Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
Shane (if that is him, post your chair for verification) has become so unhinged he's willing to sign up on a forum filled with doxing Nazis, according to Twitter.
723645
 
He's referring to people reaping the whirlwind after spending months ruining a man's life and reputation. I'm shocked that you didn't just run for the hills after being shown up so badly and instead doubled down on the stupidity.

Nah don't forget we've already been well informed how much Shane craves and requires attention. I mean would explain why he's decided to grace us with an apperance (pending verification)
 
Hi, Shane! Nice of you to come by. I will hold off believing the account is the real deal until there’s some proof, but evidently you read this thread anyways, so be sure to, in the case you aren’t registered, make an account and maybe hold an AMA. We’ll be genuinely delighted to have a chat.

Truth be told, up until this whole drama I had no fucking clue who Vic Minion-a is. I only really saw the new Brook movie, and that’s it, my exposure to Dragon Ball remained in the form of some choice select Super episodes and DBZA.
When I first heard of all this drama, I was somewhat neutral on the topic. People who abuse their position and popularity to prey upon unsuspecting people, let alone kids and teens, are scum and should be treated with ire, gassing and banishment to Hollywood. However, you can’t just right away trust heinous accusations of such a level. If you do that, if you trust that someone is a rapist without any evidence, you let this accusation become a powerful weapon that can be used freely, since consequences are at times minimal for the user.
And then I started seeing fun things, Shane. I saw a person on the group that reviewed Vic’s actions fake a SWATting attempt. I saw people like Monica Rial attacking her own fans who asked for proof. I saw #kickvic people turning every photo they could into OH HE HUG-RAPED THEM. I saw a certain YouTube channel edit a video into looking like Vic’s being creepy, and when the original surfaced, they deleted fucking everything. I saw a complete lack of actual evidence and not people saying they know victims.
I saw you, Shane, assuring everyone that you’re a friend to Vic, that you want the best for him. That’s why you want him to admit to crimes he haven’t committed unless proven so and to atone, and to apologize, and to disappear.
See, if we actually saw evidence that Vic Bologna is even one percent the creep your side portrays him as, chances are, you’d have some evil kiwifarms doxers on your side. And if he was actually the man you portray him as, the amount of support he’d have here would probably be minimal and the support would probably be firmly contained within edgelord posts and posts from accounts registered three hours ago.
Instead, all we see is a group of absolutely insane people dancing on the railway with EarPods in their listening holes, and no matter how much we’ll scream for them to get out of the way, they won’t notice the big fucking train until it is too late.

I just joined 20 minutes ago so I have no idea what AMA is. But if you have questions ask them. Or message me on Twitter or FB.

As for everything else, it is probably because the people actually calling the shots in the world or in this whole ordeal don't get on Twitter.
 
Oh for me being in this forum? Yeah no. There will be no legal repercussions in relation to the whole ordeal.
Confirmed for troll.

There's not really any precedent for the sheer volume of discovery that's been fed to counsel in preparation for this case. Discovery like that usually costs a LOT of money, a lot of man hours. The crowd sourced gigs of info that's been put in the hands of BHBH is unlike anything they've ever seen.
Everyone's head is on the line, and your writing style is off, anyway.
 
Last edited:
While I agree, he has tried awful hard to insert himself in the suit and Nick has dropped hints that he has paper coming.

He could sit down, shut up and maybe get deposed or he could double down and be sucked into the conspiracy and defamation causes.

Yeah I saw the civil conspiracy idea. Ludicrous. Especially since the ones he wants to say were part of it, had nothing really to do with anything lol.

Confirmed for troll.

There's not really any precedent for the sheer volume of discovery that's been fed to counsel in preparation for this case. Discovery like that usually costs a LOT of money, a lot of man hours. The crowd sourced gigs of info that's been put in the hands of BHBH is unlike anything they've ever seen.

Everyone's head is on the line, and your writing style is off, anyway.

You all are still basing a lawsuit off of tweets? Wow.
 
You all are still basing a lawsuit off of tweets? Wow.
Just in case anyone actually IS this stupid: Yes, you are responsible for things you say or do online. Especially if you expect to show up to court with clean hands.

In fact, had the people involved NOT taken to twitter, it would have been very hard to figure out who did what, and there wouldn't be a million eyes on it.

In other words: "They'd have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for those meddling tweets!"
 
Yeah I saw the civil conspiracy idea. Ludicrous. Especially since the ones he wants to say were part of it, had nothing really to do with anything lol.

It doesn’t matter if others had nothing to do with it. Civil conspiracy doesn’t require that.

Also, that’s what discovery is for.

You all are still basing a lawsuit off of tweets? Wow.

I mean, testimony is evidence, right, by your deduction? So, them admitting to conspiracy and malice on the Internet is admissible, right?

Also, Ty said he was keeping a thorough record of tortious interference with these people. Otherwise, these lawsuits would be out faster. So, it isn’t just “tweets”. In fact, this whole thing started with “tweets” and Internet shit.
 
It doesn’t matter if others had nothing to do with it. Civil conspiracy doesn’t require that.

Also, that’s what discovery is for.



I mean, testimony is evidence, right, by your deduction? So, them admitting to conspiracy and malice on the Internet is admissible, right?

Also, Ty said he was keeping a thorough record of tortious interference with these people. Otherwise, these lawsuits would be out faster. So, it isn’t just “tweets”. In fact, this whole thing started with “tweets” and Internet shit.


To win a civil conspiracy you have to prove one exists. That doesn't mean taking some random person and saying they were involved. Much like if he were to say you were involved, or me. Neither of us were, and there is no documentation of us being involved in that Funi ordeal because we were not. The Monica and Jamie thing is sort of the same thing. It is people taking and trying to figure out an entire case based off just 1 year when the whole thing started way before that and the people who he thinks were ringleaders were not really involved at all.
 
Back