They can't get their heads around the facts that:
1. This is not a criminal trial. Vic won't be treated as a criminal and Monica and Jamie will definitely not be treated as "victims."
2. Vic isn't the accused here, he is the accuser. Again, he isn't on trial for the supposed "crimes" they believe he did. He is accusing Monica, Ron and Jamie of defamation, tortious interference (a big part of the lawsuit they often forget) and civil conspiracy.
3. Vic won't have to prove that he isn't a sexual predator or rapist or whatever. It's Monica, Ron and Jamie that will have to prove that he is. That's how defamation works. If they can't prove their claims of "100+ women" and "sexual assault", which is clearly defined as literal rape in Texas, they lose.
4. Muh "Defamation is a bitch to prove". Just parroting something they've read off google without giving any though into why it would be hard to prove. It's actually very easy to prove when you have text messages and public tweets. Because they were stupid and arrogant enough to defame him publicly for all the world to see.
4. They forget about the tortious interference part of the lawsuit most of the time. Ron's texts alone make the case for this, so he is already fucked, what remains is showing that Monica and Jamie too were complicit. And that's where the civil conspiracy part comes in. Hissrad even says that he's not familiar with the term, but then why should his opinion on the matter be considered more reliable than an actual lawyer's is beyond me.
