EU Le Gilets Jaune protests thread - Do you hear the people sing? Singing the songs of angry men?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46233560

One protester has died and dozens were injured as almost a quarter of a million people took to the streets of France, angry at rising fuel prices.

The female protester who died was struck after a driver surrounded by demonstrators panicked and accelerated.

The "yellow vests", so-called after the high-visibility jackets they are required to carry in their cars, blocked motorways and roundabouts.

They accuse President Emmanuel Macron of abandoning "the little people".

Mr Macron has not so far commented on the protests, some of which have seen demonstrators call for him to resign.

But he admitted earlier in the week that he had not "really managed to reconcile the French people with their leaders".

Nonetheless, he accused his political opponents of hijacking the movement in order to block his reform programme.

What has happened so far?
Some 244,000 people took part in protests across France, the interior ministry said in its latest update.

It said 106 people were injured during the day, five seriously, with 52 people arrested.

Most of the protests have been taking place without incident although several of the injuries came when drivers tried to force their way through protesters.

_104382445_mediaitem104380864.jpg
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionA driver forces a car through a group of protesters in Donges, western France
Chantal Mazet, 63, was killed in the south-eastern Savoy region when a driver who was taking her daughter to hospital panicked at being blocked by about 50 demonstrators, who were striking the roof of her vehicle, and drove into them.

The driver has been taken into police custody in a state of shock.

In Paris protesters approaching the Élysée Palace, the president's official residence, were repelled with tear gas.

Why are drivers on the warpath?
The price of diesel, the most commonly used fuel in French cars, has risen by around 23% over the past 12 months to an average of €1.51 (£1.32; $1.71) per litre, its highest point since the early 2000s, AFP news agency reports.

World oil prices did rise before falling back again but the Macron government raised its hydrocarbon tax this year by 7.6 cents per litre on diesel and 3.9 cents on petrol, as part of a campaign for cleaner cars and fuel.

_104382673_050666846-1.jpg
Image copyrightEPA
Image captionTear gas was used to disperse protesters in Paris
The decision to impose a further increase of 6.5 cents on diesel and 2.9 cents on petrol on 1 January 2019 was seen as the final straw.

Speaking on Wednesday, the president blamed world oil prices for three-quarters of the price rise. He also said more tax on fossil fuels was needed to fund renewable energy investments.

How big is the movement?
It has broad support. Nearly three-quarters of respondents to a poll by the Elabe institute backed the Yellow Vests and 70% wanted the government to reverse the fuel tax hikes.

More than half of French people who voted for Mr Macron support the protests, Elabe's Vincent Thibault told AFP.

_104382449_mediaitem104382448.jpg
Image copyrightREUTERS
Image captionPolice attend as protesters block a motorway in Antibes
"The expectations and discontent over spending power are fairly broad, it's not just something that concerns rural France or the lower classes," he said.

The BBC's Lucy Williamson in Paris says the movement has grown via social media into a broad and public criticism of Mr Macron's economic policies.

Are opposition politicians involved?
They have certainly tried to tap into it. Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who was defeated by Mr Macron in the second round of the presidential election, has been encouraging it on Twitter.

She said: "The government shouldn't be afraid of French people who come to express their revolt and do it in a peaceful fashion."

Image Copyright @MLP_officiel@MLP_OFFICIEL
Report
_97415642_007_in_numbers_624.png

Laurent Wauquiez, leader of the centre-right Republicans, called on the Macron government to scrap the next planned increase in carbon tax on fossil fuels in January to offset rising vehicle fuel prices.

Mr Castaner has described Saturday's action as a "political protest with the Republicans behind it".

Olivier Faure, leader of the left-wing Socialist Party said the movement - which has no single leader and is not linked to any trade union - had been "born outside political parties".

"People want politicians to listen to them and respond. Their demand is to have purchasing power and financial justice," he said.

Image Copyright @faureolivier@FAUREOLIVIER
Report
_97415642_007_in_numbers_624.png

Is there any room for compromise?
On Wednesday, the government announced action to help poor families pay their energy and transport bills.

Prime Minister Edouard Philippe announced that 5.6 million households would receive energy subsidies. Currently 3.6 million receive them.

A state scrappage bonus on polluting vehicles would also be doubled for France's poorest families, he said, and fuel tax credits would be brought in for people who depend on their cars for work.

Protesters have mocked the president relentlessly as "Micron" or "Macaron" (Macaroon) or simply Manu, the short form of Emmanuel, which he famously scolded a student for using.

Image Copyright @BBCWorld@BBCWORLD
Report

To be honest, I don't blame the driver at all.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Unog
one utube channel was drawing a parallel between Zelensky elected in Ukraine and Macron, basically saying that Macron got elected on a populist, unrealistic platform. In essence the claim was that he promised larger pieces of pie without any idea how to make the pie bigger. I haven't paid much attention during the election in France, can some French kiwis chime in?

My personal interest is figuring out if Macron is just populist dumbass or he trully is connected to some powerful figures in the shadows. If former true, we may see similar things happen in Ukraine, on a similar timeline.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Unog
one utube channel was drawing a parallel between Zelensky elected in Ukraine and Macron, basically saying that Macron got elected on a populist, unrealistic platform. In essence the claim was that he promised larger pieces of pie without any idea how to make the pie bigger. I haven't paid much attention during the election in France, can some French kiwis chime in?

My personal interest is figuring out if Macron is just populist dumbass or he trully is connected to some powerful figures in the shadows. If former true, we may see similar things happen in Ukraine, on a similar timeline.
He was an investment banker for the Rothschild bank for a while, and went to some French school that is known for turning out high profile government workers and other high profile careers; basically a finishing school for rich and famous jerkoffs who are born with a silver spoon up their ass. I know @Azovka could give more detail on this. Point is he's a poster boy and puppet for the EU and other bankers and it couldn't be more clear. All you have to do is go back barely 2 years now and look at how the mainstream media in Europe and the US was gushing over him and his victory over Le Pen.
 
Last edited:
Oh yes, they were absolutely orgasmic that Europe had "rejected populism and racism" by electing the Pretty-boy who was already being declared leader of the Free World (tm) since Drumpf getting elected meant the US was DQ'd from world politics forevermore...... and how France had dodged a bullet by electing the RIGHT kind of leader!

And it promptly went to shit and has been a year-long street riot.
 
My personal interest is figuring out if Macron is just populist dumbass or he trully is connected to some powerful figures in the shadows. If former true, we may see similar things happen in Ukraine, on a similar timeline.

From what I've gotten from it is Macron ran on being a centrist who would come in and bring both sides together, balance things out and not be massively pro-EU nor massive left or right wing populist and be pragmatic. Instead he turned out to be even more pro-EU than anyone imagined, kowtowing to Germany, and started pushing for more taxes that are in line with EU policy, and ignoring actual problems like immigration. What seems to make it even worse is he either dismisses those concerns or completely ignores that the country is a festering hellhole and goes on lavish international meetings and vacations like everything is fine.

The fact he married his highschool teacher who is old enough to be his mom should have been a hint that there's something very not right with him.
 
It's almost like as though when a politician runs on being the Centrist, that's usually code that they are an unprincipled walking amalgamation of everything that makes both the left and right wing parties shitty as opposed to having whatever beneficial qualities either side is known for
 
one utube channel was drawing a parallel between Zelensky elected in Ukraine and Macron, basically saying that Macron got elected on a populist, unrealistic platform. In essence the claim was that he promised larger pieces of pie without any idea how to make the pie bigger. I haven't paid much attention during the election in France, can some French kiwis chime in?

My personal interest is figuring out if Macron is just populist dumbass or he trully is connected to some powerful figures in the shadows. If former true, we may see similar things happen in Ukraine, on a similar timeline.
He was an investment banker for the Rothschild bank for a while, and went to some French school that is known for turning out high profile government workers and other high profile careers; basically a finishing school for rich and famous jerkoffs who are born with a silver spoon up their ass. I know @Azovka could give more detail on this. Point is he's a poster boy and puppet for the EU and other bankers and it couldn't be more clear. All you have to do is go back barely 2 years now and look at how the mainstream media in Europe and the US was gushing over him and his victory over Le Pen.

Hi, yes, I think I can shed some light on Macron's rise to power. It's gonna be a bit lengthy and detailed, so I'll hide it in the spoiler below.

Okay so, our story starts in Northern France, where little Macron was a student at the Lycée La Providence, which is a nation-level famous private Catholic school for wealthy and well-connected kids.
The connections part cannot be understated. Most things in France come with social networking. Simply having money isn't enough. For wealthy kids whose parents are from "new money" or don't know anyone worthy of knowing, there's other money-sink schools like EAB in Paris or the boarding school Les Roches, whose graduates aren't as, how to put it, respected? in French society.

Anyways, little Macron lucked out in having his future waifu as his French teacher at 15. As some of his classmates recall, she took a bit too much of a shine to little Macron, and constantly praised him, read his essays and poems out loud to the class, and urged other students to be more like him. Macron often stayed after class to "talk about literature" with her and, at 15 years old, the relationship turned sexual.

His parents having learned about it later down the line, they instantly transferred little Macron to the Lycée Henri IV in Paris, my own alma matter. It is a public school consistently being ranked among the best of France, and most importantly, it counts among its alumni the sons and daughters of prominent French politicians, businessmen, engineers etc. Hell, the first thing you hear from the headmaster's 'welcome' address at the start of the year is "you are the elite (French expression: "crème de la crème", meaning "the cream of the cream", "top of the pyramid", whatever). Act like it".

And the Lycée Henri IV only accepts 4-5 students tops per year unless it's for Grade 1. So the fact that Macron got in in grade 12 (Terminale in French, last high school year) means that his parents knew people. On top of Macron having himself a brilliant resume.
Just to put things into perspective, H4 gets about 4000 candidatures per year, and all of these are from what you would consider to be good students. I mean, if you visit on an "open doors" day, the headmaster and councillors themselves will tell you "don't bother applying unless you got an average over 16/20, which for France is quite high. So getting selected yourself out of 4000 equally good and deserving students? You or your family needs to know people that would put in a good word for you, and make your dossier stand out.

So yeah, as @Keystone put it, it's a "a finishing school for rich and famous jerkoffs who are born with a silver spoon up their ass."
I mean personally, while my dossier was, without bragging, quite good and I got rewarded at the Concours Général in History (National Contest, a prize for excellence basically), the only reason I got into H4 was because my former headmaster and friend of the family knew the Prefect of Paris - think Minister of the Interior for the city of Paris, who knew the headmaster of Henri IV. Nepotism at its finest. And I sincerely doubt Macron's case was any different.

Anyways, having finished high school at H4, Macron pursued his studies in "prépas", which are the French answer to selective universities.
You see, here universities are forced to accept anyone as long as they have their high school diploma, no matter the grade. The process of undergraduate admission to university is completely available to everyone, and the real selection comes after the First Year, where only about 12-15% of the class pass on (widely depends on the fields, but about 3/4 of the students in every discipline either quit or are forced to repeat a year).

So how do good and intelligent students get the recognition and respect they deserve? They go to "prépas", which are pretty much a continuation of high school - 2 years of 8AM to 6PM classes 5 days per week with 4 hours of mandatory written exams on Saturday morning, and oral exams in the afternoon. All that to prepare you for the "Great Schools" country-wide contest. They're called Grandes Ecoles (Great Schools) and encompass everything from business (HEC, ESSEC, ESCP) to engineering (I'X, ENSI, Centrale) to administration / arts (ENS) to physics, biology etc.

Basically, you spend 2 years of your life labouring day and night and forgoing all social life in order to have a chance at getting in a Great School for four years, and get a Graduate (Masters) diploma at the end of it. But that's all prépas give you - a chance. And Macron failed. Twice, actually. (The usual student policy when you "fail" aka don't get the school you desire at the end of your second year is just to repeat it and try again. It's a pretty common practice. And so, after repeating his 2nd year, Macron failed again).

So Macron decided to change his orientation a bit and went to Science Po (the Paris Institute of Political Science) to do a joint degree with the Nanterre University there, majoring in Philosophy. During his stay here, he interned under a very famous French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, that further connected him with people in the publishing / media world.

After that, he got accepted to the ENA (National Administration School) that is literally known for making Presidents and government officials. Basically, if you get in there, that's it - end of the line; you're set for life.

Following his graduation from the ENA, he started working for the Rothschild investment bank, which is something I personally think is really funny considering he majored in fucking Philosophy. (Keep in mind that a background in mathematics, economy, and finance is rather preferred when applying as a, you know, investment banker).
Anyways, he interned in the US, made his first million in his first year of work, and stayed a valuable asset of the Rothschild group until suddenly going for politics (initially going for the French Socialist Party - PS, now known as "New Left", and then making his own centre-left party called En Marche (LREM)).

Okay, now that I summed up his biography, or what is known at least, time for some theories and remarks.

First, Macron isn't a populist. In fact, he ran on an ANTI-populist platform, opposing the very populist, far-right figure Marine Le Pen. Hell, he didn't even have a list of ideas on how to make the country better.

People weren't so much voting "for" him as "against" Le Pen, since she was way too extreme and hardcore. That's literally the reason he won.

Just for the record, he even stole his promotional campaign ad from Bernie Sanders of all people. Here's a YT link of a French TV channel laughing at him for it. Funnily enough, Macron prefaced his campaign clip by saying he wanted to rule "in a sincere, authentic, and true manner". And then you just got stolen images from US campaigns. Very authentic indeed.


Anyways, people knew he was a rich, well-connected, elitist banker, and a poster boy for the French bourgeoisie, but they voted for him nonetheless because the alternative was way worse (and I say that as a rather conservative-leaning person myself - Marine Le Pen is just way too extreme).

Also an important thing to note is that, there were other candidates that were going for President before Macron even showed up on the political scene, namely Hamon for Socialists (US Democrats equivalent) and Fillon for Republicans (right party). Hamon was way too "left" for most of the French people - making marijuana legal, free money for everyone etc. and not very popular, and the actual prized stallion of the upcoming Presidential race was Fillon.

Only right before the election, it suddenly turned out that Fillon had made up a fake job for his wife within his political party years before. And so a criminal procedure was opened up against him, and he had to retire from the race.

I'm not saying Fillon wasn't guilty. All politicians are, and nepotism is a standard practice. But the fact that it just suddenly happened to be uncovered right before the Presidential election, allowing Macron to step in straight outta nowhere and save the "moderate" France, is really fishy.

The only thing he really has in common with Zelensky is his connection to oligarchs or "powerful figures in the shadows" as you would say.

The theory I personally subscribe to, along with many French people, is that his higher-ups at Rothschild just told him to go into politics to promote their interests and those of corporations there. I mean, he's a charismatic young man sweeping in to save France and "change the establishment" when he himself is literally it.
Hell, Macron even made a former Nestlé executive, famous having promoted the benefits of palm oil and denying climate change to the post of Minister of the Environment / Ecology. Like please.

Another thing it would be a shame to omit is that Brigitte - Macron's current wife and former French teacher, remember from when he was 15? Well, she kept in touch with him during his formative years, despite his family's opposition. And funnily enough, she tried (unsuccessfully) going into politics herself as early as 1989.

Personally I don't think it was just a coincidence. For all we know, she could have influenced and guided Macron, and led him to fulfil her own unrealised expectations of political greatness.

So yeah, Macron isn't some random dude from the street or comedian with no political experience. His entire life and career prepared him for that, right from the cradle. He is the very definition of "political establishment", just like so many Presidents before him.

The only thing he got going on for him were his looks, his "youthful dynamism" as the French media would put it, and the fact that it was either him or worse (though now I think most people do regret not voting Le Pen).

Also, a shit ton of young, barely legal, wealthy "bourgeois socialists" hailed him as a national hero, motivated by his empty speeches, stolen campaign clips, and cult of personality.
But just because his speeches were all smokes and mirrors, doesn't mean Macron himself didn't have a plan. He did alright, and everything he did since he got sworn in has been for the benefit of corporations and rich Frenchmen, for better or worse.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
So Macron said he would be giving some tax cuts to the people by closing some corporate loopholes and tax evasion,

e45a4ef0f0ae0a3ca9b67188078975e2a78b453dda73565223f669ccd68e6722.jpg
Now that is an atrocious photoshop work. Real numbers are 63% unconvinced and 37% convinced, which is pretty bad already, no need to overdo it.

Hi, yes, I think I can shed some light on Macron's rise to power. It's gonna be a bit lengthy and detailed, so I'll hide it in the spoiler below.

Okay so, our story starts in Northern France, where little Macron was a student at the Lycée La Providence, which is a nation-level famous private Catholic school for wealthy and well-connected kids.
The connections part cannot be understated. Most things in France come with social networking. Simply having money isn't enough. For wealthy kids whose parents are from "new money" or don't know anyone worthy of knowing, there's other money-sink schools like EAB in Paris or the boarding school Les Roches, whose graduates aren't as, how to put it, respected? in French society.

Anyways, little Macron lucked out in having his future waifu as his French teacher at 15. As some of his classmates recall, she took a bit too much of a shine to little Macron, and constantly praised him, read his essays and poems out loud to the class, and urged other students to be more like him. Macron often stayed after class to "talk about literature" with her and, at 15 years old, the relationship turned sexual.

His parents having learned about it later down the line, they instantly transferred little Macron to the Lycée Henri IV in Paris, my own alma matter. It is a public school consistently being ranked among the best of France, and most importantly, it counts among its alumni the sons and daughters of prominent French politicians, businessmen, engineers etc. Hell, the first thing you hear from the headmaster's 'welcome' address at the start of the year is "you are the elite (French expression: "crème de la crème", meaning "the cream of the cream", "top of the pyramid", whatever). Act like it".

And the Lycée Henri IV only accepts 4-5 students tops per year unless it's for Grade 1. So the fact that Macron got in in grade 12 (Terminale in French, last high school year) means that his parents knew people. On top of Macron having himself a brilliant resume.
Just to put things into perspective, H4 gets about 4000 candidatures per year, and all of these are from what you would consider to be good students. I mean, if you visit on an "open doors" day, the headmaster and councillors themselves will tell you "don't bother applying unless you got an average over 16/20, which for France is quite high. So getting selected yourself out of 4000 equally good and deserving students? You or your family needs to know people that would put in a good word for you, and make your dossier stand out.

So yeah, as @Keystone put it, it's a "a finishing school for rich and famous jerkoffs who are born with a silver spoon up their ass."
I mean personally, while my dossier was, without bragging, quite good and I got rewarded at the Concours Général in History (National Contest, a prize for excellence basically), the only reason I got into H4 was because my former headmaster and friend of the family knew the Prefect of Paris - think Minister of the Interior for the city of Paris, who knew the headmaster of Henri IV. Nepotism at its finest. And I sincerely doubt Macron's case was any different.

Anyways, having finished high school at H4, Macron pursued his studies in "prépas", which are the French answer to selective universities.
You see, here universities are forced to accept anyone as long as they have their high school diploma, no matter the grade. The process of undergraduate admission to university is completely available to everyone, and the real selection comes after the First Year, where only about 12-15% of the class pass on (widely depends on the fields, but about 3/4 of the students in every discipline either quit or are forced to repeat a year).

So how do good and intelligent students get the recognition and respect they deserve? They go to "prépas", which are pretty much a continuation of high school - 2 years of 8AM to 6PM classes 5 days per week with 4 hours of mandatory written exams on Saturday morning, and oral exams in the afternoon. All that to prepare you for the "Great Schools" country-wide contest. They're called Grandes Ecoles (Great Schools) and encompass everything from business (HEC, ESSEC, ESCP) to engineering (I'X, ENSI, Centrale) to administration / arts (ENS) to physics, biology etc.

Basically, you spend 2 years of your life labouring day and night and forgoing all social life in order to have a chance at getting in a Great School for four years, and get a Graduate (Masters) diploma at the end of it. But that's all prépas give you - a chance. And Macron failed. Twice, actually. (The usual student policy when you "fail" aka don't get the school you desire at the end of your second year is just to repeat it and try again. It's a pretty common practice. And so, after repeating his 2nd year, Macron failed again).

So Macron decided to change his orientation a bit and went to Science Po (the Paris Institute of Political Science) to do a joint degree with the Nanterre University there, majoring in Philosophy. During his stay here, he interned under a very famous French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, that further connected him with people in the publishing / media world.

After that, he got accepted to the ENA (National Administration School) that is literally known for making Presidents and government officials. Basically, if you get in there, that's it - end of the line; you're set for life.

Following his graduation from the ENA, he started working for the Rothschild investment bank, which is something I personally think is really funny considering he majored in fucking Philosophy. (Keep in mind that a background in mathematics, economy, and finance is rather preferred when applying as a, you know, investment banker).
Anyways, he interned in the US, made his first million in his first year of work, and stayed a valuable asset of the Rothschild group until suddenly going for politics (initially going for the French Socialist Party - PS, now known as "New Left", and then making his own centre-left party called En Marche (LREM)).

Okay, now that I summed up his biography, or what is known at least, time for some theories and remarks.

First, Macron isn't a populist. In fact, he ran on an ANTI-populist platform, opposing the very populist, far-right figure Marine Le Pen. Hell, he didn't even have a list of ideas on how to make the country better.

People weren't so much voting "for" him as "against" Le Pen, since she was way too extreme and hardcore. That's literally the reason he won.

Just for the record, he even stole his promotional campaign ad from Bernie Sanders of all people. Here's a YT link of a French TV channel laughing at him for it. Funnily enough, Macron prefaced his campaign clip by saying he wanted to rule "in a sincere, authentic, and true manner". And then you just got stolen images from US campaigns. Very authentic indeed.


Anyways, people knew he was a rich, well-connected, elitist banker, and a poster boy for the French bourgeoisie, but they voted for him nonetheless because the alternative was way worse (and I say that as a rather conservative-leaning person myself - Marine Le Pen is just way too extreme).

Also an important thing to note is that, there were other candidates that were going for President before Macron even showed up on the political scene, namely Hamon for Socialists (US Democrats equivalent) and Fillon for Republicans (right party). Hamon was way too "left" for most of the French people - making marijuana legal, free money for everyone etc. and not very popular, and the actual prized stallion of the upcoming Presidential race was Fillon.

Only right before the election, it suddenly turned out that Fillon had made up a fake job for his wife within his political party years before. And so a criminal procedure was opened up against him, and he had to retire from the race.

I'm not saying Fillon wasn't guilty. All politicians are, and nepotism is a standard practice. But the fact that it just suddenly happened to be uncovered right before the Presidential election, allowing Macron to step in straight outta nowhere and save the "moderate" France, is really fishy.

The only thing he really has in common with Zelensky is his connection to oligarchs or "powerful figures in the shadows" as you would say.

The theory I personally subscribe to, along with many French people, is that his higher-ups at Rothschild just told him to go into politics to promote their interests and those of corporations there. I mean, he's a charismatic young man sweeping in to save France and "change the establishment" when he himself is literally it.
Hell, Macron even made a former Nestlé executive, famous having promoted the benefits of palm oil and denying climate change to the post of Minister of the Environment / Ecology. Like please.

Another thing it would be a shame to omit is that Brigitte - Macron's current wife and former French teacher, remember from when he was 15? Well, she kept in touch with him during his formative years, despite his family's opposition. And funnily enough, she tried (unsuccessfully) going into politics herself as early as 1989.

Personally I don't think it was just a coincidence. For all we know, she could have influenced and guided Macron, and led him to fulfil her own unrealised expectations of political greatness.

So yeah, Macron isn't some random dude from the street or comedian with no political experience. His entire life and career prepared him for that, right from the cradle. He is the very definition of "political establishment", just like so many Presidents before him.

The only thing he got going on for him were his looks, his "youthful dynamism" as the French media would put it, and the fact that it was either him or worse (though now I think most people do regret not voting Le Pen).

Also, a shit ton of young, barely legal, wealthy "bourgeois socialists" hailed him as a national hero, motivated by his empty speeches, stolen campaign clips, and cult of personality.
But just because his speeches were all smokes and mirrors, doesn't mean Macron himself didn't have a plan. He did alright, and everything he did since he got sworn in has been for the benefit of corporations and rich Frenchmen, for better or worse.
This is a good summary, worth a read if you want to get more familiar with Macron backstory.
I would only like to add a few more things :

  • First, his wife was really instrumental to his rise to power and especially for him to create the right connections. Right now the top selling book in France is "Crepuscule" by Juan Branco which try to expose the mechanisms behind it, especially how Macron got coopted by french elites. Prolly wondering how a french teacher like Brigitte Macron could have so much connections, simple : family wealth and connections and she herself was teaching to the poshest of the poshest (not only La Providence but also parisian private high schools, where she connected with the wealthiest (in particular Arnault and Niel who is married to Arnault's daughter)
  • Then you have to take into account the high market concentration in french media, most of them (90%ish) owned by the very same wealthiest, who tbf do not practice censorship but are pretty close (promoting/demoting people instead of straight up deleting articles). You had shit like that, hilarious in retrospect, where he was presented as a great philosopher, great pianist, finance genius, etc... . This is how someone with his background could get so good of a covering.
  • Finally, he played a key role in big M&A when he was working in IB, like the sell of Alstom to GE, where he basically bypassed the Minister of Economy at the time by getting a second, more inclined to the sale, audit from an american firm without telling him, the privatization of Toulouse airport, the sale of Le Monde, the sale of SFR. There might be others I do not even know, but they all fit the same pattern and it is not tryinf to help the masses, but it sure helped him getting in the good grace of the right persons.
 
Part of today's protest is outside some French media company's building:

That journalist who got yeeted by the riot cops last week is back despite them telling him to stay away:

Going to some parliament building in Strasbourg. As you might expect, the tear gas was primed and ready when they got there.

They're not fans of motorcycle cops
 
Oh shit, the EU Parliament building there?
A parliament building there. I dunno if it's The parliament building for France.

The cops blocked a bridge to the building. "Hon hon hon, you shall not pass"

Another independent journo got BEGONE'd allegedly

What a dick
 
Hi, yes, I think I can shed some light on Macron's rise to power. It's gonna be a bit lengthy and detailed, so I'll hide it in the spoiler below.

Okay so, our story starts in Northern France, where little Macron was a student at the Lycée La Providence, which is a nation-level famous private Catholic school for wealthy and well-connected kids.
The connections part cannot be understated. Most things in France come with social networking. Simply having money isn't enough. For wealthy kids whose parents are from "new money" or don't know anyone worthy of knowing, there's other money-sink schools like EAB in Paris or the boarding school Les Roches, whose graduates aren't as, how to put it, respected? in French society.

Anyways, little Macron lucked out in having his future waifu as his French teacher at 15. As some of his classmates recall, she took a bit too much of a shine to little Macron, and constantly praised him, read his essays and poems out loud to the class, and urged other students to be more like him. Macron often stayed after class to "talk about literature" with her and, at 15 years old, the relationship turned sexual.

His parents having learned about it later down the line, they instantly transferred little Macron to the Lycée Henri IV in Paris, my own alma matter. It is a public school consistently being ranked among the best of France, and most importantly, it counts among its alumni the sons and daughters of prominent French politicians, businessmen, engineers etc. Hell, the first thing you hear from the headmaster's 'welcome' address at the start of the year is "you are the elite (French expression: "crème de la crème", meaning "the cream of the cream", "top of the pyramid", whatever). Act like it".

And the Lycée Henri IV only accepts 4-5 students tops per year unless it's for Grade 1. So the fact that Macron got in in grade 12 (Terminale in French, last high school year) means that his parents knew people. On top of Macron having himself a brilliant resume.
Just to put things into perspective, H4 gets about 4000 candidatures per year, and all of these are from what you would consider to be good students. I mean, if you visit on an "open doors" day, the headmaster and councillors themselves will tell you "don't bother applying unless you got an average over 16/20, which for France is quite high. So getting selected yourself out of 4000 equally good and deserving students? You or your family needs to know people that would put in a good word for you, and make your dossier stand out.

So yeah, as @Keystone put it, it's a "a finishing school for rich and famous jerkoffs who are born with a silver spoon up their ass."
I mean personally, while my dossier was, without bragging, quite good and I got rewarded at the Concours Général in History (National Contest, a prize for excellence basically), the only reason I got into H4 was because my former headmaster and friend of the family knew the Prefect of Paris - think Minister of the Interior for the city of Paris, who knew the headmaster of Henri IV. Nepotism at its finest. And I sincerely doubt Macron's case was any different.

Anyways, having finished high school at H4, Macron pursued his studies in "prépas", which are the French answer to selective universities.
You see, here universities are forced to accept anyone as long as they have their high school diploma, no matter the grade. The process of undergraduate admission to university is completely available to everyone, and the real selection comes after the First Year, where only about 12-15% of the class pass on (widely depends on the fields, but about 3/4 of the students in every discipline either quit or are forced to repeat a year).

So how do good and intelligent students get the recognition and respect they deserve? They go to "prépas", which are pretty much a continuation of high school - 2 years of 8AM to 6PM classes 5 days per week with 4 hours of mandatory written exams on Saturday morning, and oral exams in the afternoon. All that to prepare you for the "Great Schools" country-wide contest. They're called Grandes Ecoles (Great Schools) and encompass everything from business (HEC, ESSEC, ESCP) to engineering (I'X, ENSI, Centrale) to administration / arts (ENS) to physics, biology etc.

Basically, you spend 2 years of your life labouring day and night and forgoing all social life in order to have a chance at getting in a Great School for four years, and get a Graduate (Masters) diploma at the end of it. But that's all prépas give you - a chance. And Macron failed. Twice, actually. (The usual student policy when you "fail" aka don't get the school you desire at the end of your second year is just to repeat it and try again. It's a pretty common practice. And so, after repeating his 2nd year, Macron failed again).

So Macron decided to change his orientation a bit and went to Science Po (the Paris Institute of Political Science) to do a joint degree with the Nanterre University there, majoring in Philosophy. During his stay here, he interned under a very famous French philosopher Paul Ricoeur, that further connected him with people in the publishing / media world.

After that, he got accepted to the ENA (National Administration School) that is literally known for making Presidents and government officials. Basically, if you get in there, that's it - end of the line; you're set for life.

Following his graduation from the ENA, he started working for the Rothschild investment bank, which is something I personally think is really funny considering he majored in fucking Philosophy. (Keep in mind that a background in mathematics, economy, and finance is rather preferred when applying as a, you know, investment banker).
Anyways, he interned in the US, made his first million in his first year of work, and stayed a valuable asset of the Rothschild group until suddenly going for politics (initially going for the French Socialist Party - PS, now known as "New Left", and then making his own centre-left party called En Marche (LREM)).

Okay, now that I summed up his biography, or what is known at least, time for some theories and remarks.

First, Macron isn't a populist. In fact, he ran on an ANTI-populist platform, opposing the very populist, far-right figure Marine Le Pen. Hell, he didn't even have a list of ideas on how to make the country better.

People weren't so much voting "for" him as "against" Le Pen, since she was way too extreme and hardcore. That's literally the reason he won.

Just for the record, he even stole his promotional campaign ad from Bernie Sanders of all people. Here's a YT link of a French TV channel laughing at him for it. Funnily enough, Macron prefaced his campaign clip by saying he wanted to rule "in a sincere, authentic, and true manner". And then you just got stolen images from US campaigns. Very authentic indeed.


Anyways, people knew he was a rich, well-connected, elitist banker, and a poster boy for the French bourgeoisie, but they voted for him nonetheless because the alternative was way worse (and I say that as a rather conservative-leaning person myself - Marine Le Pen is just way too extreme).

Also an important thing to note is that, there were other candidates that were going for President before Macron even showed up on the political scene, namely Hamon for Socialists (US Democrats equivalent) and Fillon for Republicans (right party). Hamon was way too "left" for most of the French people - making marijuana legal, free money for everyone etc. and not very popular, and the actual prized stallion of the upcoming Presidential race was Fillon.

Only right before the election, it suddenly turned out that Fillon had made up a fake job for his wife within his political party years before. And so a criminal procedure was opened up against him, and he had to retire from the race.

I'm not saying Fillon wasn't guilty. All politicians are, and nepotism is a standard practice. But the fact that it just suddenly happened to be uncovered right before the Presidential election, allowing Macron to step in straight outta nowhere and save the "moderate" France, is really fishy.

The only thing he really has in common with Zelensky is his connection to oligarchs or "powerful figures in the shadows" as you would say.

The theory I personally subscribe to, along with many French people, is that his higher-ups at Rothschild just told him to go into politics to promote their interests and those of corporations there. I mean, he's a charismatic young man sweeping in to save France and "change the establishment" when he himself is literally it.
Hell, Macron even made a former Nestlé executive, famous having promoted the benefits of palm oil and denying climate change to the post of Minister of the Environment / Ecology. Like please.

Another thing it would be a shame to omit is that Brigitte - Macron's current wife and former French teacher, remember from when he was 15? Well, she kept in touch with him during his formative years, despite his family's opposition. And funnily enough, she tried (unsuccessfully) going into politics herself as early as 1989.

Personally I don't think it was just a coincidence. For all we know, she could have influenced and guided Macron, and led him to fulfil her own unrealised expectations of political greatness.

So yeah, Macron isn't some random dude from the street or comedian with no political experience. His entire life and career prepared him for that, right from the cradle. He is the very definition of "political establishment", just like so many Presidents before him.

The only thing he got going on for him were his looks, his "youthful dynamism" as the French media would put it, and the fact that it was either him or worse (though now I think most people do regret not voting Le Pen).

Also, a shit ton of young, barely legal, wealthy "bourgeois socialists" hailed him as a national hero, motivated by his empty speeches, stolen campaign clips, and cult of personality.
But just because his speeches were all smokes and mirrors, doesn't mean Macron himself didn't have a plan. He did alright, and everything he did since he got sworn in has been for the benefit of corporations and rich Frenchmen, for better or worse.
Thank you for that. Well written. It's fucked up that we here at the farms are actually doing real journalism while laughing at cows and calling niggers niggers, and troons pedos. ChrisChan created a beast.

A bunch of autists like us make the MSM look like /b or ED on whippets.

If Yang becomes president ever, @Null needs to cash in his social credit bux. Rich for life.

On topic: I think, in retrospect, Le Pen wouldn't have been a bad option considering this clusterfuck. It's not like the French elect tyrants. Nobody would have put up with shit if it had been too egregious.
 
On topic: I think, in retrospect, Le Pen wouldn't have been a bad option considering this clusterfuck. It's not like the French elect tyrants. Nobody would have put up with shit if it had been too egregious.

While Marine Le Pen’s anti-EU policy resonates with more and more French people atm, she burned a lot of her credibility and good will with the electorate ages ago.

Basically she herself comes from an established far-right political family, her father Jean-Marie Le Pen having reached the second turn of the 2002 Presidential elections himself.
And while she herself is less “extreme” than her father, she’s very famous for not preparing for interviews or public appearances, not writing her speeches, and generally not knowing what the fuck she’s talking about. That alone ruins a lot of her credibility.

It’s one thing for Trump to not know the numbers and wing it, but Marine Le Pen has very little of his forcefulness and charisma.
 
While Marine Le Pen’s anti-EU policy resonates with more and more French people atm, she burned a lot of her credibility and good will with the electorate ages ago.

She dropped her anti-european project tho, to get loans from french banks. She's not different from any of the others in this aspect, only in it for the money.
 
She dropped her anti-european project tho, to get loans from french banks. She's not different from any of the others in this aspect, only in it for the money.
So she's basically the French Ann Coulter where everyone thinks she's the Fem!Goebbels but the truth is she changes her principles at the drop of a hat if it benefits her and her pocketbook?
 
Back