyone of those people who said and support that.

How much more public do they want to make shit?

To the point they think the kids are on the table?

Um we’ve done that here before just because it’s funny. So calm down
 
Um we’ve done that here before just because it’s funny. So calm down
Slow down there, cheif.
I was calm when I said that.

The full quote is:
Fuck each and everyone of those people who said and support that.

How much more public do they want to make shit?

To the point they think the kids are on the table?

Because that will only end in their collective feelings getting hurt and lives being destroyed by people finding their worst skeletons.

The highlighted and italicized portion makes it clear what my opinion and stance on it is: Dox them all.

The first three sentences are the framing that if they're going to engage in doxing, why are they surprised that they got targeted with a dox? Especially after inserting themselves into something in a very public manner, while refusing to prove anything they (#KickVic) assert as true?

Eye for an eye was the first law, after all. The key difference is that they have things to hide for expedient purposes.
 
[cuck picture deleted]

edit: for context, Nick is covering Furie's copyright lawsuit against Alex Jones & InfoWars for using "Pepe" without his permission - albeit after he said publicly (when Pepe was first becoming a meme) that he doesn't mind if anyone wants to freely use Pepe. Commies are all about sharing, until someone they don't like comes along.

Important legal note: copyright transfers are only valid if in writing[*], so while it's pretty much a dick move, someone like Furie can say it's okay if you use his character and then turn around and sue you for it anyway. It would tend to defeat an argument of willful infringement if you reasonably believed you had permission, but it would not defeat the infringement claim itself.

Yeah I didn't know that. My posts were moved here just yesterday/today. My initial question was why Nick got his own thread and @AnOminous replied to me saying something about Matt Furie so i thought he was the reason Nick got this thread. Clarified now Thanks.

Some hot pocket cuck moved a bunch of posts here. You probably got a notification.

This happens sometimes because most of Nick's topics are things there are already threads on here, but then the stream goes off on a tangent and so does the thread.

The results are silly and kind of remind me of this Mr. Show sketch.


[*] And I think Furie actually said that online, i.e. in "writing," but it wasn't formally a license. In any event, I don't think the case is going to be thrown out since that kind of informal permission can be revoked at any time. Issues of estoppel or laches might come into play if the use were particularly lengthy or the defendant would be subjected to extreme unfairness as a result of having relied on such permission.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: cuddle striker
I loved how I could hear the confidence and wrath bubbling just beneath Em's surface when she spoke, but as she does so theres this lil dog in a raincoat bopping around on the screen. You'd be hard pressed to make this stuff up.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Burnout
Important legal note: copyright transfers are only valid if in writing[*], so while it's pretty much a dick move, someone like Furie can say it's okay if you use his character and then turn around and sue you for it anyway. It would tend to defeat an argument of willful infringement if you reasonably believed you had permission, but it would not defeat the infringement claim itself.



Some hot pocket cuck moved a bunch of posts here. You probably got a notification.

This happens sometimes because most of Nick's topics are things there are already threads on here, but then the stream goes off on a tangent and so does the thread.

The results are silly and kind of remind me of this Mr. Show sketch.


[*] And I think Furie actually said that online, i.e. in "writing," but it wasn't formally a license. In any event, I don't think the case is going to be thrown out since that kind of informal permission can be revoked at any time. Issues of estoppel or laches might come into play if the use were particularly lengthy or the defendant would be subjected to extreme unfairness as a result of having relied on such permission.

Do we have a thread on that particular lawsuit? i hadn't heard of it until today
 
Probably has to do with Assange. Australian politicians washed their hands of him as fast as possible to appease their masters of the US/UK.

If your serious, it's because Dick Masterson didn't get his Entertainment Visa approved in time to do the Live Show he scheduled in Melbourne, and isn't sure he'll be able to make it for one in Sydney next week.
 
Do we have a thread on that particular lawsuit? i hadn't heard of it until today

There have been a number of one-off threads but he somehow doesn't have his own lolcow thread despite being a huge lolcow and the creator of a Nazi icon, which makes him pretty much Hitler.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: damian
Back