Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Zero Day Defense said:
Hey, now, the KJV is great, if only for liturgical use. It could be so much worse-- she could have used The Message, or even the AMP which just injects Evangelical doctrine in its parentheses as if they're truly "expanding" the meaning of the verses, overall making for a clunky and unreadable mess.
Click to expand...

Of course there are worse ones out there, and I actually like the semi-archaic language.

However I think a translation should be direct from original-to-translated language. Not original-to-intermediate-to-final. Not, as the case of King James, original-to-Latin-to-English. There's so much potential for fuckups or lost meaning when you double translate.

I mean just look how much clearer Marchi's verse is in other translations: "If a man’s testicles are crushed or his penis is cut off, he may not be admitted to the assembly of the LORD."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: not william stenchever, Questioning_Huggers and ConSluttant
GethN7 said:
Not only can we assume she made a threat concerning his life and safety, we can only assume if that's what she wants, he's still got all of his private bits intact and she wishes to change that, therefore her quotation is not only using the word of God as a weapon, but it'[s also inaccurate concerning Vic at present.

tl;dr: She played herself with a contradiction.
Click to expand...
I also find it a little odd that she'd quote a religious text when she's one of the people who hates Vic for his religious and political beliefs. It's like she's trying to use the Bible to insult him and ISWV in some fruity attempt to throw ironic shade at Christians or something. Of course, in her usual infintile edgelord manner, it comes across as super baity and I bet she was just sitting there in the darkness of her home, staring at her phone, waiting for someone to respond so she can pounce on them to deliver one of her edgy retorts.

Funny enough, looking back at the threads, it seems she's the one getting baited.
Comical.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: not william stenchever, AStupidMonkey and Clockwork Dragon
Monkey Prick said:
I'm reading their response and I just can't get over how fucking bad it is, it literally reads like it was written by PULL or MoRon themselves. It's less a response and more of a telling of their own head canon so far. They actually use tumblr blogs to prove their points. They even have the gall to claim that Vic has attempted to demonize both Rial and Marchi and claim that Vic's petition fails to identify what defamatory or tortious conduct the defendants are liable for.

I'm no lawyer but this looks like a joke, how long is that last statemet going to hold water when they're onto slide 300 of the tweets?
Click to expand...

I found footage of how this all went down

 
  • Like
Reactions: not william stenchever, BlueSpark, Questioning_Huggers and 1 other person
Slab Bulkhead said:
So, with the revelation of some TI evidence between Ron and Kamehacon, with actual text messages, how long until PULL starts losing their shit and denying them as fake news?
Click to expand...

PULL nuked my only post and banned me in their thread crowing about how they were cited in Casey's legal argument, and how Nick is clearly jealous of it. They were upset because I cited a case of a former Army colonel who was accused of raping a fellow cadet at West Point in the 80s by the 'victim', who wrote a blog posting and cost him a promotion to brigadier general. (Source: https://www.armytimes.com/news/your...forced-to-pay-millions-in-defamation-damages/ )

Long story short they don't like that the courts can find you just as guilty as the person starting the defamation,but they think they're safe because "MUG FREEZE PEACH" or some shit.

Also they didn't like me mentioning that Hitler has been cited and mentioned in legal briefs and that makes PULL literally equivalent to Hitler, now.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Maraschino, Jub-Jub, Questioning_Huggers and 9 others
some_crazy said:
The OT is not irrelevant to modern christianity - though it does take some context and understanding.

That aside she was doing it in response to the below - she was basically trying to go tit for tat as AuldArchie was referencing her dodging service:

View attachment 758856


View attachment 758858
Click to expand...

That tweet seemed unusual, so I looked into it.

marchi.jpg


Hebrew school?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: The Decimator, ChevroletBlackboard, BlueSpark and 3 others
OneHandClapping said:
Looking at the original complaint:

January 16: DBSB releases.
January 17: Armzgurl makes #KickVic.
"Barely a week later" as per paragraph 18, Sony tells Vic they're investigating three claims against him.
January 29: Sony tells Vic he's terminated.
February 11: Funimation confirm their termination of Vic and imply it was because of harassment.
Click to expand...
What I still want to know is why funimation waited two weeks before announce his firing. Was it just so all the VAs could get their clout for throwing him under the bus.
 
Spectre_06 said:
PULL nuked my only post and banned me in their thread crowing about how they were cited in Casey's legal argument, and how Nick is clearly jealous of it. They were upset because I cited a case of a former Army colonel who was accused of raping a fellow cadet at West Point in the 80s by the 'victim', who wrote a blog posting and cost him a promotion to brigadier general. (Source: https://www.armytimes.com/news/your...forced-to-pay-millions-in-defamation-damages/ )
Click to expand...
The millions paid in damages to this guy and Vic's soon to be millions make me wonder if anyone will ever establish a legal fund for the victims of this MeToo bullshit and other false charges. A lot of people don't have the resources for a good lawyer like Ty. Seems like there's clearly interest and clearly a market for potential litigants. While the SJW crowd will screech (and this could easily go bad sometimes with actual rapists using it), ironically this would help a lot of their precious PoCs since you damn well know a lot of minority men are railroaded through the justice system.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Easy J, Questioning_Huggers, Yuusha-sama and 6 others
Save the Loli said:
The millions paid in damages to this guy and Vic's soon to be millions make me wonder if anyone will ever establish a legal fund for the victims of this MeToo bullshit and other false charges. A lot of people don't have the resources for a good lawyer like Ty. Seems like there's clearly interest and clearly a market for potential litigants. While the SJW crowd will screech (and this could easily go bad sometimes with actual rapists using it), ironically this would help a lot of their precious PoCs since you damn well know a lot of minority men are railroaded through the justice system.
Click to expand...

Don't take this as me supporting SJWs, but I think that this would be swinging the pendulum too far one way causing it to backfire. It doesn't solve the problem at all. I would push for a cheaper, more effective system of punishing people with false or unprovable claims. Imagine getting a 20k fine for making shit up that damages someone. It's fast and easy to resolve on top of catching a lot of people. This is for people who don't have chat logs, police reports, or whatever. Think of it like giving someone a ticket for speeding but way more expensive.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Irwin M. Felcher, Hotfartz :), Male Idiot and 3 others
Commander said:
Don't take this as me supporting SJWs, but I think that this would be swinging the pendulum too far one way causing it to backfire. It doesn't solve the problem at all. I would push for a cheaper, more effective system of punishing people with false or unprovable claims. Imagine getting a 20k fine for making shit up that damages someone. It's fast and easy to resolve on top of catching a lot of people. This is for people who don't have chat logs, police reports, or whatever. Think of it like giving someone a ticket for speeding but way more expensive.
Click to expand...

That would actually be a more effective deterrent in some ways.

It's easy to spew shit that defames someone, but hard to sue for it, so I propose a modified variant:

Let someone file a defamation claim on a statement, and until the statement can be assessed as defamatory or not, the party accused of defamation have to put so much money down on potential damages, like several thousand at least, and if it goes to trial, that gets tacked on to the amount they have to pay if they lose.

If they win, they don't pay it.

Either way, until they hit a courtroom, they already know they'll be down a nice chunk of change in advance unless they are willing to take it to court or they retract the statement.

If the latter is done before a court gets involved, then the matter is over and done with presuming it was done in a timely and reasonable manner.

Edit: Upon reflection, this would cause as many problems as it solves, but I can't think of better alternatives that would give pause to malicious actors at the moment.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Dislike
Reactions: Reigensveld, The Bright Lord, Bruton Gaster and 4 others
GethN7 said:
That would actually be a more effective deterrent in some ways.

It's easy to spew shit that defames someone, but hard to sue for it, so I propose a modified variant:

Let someone file a defamation claim on a statement, and until the statement can be assessed as defamatory or not, the party accused of defamation have to put so much money down on potential damages, like several thousand at least, and if it goes to trial, that gets tacked on to the amount they have to pay if they lose.

If they win, they don't pay it.

Either way, until they hit a courtroom, they already know they'll be down a nice chunk of change in advance unless they are willing to take it to court or they retract the statement.

If the latter is done before a court gets involved, then the matter is over and done with presuming it was done in a timely and reasonable manner.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you need an anti-SLAPP against the abuse of this system. Have the plantiff pay that same amount to the defense if defeated in anti-SLAPP
 
Medicated said:
Really what movie?

Well I was looking to see what school she actually went to, because it's not mentioned in her bio. Only her University. I was wondering if she went to a Christian School.
Click to expand...

For some reason I thought Marchi was a practicing Catholic? And possibly went to Catholic school?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back