Dr. Rachel McKinnon / Dr. Veronica Ivy / Rhys McKinnon / Rachel Veronica McKinnon / Foxy Moxy / SportIsARight - failed out of a tenured job,man who competes in womens sports, gained like 100 lbs in 2022 (page 813), comically fell off bike before a race (page 830)

You're all fools if you think that REEse will do anything but call this transphobic because endogenous testosterone doesn't matter and also muscles can't remember the testosterone in them

If genderqueer Jesus descended from the heavens, accompanied by the brave and stunning trans woman Virgin Mary and her transmasc husband St. Joseph and a host of enby angels, and they said to Rhys "my child, biologically male athletes have an unfair advantage in women's sports," Rhys would be on Twitter in a hot second calling them all lying transphobes.
 
Last edited:
I was curious about this, so I looked up Rhys' records USA cycling.
So it seems our guy has raced against penis havers before, as a "woman".

Please prepare yourself to be surprised (not really).

View attachment 724194

Our boy came in second against the menz. Notice, that the closest female was Kathleen O'Neil, in 7th.

There are other times he's done phenomenally bad too. I mean double the time of the top, so whatever dicking around he was doing in those races, who knows. But when he wins, he wins at men's times, not at female times.
Not GREAT men's times mind you, but men's times all the same. I'm sure it's easy to draw your own conclusions on why on earth that could possibly be.

It's worth pointing out that this graph is a measure of points and not race times. There are tonnes of races every year and the more you go to the more points you're going to get regardless and none of the professional bike riders I know who race (and I know people who have raced directly besides rhys in the same races before since I live in a competetive biking family) like no one especially in that age bracket has time to go to every race so they get less points no matter what since most people have real jobs. It's more a Guage of participation using points in my opinion. What I want to see is some actual race times compared to the men. they had a bracket in that spreadsheet for it but times were omitted.
 
Attention transphobic cis lesbians, unlike Rhys, I will be willing to take the L and have sex with you. I will even be willing to expand this offer to cis woman of all* types. It's the least I could do since you're all scientifically proven to be inferior at sports. Hooray for the male gender!

*no fatties
 
It's worth pointing out that this graph is a measure of points and not race times. There are tonnes of races every year and the more you go to the more points you're going to get regardless and none of the professional bike riders I know who race (and I know people who have raced directly besides rhys in the same races before since I live in a competetive biking family) like no one especially in that age bracket has time to go to every race so they get less points no matter what since most people have real jobs. It's more a Guage of participation using points in my opinion. What I want to see is some actual race times compared to the men. they had a bracket in that spreadsheet for it but times were omitted.

No, actually, that was for one "event" spread over a 3-4 day period and cat a and cat b were split up on times and prior ranking it seemed. The only women were in cat b. Including Rhys.
I don't have it up atm, but it wasn't a simple gotcha, I'm pretty sure that event created points based on times.

I did compare Rhys' times to actual men in another event, as I said - in TTs he was completing times comparative to b grade mens times or mid range 55+ years times. He was something like for example 56.03 vs the wmns times that were more 58/59+. Elite men were doing the race in the 36s I think. Ill s/s it again later, but his times were consistent unless he had an issue that race (ususally time trial runs) where his time was blown out to 100+ s.

EDIT :
These are from another event : The Marymoor Grand Prix from Jul20/Jul21 of 2018.
Rhys raced against Lizanne Wilmont. Lizanne is a Canadian/Australian rider, who has represented both countries in international events. She's an actual someone. An extremely good rider too. She's had to go where her riding takes her to be a professional. Lizanne is the only one who stood with him in the Time Trials.

725399


725400


Lizanne and Rhys' times were behind that of the top Over 50 Masters Mens times.
725403


Rhys isn't a life long professional in this field, so I don't expect his times even as a male to be up to par, but his times are that of mid range masters, like I said above and professional, country repping females.

You might also notice "KYO ZERO MARS" mentioned on there. Kyo Zero Mars is, prepare to be shocked - another fucking troon.
"Zero" as he likes to be known, hasn't been active for very long, I believe he started in 2017 and hasn't competed much.

If the mood takes you, https://www.tnwcteam.com/about/ go here. There's a whole litany of failed men who's names and manmugs you can check out.
 
Last edited:
After a year of painstaking research, human testing and at no doubt a high cost we've finally confirmed that men are better than women at sport.
That's why troons are a social cost. The general public has to foot the bills for the consequence of their sexual fetishes.

Now that we have people in the know about pro cycling here, can they tell us where the "UCI Master Tracks Cycling World Championship", the award that Rhys gloats over, comes in the grand scheme of things?

Rhys's response to the ePath paper:
725560

The sample size may be small but the findings have high statistical significance, definitely justifying further study.

In an ironic twist, Rhys laments with a genuine women because the historic Paris-Roubaix race is exclusive for men:
725548

You aren't excluded Rhys; you just stand no chance among your fellow men.

The fact that Kathleen Stock is deemed wrongthink in any "peer reviewed" Philosophy journal bespeaks how much of a joke academia has become:
725551


Yet on the other hand, Philosophy departments leave it up to charlatans like Rhys to teach students how they should write papers:
725555

Rule No.1 in writing a paper - insert pages of personal anecdotes and justify them as "secondary material used for description and illustration". If you change the names no one will know the paper is your blog in disguise!

Match of Intellectual Titans:
725546
 
Kathleen Stock's article can be read here. In my opinion, it's a long, but well worth reading article which does a good job discussing the ideological turmoils in the debate and explaining the dangers of gender self ID legislation.

In other words, it's only natural for REEEEEEs and his troon pals to dislike it
 

Lisa T. Mullin is just as much of a liar as Rhys. Either that, or she got a few paragraphs into Stock's essay, realized it was full of words with multiple syllables, and gave up and summarized the article she imagined Stock would write.

Let's go through Mullin's summary point by point.

1. No legal gender change should be allowed ever for trans people.

This is Mullin’s biggest, boldest lie. Stock very explicitly endorses legal gender change for trans people, albeit with two caveats:
  • Only trans people who have been diagnosed with dysphoria and undergone medical transition should be able to legally change gender. Legal gender change should not be predicated on self ID alone.
  • Trans people should not expect society at large to treat the legal fiction of gender change as a literal truth. So, for example, a trans woman should not point to the F on her passport to justify her entry in a women's bike race. (Lookin’ at you, Rhys.) Being legally female is not the same thing as being biologically female.
2. Society should be built on “biological truths” about men and women.

Stock does not say this, nor does she at any point use the phrase “biological truths.” Mullin is disingenuously implying that Stock is a biological determinist who believes that it is the natural order of things for men to make decisions and women to make babies. Needless to say, Stock, a staunch feminist, believes nothing of the sort. What she does believe is that women (read: adult human females) are harmed by the pretense that biological sex does not exist, as are homosexuals of both sexes.

3. Non-binary people should not be allowed to exist.

Stock says very little about non-binary people. She briefly mentions Scotland's creation of a legal third-gender category; although she does not believe that this category should be used for the purpose of recording census data, it is unclear whether or not she believes non-binary should be recognized as a legal category in other contexts. Even if we suppose that Stock opposes the existence of non-binary as a legal category tout court, it does not follow that she believes that “non-binary people should not be allowed to exist.” Many identitarian categories exist socially but not legally. There is no reason that the law should register furries as the species of their choice or treat people who claim to have DID as multiple entities inhabiting a shared body; however, these people are still perfectly free to exist and play pretend with anyone willing to humor them. The same goes for non-binaries.

Rhys is an egregious know-it-all and is usually quick to jump in with corrections whenever the opportunity presents itself; it's interesting that he's not doing so here. Either he hasn't actually read the article or he's letting Mullin do his lying for him and manfully holding back the “well, ackshually . . .
 
Last edited:
Rhys is going to "fox you up"!
726091


726092

I dunno, the Civil War was more than 150 years ago; society has moved on.
Also back then there were no trannies; men who thought themselves as women were treated as demonic possession.

Rhys is an egregious know-it-all and is usually quick to jump in with corrections whenever the opportunity presents itself
Rhys is also dissimulating when he said that Stock can't get published in peer-reviewed journals. That particular article is not written in an academic style and is not meant for an academic audience!

Also Rhys has said he has stopped submitting papers for anonymous review. What gives him the authority to tell students how to write?!

There are more Lisa Mullin's "critique" of Stock that Rhys did not retweet:
726094


726100

Let me guess, you're going to "fox them up"?
 
Rhys is going to "fox you up"!
View attachment 726091

View attachment 726092
I dunno, the Civil War was more than 150 years ago; society has moved on.
Also back then there were no trannies; men who thought themselves as women were treated as demonic possession.


Rhys is also dissimulating when he said that Stock can't get published in peer-reviewed journals. That particular article is not written in an academic style and is not meant for an academic audience!

Also Rhys has said he has stopped submitting papers for anonymous review. What gives him the authority to tell students how to write?!

There are more Lisa Mullin's "critique" of Stock that Rhys did not retweet:
View attachment 726094

View attachment 726100
Let me guess, you're going to "fox them up"?

"Lisa" seems hung up on the intersex thing. I think he actually thinks that being intersex = being an AGP.

726251


726252
:story: He's also Australian.

The problem with "Lisa's" obsession with intersex, is that it is rare. Very rare. It's something you cannot self diagnose. You absolutely cannot. It's not something you can self-identify with either. It's a genuine set of provable conditions.
So yet again, we have another birthright male sliding into the DMs of yet another reality they have no right to.

If he were genuinely intersex, he wouldn't be so obsessed with being Trans.
 
The whole "non-binary people aren't allowed to exist" thing is manipulative and dramatic language. Those people exist, the label of non-binary is just meaningless.

If I say I don't believe in vampires, I am not saying the people who think they are vampires don't exist. I just think they are are misguided and delusional. Their existence as people is irrefutable however.
 
The whole "non-binary people aren't allowed to exist" thing is manipulative and dramatic language. Those people exist, the label of non-binary is just meaningless.

If I say I don't believe in vampires, I am not saying the people who think they are vampires don't exist. I just think they are are misguided and delusional. Their existence as people is irrefutable however.

It's a kind of dehumanization-by-proxy: ordinary criticism or disagreement is framed as dehumanization, in order to justify why those offering it are the real monsters.
 
The whole "non-binary people aren't allowed to exist" thing is manipulative and dramatic language. Those people exist, the label of non-binary is just meaningless.

If I say I don't believe in vampires, I am not saying the people who think they are vampires don't exist. I just think they are are misguided and delusional. Their existence as people is irrefutable however.

Thing being, if it were true that would be awesome. I'd love to be able to have someone evaporate just because I don't believe their self-identification has any merit.

I wish it were true. But no, as you point out, it's just highly manipulative language used to catastrophise any disagreement as equivalent to sending them to the gas chambers.
 
Is that a stock drawing?

This is a terrible drawing. Did Rachel " totally not a furry" mckinnon draw this? it looks like a cartoon fox is rubbing its ass on the front of the shirt. Even the text placement is bad.


He chose one of the worst poses, too. The first thing I thought of was lordosis.
 
I hate the word "influencer"
727302


From the article:
These athletes, coaches, and yogis are a middle finger to the oppressively homogenous wellness world.

Rachel, a professor of philosophy and world-champion cyclist, rides under the tenets of the International Olympic Committee’s fourth fundamental principle: “The practice of sport is a human right." While advocating for trans inclusion, Rachel points out that “the range of differences within a sex category are much larger than the differences between sex categories.” For those who argue that trans athletes have an unfair advantage, she likes to point out that, since trans athletes were officially allowed to participate in the Olympics in 2004, none have qualified to do so, not even after the policy was relaxed in 2015.

727311

You don't need to abolish slavery to have "former slaves"; a slave could have escaped, released, or bought his freedom and becomes a "former slave".
Philosophers are really dumb on worldly affairs.

Criticizing another whitie is so woke:
727312


Good job @TheWokeLittlePuppy! Can you source these too?
727309


727310


Christa Peterson is drugged up on adderall. Surprises nobody:
727313


Going cold turkey on addictive medication did strange things to her mentality (re: fire at Paris Notre Dame).
727317
 
Back