- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
I always wondered what happens if you take the rings off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do I even want to know why these people want abortion for those that physically can't get pregnant?View attachment 767046
Something she shared:
View attachment 767047View attachment 767048View attachment 767049View attachment 767050View attachment 767051View attachment 767052
Also, this was what the comments section looked like:
They're talking about transmen, they can get pregnant.Do I even want to know why these people want abortion for those that physically can't get pregnant?
Do I even want to know why these people want abortion for those that physically can't get pregnant?
I think its because Hispanics rank higher than east Asians on the progressive stack so she can take an Asian role.I just saw Alita Battle Angel over the weekend and I just realized the double standards in casting.
Scarlett Johansson is cast to play a cyborg"/robot in Ghost in the Shell. Many people from Japan don't give a damn but Americans and Asian-Americans are outraged because "muh whitewashing". 2-3 years after she is cast people still make jokes about Scarlett being a "woc".
Alita also features a cyborg/robot and is played by Rosa Salazar who is apparently of Peruvian descent (according to Wikipedia like 90% of Peru identifies as having partial or full Native American ancestry) and I don't remember ANY major backlash at her casting.
So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?
EDIT: This is what Rosa looks like.
View attachment 767223
All pee o' seas are exactly interchangeable.So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?
![]()
Social justice warriors are just getting started
The forthcoming young adult novel "Blood Heir" would not strike most readers as racist. Its Chinese author, Amélie Wen Zhao, was born in Paris and grew up in Beijing. Its fantastical plot — a princess with magic powers flees her father’s palace after his murder — draws inspiration from Russian…www.washingtonexaminer.com
I just saw Alita Battle Angel over the weekend and I just realized the double standards in casting.
Scarlett Johansson is cast to play a cyborg"/robot in Ghost in the Shell. Many people from Japan don't give a damn but Americans and Asian-Americans are outraged because "muh whitewashing". 2-3 years after she is cast people still make jokes about Scarlett being a "woc".
Alita also features a cyborg/robot and is played by Rosa Salazar who is apparently of Peruvian descent (according to Wikipedia like 90% of Peru identifies as having partial or full Native American ancestry) and I don't remember ANY major backlash at her casting.
So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?
EDIT: This is what Rosa looks like.
View attachment 767223
"Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.
It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only was serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
"Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.
Even when disregarding the funny misunderstandings their stupid language gymnastics could lead to, terms like "uterus havers" and "cervix havers" aren't necessarily inclusive of everybody either. A poor immigrant housekeeper from El Salvador who doesn't speak much English, hasn't had a day of sexual education in her life and is in need of an abortion because the man of the house impregnated her is more likely to understand the word "woman" than biologically specific language like "uterus haver" or "cervix haver". Complicated language is often needed in politics but there's really no reason to use unnecessarily convoluted terms in this case aside from pandering to triggered troons.It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
Their gambit is to debase people who think in terms of biological realities. They set up the term "uterus havers" simply to denounce it. This way they put the term "women", despite it having been enucleated of any meaning, to a privileged pedestal, the focus of all their discourse, hence allowing males to stick their fingers in what are exclusively female businesses.It's kind of funny, though; they screech about the "gender binary" as reducing people's identities to their genitals...but what is "uterus haver" but that?
It gets worse, they also use "birther" for pregnant women and "bleeder" for menstruating women like this is some losers dystopian novel."Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.
Even when disregarding the funny misunderstandings their stupid language gymnastics could lead to, terms like "uterus havers" and "cervix havers" aren't necessarily inclusive of everybody either. A poor immigrant housekeeper from El Salvador who doesn't speak much English, hasn't had a day of sexual education in her life and is in need of an abortion because the man of the house impregnated her is more likely to understand the word "woman" than biologically specific language like "uterus haver" or "cervix haver". Complicated language is often needed in politics but there's really no reason to use unnecessarily convoluted terms in this case aside from pandering to triggered troons.It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
Slavery in Russia was abolished in 1861.It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
Wait, the last time I heard that was from my gay cousin who acts like the bras in Woolworth's somehow oppress him.It gets worse, they also use "birther" for pregnant women and "bleeder" for menstruating women like this is some losers dystopian novel.