Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

[Immortal Technique]

"Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, after seeing this you'll KNOW why we had to fire him. Advert your eyes if necessary."

 

[LeBeerus James]

So this is Soye's ace.
View attachment 727971
Going to be fun to read his deposition in a few months.

We have all the evidence in the world and could end it now, but we prefer to go to court and waste thousands of dollars.

 

[Captain Manning]

The chair and the bean commensurate with one another.

This timeline is wild.

 

[The Wisdom of Bassets]

So this is Soye's ace.
View attachment 727971
Going to be fun to read his deposition in a few months.

Twitter, Facebook and Tumblr have utterly convinced a ridiculous number of people that it's a law unto itself and the ONLY law that matters. As I said the other day, we NEED to reopen mental institutions and warehouse these people. They cannot be rehabed and there are not enough cult level deprogrammers on the planet to begin addressing the madness.

 

[Dopey Cunt]

We have all the evidence in the world and could end it now, but we prefer to go to court and waste thousands of dollars.

In retard language that roughly translates to: "We have no proof, we're just a bunch of dumb cunts."

 

[The Wisdom of Bassets]

The chair and the bean commensurate with one another.

This timeline is wild.

View attachment 727976

Dear God I love the internet.

 

[quickthrowaway]

So this is Soye's ace.
View attachment 727971
Going to be fun to read his deposition in a few months.

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

 

[In Heaven]

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

This might come as a shock, but Ron's not exactly bright.

 

[beardium]

The chair and the bean commensurate with one another.

This timeline is wild.

View attachment 727976

Still a better love story in the making than twilight.

 

[Questioning_Huggers]

The chair and the bean commensurate with one another.

This timeline is wild.

View attachment 727976

This entire fucking case feels like a wacky Monty Python's Flying Circus episode tbh, everything is that over the top and outrageous and stupid and seems to come out of nowhere.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

A CHALLENGER APPEARS!

View attachment 727966

Aaaaaaaaaannnnnnd blocked.

View attachment 727967

https://twitter.com/JellyBeanLaw

Stop that. Monica's personal FBI agent's sanity is about to give out.

 

[The Wisdom of Bassets]

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

Not sure that is the case from what Nick described the other night. It depends on who is testifying under oath.

 

[TenMilesWide]

What in the-

Testimony alone is not sufficient enough proof. There needs to be EVIDENCE. ACTUAL, FACTUAL EVIDENCE. Police reports or videos.

He's still going. He actually believes a bunch of randos coming forward with made up testimonies will be enough for the court. This is so exceptional, truly. I am blessed.

It's really funny watching the gears move, seeing the mental leaps they make in real time. I think somebody posted a screenshot from PULL a few hundred pages back where they were talking about how testimony under oath is considered evidence, which is why they want to parade out all of vic's victims whenever it goes to court. But then they make the leap that since testimony under oath is evidence, all testimony is evidence. Therefore the victims' accounts, even before going to court, are evidence.

Then you realize that none of them have actually come forward with a specific testimony, just "uh yeah one time, can't tell ya when or where, vic touched me inappropriately. No, I'm not going to elaborate. #believewomen" and so now it's not testimony under oath, or even just testimony, it's the existence of somebody who could potentially testify. That's their hard evidence. This proves vic is a sexual harasser and so none of what they've said is defamation anymore, nor did it interfere with vic's existing or potential contracts. Checkmate internet lawyers.

It's just stunning.

 

[Recoil]

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

And lo, Null begat the Farms and consequences loomed large forevermore.

 

[Questioning_Huggers]

Not sure that is the case from what Nick described the other night. It depends on who is testifying under oath.

Depends on how credible that witness seems to the jury.

 

[beardium]

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

Not sure that is the case from what Nick described the other night. It depends on who is testifying under oath.

I think he wants to emphasize that its easy to tell a lie on twitter but when you have to take an oath...i am pretty sure all of those 15 liars willing to testify would run away.

 

[BoxofMonkeys]

The chair and the bean commensurate with one another.

This timeline is wild.

View attachment 727976

Please tell me Rons fifi will not be making an appearance.

 

[Vampy]

Testimony under oath is proof. Gossiping on the internet is not proof because there are no consequences if you're lying. Why is this is so hard to understand.

He is probably convinced that everyone who spinned the rumor mill will come forward and testify under oath that this is all legitimate.
Or, you know, he is a liar.

 

[Dopey Cunt]

It's really funny watching the gears move, seeing the mental leaps they make in real time. I think somebody posted a screenshot from PULL a few hundred pages back where they were talking about how testimony under oath is considered evidence, which is why they want to parade out all of vic's victims whenever it goes to court. But then they make the leap that since testimony under oath is evidence, all testimony is evidence. Therefore the victims' accounts, even before going to court, are evidence.

Then you realize that none of them have actually come forward with a specific testimony, just "uh yeah one time, can't tell ya when or where, vic touched me inappropriately. No, I'm not going to elaborate. #believewomen" and so now it's not testimony under oath, or even just testimony, it's the existence of somebody who could potentially testify. That's their hard evidence. This proves vic is a sexual harasser and so none of what they've said is defamation anymore. Checkmate internet lawyers.

It's just stunning.

I think I remember Jamie Marchi getting caught saying they actually knew nobody who would testify and that she HOPED that someone would either get victimized or volunteer themselves to put their neck on the chopping block to make up a fake testimony to save their asses.

You know because lying under oath doesn't carry any consequences at all. Oh wait, I forgot these speds actually believe all their made up bullshit. That has to count for something, right?

RIGHT?

 

[The Wisdom of Bassets]

Depends on how credible that witness seems to the jury.

IIRC, Vic saying "Nope" is considered proof as he is the accused. The Woke crowd/accuser then has to provide actual evidence and their word isn't that evidence. Video, police reports etc would be that evidence.