- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
No, you still have to prove damages.
The presumption of damages in per se defamation just applies to trying to get the case dismissed for lack of damages. It isn't a guarantee of free money.
Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.
- Thread starter 5t3n0g0ph3r
- Start date
No, you still have to prove damages.
The presumption of damages in per se defamation just applies to trying to get the case dismissed for lack of damages. It isn't a guarantee of free money.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Okay, but still... "how much is the life of the man we just destroyed really worth, your honor?" can't be a good look, especially after not even bothering to respond to the complaint.
wickedlilium
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2019
could be wrong on how it works but
In this case he can prove damages via dropped cons and Funi so it would be easy enough to get a ball park amount due to that, and that would be before both tortuous interference are added on, and then we have the conspiracy charges that would need to be factor in, so if it's money wise you are looking at well over 1mill+ in total dmg's.
U
UY 690
Guest
kiwifarms.net
If Froppy loses her case? Edward would beat her ass in the fight of the court of law.
Couldn't find a crossover fanart with Edward and Froppy so this will do for now.
Couldn't find a crossover fanart with Edward and Froppy so this will do for now.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
I know it's almost definitely not going that route, but how fucking terrified do MoRon (and their lawyer) have to be of discovery that they'd risk defaulting rather than face it.
Edit: Ok, new docs. Lets take a look.
Def. Original Answer... So they're claiming that "for years" "women nationwide" have claimed he's sexually harassed them. Of course, they don't mention this is the same 5 people repeating themselves on Livejournal and Tumblr over and over again because he refused to sign their gay incest child porn.
Claiming he's a public figure.
Using the term victim instead of "alleged victims," because MoRon is a skumfuck with a skumfuck lawyer.
"Vic's predatory tendencies are well documented," and literally cites the existence of Tumblr harassment blogs as proof that he's guilty. Are these idiots really trying to try the case in their response? Oh, and cites the Google doc file created by that Emily Rose twat. Guess what Em, hope you like depositions, because I bet you get one now.
"For some reason (ignore the 400 pages of defamation) Vic is suing MoRon."
"Vic wants to drag this into the PUBLIC." Holy fuck, I'm out. I can't finish this without some alcohol.
Edit2: Hahaha, Oh shit. Marchi dodged process. Did she just not answer the door? Is that why she's been radio silent, she doesn't want anyone to know where she's at?? Does this affect her case in any way??
Edit: Ok, new docs. Lets take a look.
Def. Original Answer... So they're claiming that "for years" "women nationwide" have claimed he's sexually harassed them. Of course, they don't mention this is the same 5 people repeating themselves on Livejournal and Tumblr over and over again because he refused to sign their gay incest child porn.
Claiming he's a public figure.
Using the term victim instead of "alleged victims," because MoRon is a skumfuck with a skumfuck lawyer.
"Vic's predatory tendencies are well documented," and literally cites the existence of Tumblr harassment blogs as proof that he's guilty. Are these idiots really trying to try the case in their response? Oh, and cites the Google doc file created by that Emily Rose twat. Guess what Em, hope you like depositions, because I bet you get one now.
"For some reason (ignore the 400 pages of defamation) Vic is suing MoRon."
"Vic wants to drag this into the PUBLIC." Holy fuck, I'm out. I can't finish this without some alcohol.
Edit2: Hahaha, Oh shit. Marchi dodged process. Did she just not answer the door? Is that why she's been radio silent, she doesn't want anyone to know where she's at?? Does this affect her case in any way??
Last edited:
Love Soze
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2018
These citations are hilarious.
This is how sad their case is. Jesus.
This is how sad their case is. Jesus.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Wow? Did Ron Write that himself? Are they actully presenting or arguing that instances of the defamation are proof of the plaintiffs wrongdoing? They are honest to god using "everybody knows it, its on the internet!" As their defense?
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
Are we sure Landau didn't change his name and start up a new law firm in Texas? I said in another thread I didn't think Casey was incompetent but I'd like to object to my own stupid ass statement now.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Yes. That's literally their defense. "People have been gossiping about this for 15 years, therefore, it must be true."
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
per the god emperor himself
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
The response literally reads like a fucking tumblr blog! That is spectacular. Did they secretly hire Shane?
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2017
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
My state follows Federal style pleading about 99% of the time, so this kind of pleading in the Answer seems very strange to me. I'm used to pretty bland numbered paragraphs admitting or denying the claims in the Complaint until you get to your counterclaims.
I don't know if Texas has pleading rules that let you just kind of do free form shit-talking.
I don't know if Texas has pleading rules that let you just kind of do free form shit-talking.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Maybe they tried to save money writing it themselves and just hired the guy for a couple hours to file it. Not beyond the realm of stupidity.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
Allege facts on a single, specific incedent you stupid cucks. It’ll at least buy some time. This tells me that they either have less than nothing or they really do thing the legal system works like fucking twitter.
pearlslam
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
Is Ron Toye serious about this answer? Is this worthy of a motion to strike (if you were a judge and the opposing attorney)?
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
I've seen that before and it's hilarious. Especially when the lawyer doesn't even bother to fix the paragraph numbering or the fonts.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
This shit right here is mind boggling. These dipshits run around for months, years even, defaming and lynch-mobbing a man online on any social media platform they can find; and they have the gall to pretend that he is the one that was doing this to them after the public sees through their bullshit. Jesus these people have no shame.