Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
The one thing he brought is the Tom Wayland thing and then the alleged "research team" literally knows jack shit about it, whether it was civil, criminal, whether it even happened, where it happened, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LobotomizedFerret
Might as well ask this here since the topic was on editing and intros: In Nick's new(ish) intro, there's clips of Shane and another dude in a beanie. Who's he?
 
AnOminous said:
The one thing he brought is the Tom Wayland thing and then the alleged "research team" literally knows jack shit about it, whether it was civil, criminal, whether it even happened, where it happened, etc.
Click to expand...

For the record. His "research" team who is "amazing" pulled a case number off the original facebook page, called it a court case number and patted themselves on the back. I retract anything previously stated, this sperg needs to shush.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Shady Attorney and LobotomizedFerret
Soyboys just mad because nobody wants to pay attention to him. You can look back at his other videos on Nick's stream, he wants to gatekeep and be king of the weebs with only his opinion mattering.

He's another Mother's Basement.

Edit:
OneHandClapping said:
Might as well ask this here since the topic was on editing and intros: In Nick's new(ish) intro, there's clips of Shane and another dude in a beanie. Who's he?
Click to expand...
Andy Warski - check the Internet famous board.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Yuusha-sama, Dr. Dingo DVM, Zero Day Defense and 4 others
Jub-Jub said:
Soyboys just mad because nobody wants to pay attention to him. You can look back at his other videos on Nick's stream, he wants to gatekeep and be king of the weebs with only his opinion mattering.

He's another Mother's Basement.
Click to expand...
He calls himself AnimeOutsiders in order to separate himself from the anime community yet I don't see the difference. The spergary remains the same.
 
AnOminous said:
There are very good reasons not to actually prosecute many things as RICO that actually are RICOs. The pleading requirements are incredibly stringent and it takes a monster legal team even to draft the complaint for one. For another, it's a federal statute and this case belongs in state court. It's pleaded with parties and causes of action that more or less preclude federal removal, and that is a strategic choice.

Many states do have a state equivalent of RICO often called something like a "little RICO" statute, but I'm not sure if Texas is one of them.

These DMs and messages though do greatly help the causes of action actually pled, including civil conspiracy.

RICO is just one of those delicious things that are fun to recognize, that people tend to recognize overly much when they aren't there, it's a sexy cause of action on paper, but in reality it's never RICO.
Click to expand...

When I first looked up RICO to find out why it's never RICO after hearing that in a Legal Eagle video the go-to explanation was something like "it's not being an assassin who's paid to kill people, it's running a whole organisation of paid assassins"

So I instantly figured that if it takes being literally a batman villain (Ra's Al Ghul) to be an actually prosecuted RICO case, it's safe to say nobody would bother with it in a case like this where millions of dollars aren't flowing and nobody is dying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back