- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
Not everyone said 90%, even Nate Silver said it was closer to 30% for a Trump win. Nate Silver also caught flak for this but he was easily the most reasonable on this.Honestly can't see where you're getting this from. I made $4k on Trump because I recognized horrible methodology in the state polling. The fact is, there is very little money in honest polling - most of those companies couldn't keep afloat. Consequently, the vast majority of polling organizations have an agenda.
If the state polling was so good, why did EVERYONE say that muh 90%+ chance of Clinton? The people that make those predictions are not so brain-dead that they just look at national polling.
Also, yes, polling firms can and do have biases. But, they still are pretty close to election results so even if they are biased they still seem to work.
What flaw did you see in state polling that gave you confidence though?