Culture Being An "Affluent Homeless" Is Becoming Popular. - Owning as little as possible and using other people's stuff is emerging as the answer to the millennial's economy.

tl:dr = The new hip thing is to own nothing except an IphoneX and a Macbook Pro, have a P.O. box and leech, borrow, co-share everything else. Because the NEW economy is instagram posts and experiences.




More young people are leaning into the rental or sharing economy — owning less of everything and renting and sharing a whole lot more. Housing, cars, music, workspaces. In some places, such as Los Angeles, this rental life has gone to an extreme.

Steven T. Johnson, 27, works in social media advertising and lives in Hollywood. He spends most of his days using things he does not own.
He takes a ride-share service to get to the gym; he does not own a car. At the gym, he rents a locker. He uses the gym's laundry service because he does not own a washing machine.

Johnson doesn't even have an apartment, actually. He rents a bed in a large room with other people who rent beds, for nights, weeks or months at a time, through a service called PodShare. All the residents share a kitchen and bathrooms. Johnson also rents a desk at WeWork, a coworking space.

And he says the only clothes he owns are two versions of the same outfit.

Johnson says he owns so little that he has even been able to get rid of his backpack. "I gave that up two months ago," he says.

He says that for him, this lifestyle isn't cumbersome or confusing. "That's what's great," he says. "When you don't own things, you don't have to keep track of them. You just show up."

He's part of a newish group of young people. He is educated and owns his own business. He could be considered well off, but he is also, in a way, homeless. By choice.

There are two big reasons for this shift: the price of housing and student loan debt. A little more than a third of millennials currently own homes, a rate lower than Generation X and baby boomers when they were the same age.

But is there something else going on as well? Does Johnson represent a fundamental shift in American capitalism as we know it?

Skyler Wang, a Ph.D. student at the University of California, Berkeley who studies the sharing economy, says even if young people own less and are less enamored with ownership than their parents may be, they still have a lot of stuff — it's just not tangible.

"I talked to a lot of minimalists," Wang says. "They're the type of people who love to couch-surf. They own like 30 things, but ... they hoard digitally. They have tons of photographs. They have thousands and thousands of Instagram posts."

They still live in an economy of stuff — it's just different stuff. It's experiences.

How do businesses deal with this? For starters, a lot more companies are getting into rentals. Even Ikea is starting to lease its furniture.

The outdoor chain REI announced recently it is vastly expanding its rental program for things like camping gear. Eric Artz, acting CEO of the company, says this requires a different kind of outreach.

"We're selling joy," he says. "We're selling inspiration when you get out on a trail or go for a bike ride. We're selling the adrenaline buzz at the end of a run, and we're just trying to enable that in any way we possibly can."

Juliet Schor, a sociologist at Boston College who studies the rental and sharing economies, says not everyone is in it for the same reasons. Some are doing it just for enjoyment. Some are doing it to move toward transactions that are less corporate and more personal. Others are willing to spend more for convenience.

But a lot rent and share because they're broke and they need to save money.

"I think it's a mistake to characterize them ... with one kind of economic orientation or orientation to money," Schor says.

That makes it really hard to predict whether renting and sharing is our long-term future, or just a fad — even for Johnson, who is totally plugged in to a rental life.

"It's not something that you can do forever, because you do need to have a place that you can genuinely point to and say, this is my home," he says.
 
This appears to be a thinly veiled propaganda piece for socialism.

Also lol :
“He says that for him, this lifestyle isn't cumbersome or confusing. "That's what's great," he says. "When you don't own things, you don't have to keep track of them. You just show up."”
Oh, so you’re just a lazy sack of shit? Got it.
 
"Gawd, my experiences are so much better than someone's who has their experiences attached to physical objects, they just don't understand!"

There are two big reasons for this shift: the price of housing and student loan debt. A little more than a third of millennials currently own homes, a rate lower than Generation X and baby boomers when they were the same age.
Yup. And why is that? I couldn't possible imagine a reason why a doubled workforce would not be able to afford stuff (and paying off debt) as much as they used to. A doubled workforce that is also more and more inclined not to bother to mingle horizontally because it's potential economic suicide for either one.

Economy's trending towards unwashed hipster hobos and I feel fine.
 
Steven T. Johnson, 27, works in social media advertising and lives in Hollywood. He spends most of his days using things he does not own.
He takes a ride-share service to get to the gym; he does not own a car. At the gym, he rents a locker. He uses the gym's laundry service because he does not own a washing machine.

Johnson doesn't even have an apartment, actually. He rents a bed in a large room with other people who rent beds, for nights, weeks or months at a time, through a service called PodShare. All the residents share a kitchen and bathrooms. Johnson also rents a desk at WeWork, a coworking space.
The generation that doesn’t even have blockbuster is trying to claim the idea of renting things instead of buying them.
 
Now wait just a moment.

Hollywood is in California, right? In California, knowingly exposing others to HIV is now a misdemeanor instead of a felony. So you can use this "sharing" as cover-up to intentionally contaminate people's houses and infect the inhabitants by spreading your bodily fluids on their items of personal hygiene or through other means.

California? Looks more like the Land of Poz, if you ask me! Something tells me the only state to be quarantined in the future will be California and not Florida.
 
That would be my guess too, even factoring things like parking costs and repairs.

Either ride-shares are cheaper than I'm thinking or parking is more expensive than I'm thinking.
I suppose that depends on where you park - and live. In Australia most parking spaces are free, since they're usually owned by the council.
 
Well nowadays you can "rent" an electric car that remote-shutdowns if the manufacturer disagrees with your opinion, so I think they're probably worthy of the title of rental kings.
Do elaborate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToroidalBoat
The idea that you're saving money by long-term renting more and more stuff is silly. Your money doesn't disappear when you buy a car - it's converted into the car. Even taking into account the depreciation of that asset, you are far better off in the long term than renting a car whenever you need it, or taking ubers everywhere. Same goes for a washing machine, or whatever else.

Well nowadays you can "rent" an electric car that remote-shutdowns if the manufacturer disagrees with your opinion, so I think they're probably worthy of the title of rental kings.

This will increasingly become a realistic concern. A future where private ownership of things effectively ceases to exist, is a future where your access to anything can be taken away in an instant.
 
The idea that you're saving money by long-term renting more and more stuff is silly. Your money doesn't disappear when you buy a car - it's converted into the car. Even taking into account the depreciation of that asset, you are far better off in the long term than renting a car whenever you need it, or taking ubers everywhere. Same goes for a washing machine, or whatever else.
I've heard of Twitch streamers spending $50-100 a day on delivery from companies like Door Dash because pizza is too unhealthy and they don't have time to buy groceries or learn how to cook. The delivery fees are like $10-15. I balk at the $2 fee my local place charges when I'm feeling lazy. These aren't small timers either, but they aren't millionares like the biggest names. They don't see anything wrong with this because they don't see their life ever changing. They have no concept of investing whether it be in assets or themselves.
 
Back