Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

9DE13569-9E8D-42A2-A871-3760DF30F6F5.png


Something she shared:

D375EABA-5675-4082-9FFB-1108A8567CF7.jpeg
82F37AB5-6D16-495A-AEE5-02D753B84EDF.jpeg
73966C46-734A-493E-92AE-481D1CE9C577.jpeg
7DD6E3F4-328D-467A-AE49-306ED358C3C0.jpeg
3FDACA67-6545-41EB-BBDE-05633AC13EE1.jpeg
4B005F08-138E-4718-88A0-80996BA35A11.jpeg


Also, this was what the comments section looked like:

500ED3CB-F450-465F-BE7C-B07C0CA7CC42.jpeg
64E5E142-645A-409B-9AA0-1CDEFC281E8D.jpeg
9D94A231-FF18-4C08-A6BD-410D201026CA.jpeg
8CAFB3AD-EBB0-4EA1-AA8F-EA4AE5C6D485.jpeg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JambledUpWords
I just saw Alita Battle Angel over the weekend and I just realized the double standards in casting.

Scarlett Johansson is cast to play a cyborg"/robot in Ghost in the Shell. Many people from Japan don't give a damn but Americans and Asian-Americans are outraged because "muh whitewashing". 2-3 years after she is cast people still make jokes about Scarlett being a "woc".

Alita also features a cyborg/robot and is played by Rosa Salazar who is apparently of Peruvian descent (according to Wikipedia like 90% of Peru identifies as having partial or full Native American ancestry) and I don't remember ANY major backlash at her casting.

So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?

EDIT: This is what Rosa looks like.
767223
 
Last edited:
I just saw Alita Battle Angel over the weekend and I just realized the double standards in casting.

Scarlett Johansson is cast to play a cyborg"/robot in Ghost in the Shell. Many people from Japan don't give a damn but Americans and Asian-Americans are outraged because "muh whitewashing". 2-3 years after she is cast people still make jokes about Scarlett being a "woc".

Alita also features a cyborg/robot and is played by Rosa Salazar who is apparently of Peruvian descent (according to Wikipedia like 90% of Peru identifies as having partial or full Native American ancestry) and I don't remember ANY major backlash at her casting.

So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?

EDIT: This is what Rosa looks like.
View attachment 767223
I think its because Hispanics rank higher than east Asians on the progressive stack so she can take an Asian role.
 
So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?
All pee o' seas are exactly interchangeable.
 
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FierceBrosnan


The idea that slavery is an inherently black narative is pretty amusing, seeing as the root of the word is slav.
 
I just saw Alita Battle Angel over the weekend and I just realized the double standards in casting.

Scarlett Johansson is cast to play a cyborg"/robot in Ghost in the Shell. Many people from Japan don't give a damn but Americans and Asian-Americans are outraged because "muh whitewashing". 2-3 years after she is cast people still make jokes about Scarlett being a "woc".

Alita also features a cyborg/robot and is played by Rosa Salazar who is apparently of Peruvian descent (according to Wikipedia like 90% of Peru identifies as having partial or full Native American ancestry) and I don't remember ANY major backlash at her casting.

So what gives? They're both playing cyborgs based on Japanese manga and neither actress is born in or has Japanese ancestry. But only one actress got such intense backlash and jokes made about her. Is it because Rosa is considered a "poc" while Scarlett isn't?

EDIT: This is what Rosa looks like.
View attachment 767223

Tim Goodman in Detective Pikachu (2016)
767870


Tim Goodman in Detective Pikachu (2019)
767871


As long as the actor lacks pale skin, they don't care about race accurate casting. It's like how they screech when non-LGBTIABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ play one of those characters (ScarJo got heat for that too) but are silent when one of those people play a normal person. All people are equal, but some are more equal than others.
 
I'm still confused by the fuss about Eddie Redmayne stealing a true and honest woman's part in the Danish girl.

How many ore surgery, pre hormonal tranny actors are out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: queue-anon
"Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.

Even when disregarding the funny misunderstandings their stupid language gymnastics could lead to, terms like "uterus havers" and "cervix havers" aren't necessarily inclusive of everybody either. A poor immigrant housekeeper from El Salvador who doesn't speak much English, hasn't had a day of sexual education in her life and is in need of an abortion because the man of the house impregnated her is more likely to understand the word "woman" than biologically specific language like "uterus haver" or "cervix haver". Complicated language is often needed in politics but there's really no reason to use unnecessarily convoluted terms in this case aside from pandering to triggered troons.
No, it's the other way around -- "slave" comes from the word "Slav". (Slav means "glory")

And slavery never happened in Russia? Tell this bitch to look up serfdom, sometime. My ancestors were serfs in Poland, you stupid cunt.
It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only was serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
 
Last edited:
"Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.

Even when disregarding the funny misunderstandings their stupid language gymnastics could lead to, terms like "uterus havers" and "cervix havers" aren't necessarily inclusive of everybody either. A poor immigrant housekeeper from El Salvador who doesn't speak much English, hasn't had a day of sexual education in her life and is in need of an abortion because the man of the house impregnated her is more likely to understand the word "woman" than biologically specific language like "uterus haver" or "cervix haver". Complicated language is often needed in politics but there's really no reason to use unnecessarily convoluted terms in this case aside from pandering to triggered troons.It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.

Well, considering their politics of late, they like serfdom.

It's kind of funny, though; they screech about the "gender binary" as reducing people's identities to their genitals...but what is "uterus haver" but that?
 
It's kind of funny, though; they screech about the "gender binary" as reducing people's identities to their genitals...but what is "uterus haver" but that?
Their gambit is to debase people who think in terms of biological realities. They set up the term "uterus havers" simply to denounce it. This way they put the term "women", despite it having been enucleated of any meaning, to a privileged pedestal, the focus of all their discourse, hence allowing males to stick their fingers in what are exclusively female businesses.
 
Last edited:
"Anyone with a uterus" technically, one could consider killers who kept uteruses in their freezer "uterus having people", but I don't think that's what they had in mind.

Even when disregarding the funny misunderstandings their stupid language gymnastics could lead to, terms like "uterus havers" and "cervix havers" aren't necessarily inclusive of everybody either. A poor immigrant housekeeper from El Salvador who doesn't speak much English, hasn't had a day of sexual education in her life and is in need of an abortion because the man of the house impregnated her is more likely to understand the word "woman" than biologically specific language like "uterus haver" or "cervix haver". Complicated language is often needed in politics but there's really no reason to use unnecessarily convoluted terms in this case aside from pandering to triggered troons.It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
It gets worse, they also use "birther" for pregnant women and "bleeder" for menstruating women like this is some losers dystopian novel.
 
Oh, this I know. I just think it's funny how they complain of something, while doing that precise thing, and seem completely oblivious about it.

At any rate, they should just go ahead and rename everyone who isn't a tranny "Toby," and be done with it. It's ultimately what they're seeking anyway.
 
It's actually amazing how often these social justice idiots expose themselves as ahistorical buffoons. Not only wasn't serfdom abolished way after slavery was prohibited in the United States in some countries and regions, but it sometimes had an ethnic dimension as well. For example, in Lithuania, the majority of serfs were ethnic Lithuanians while the owners were generally either ethnic Poles or Russians.
Slavery in Russia was abolished in 1861.
The really fun thing is Soviets hated to acknowledge slavery because it didn't line up with the class struggle progression theory, specifically, that it should go slaveowners vs slaves, lords vs serfs, bougies vs proles, and finally the triumph of the working man in one direction only. Russia went from serfdom to chattel slavery sometime during the 16th century.
 
It gets worse, they also use "birther" for pregnant women and "bleeder" for menstruating women like this is some losers dystopian novel.
Wait, the last time I heard that was from my gay cousin who acts like the bras in Woolworth's somehow oppress him.

What's next, they're going to slap on "Breeder" next?

Jesus fuck, these assholes use more slurs, show more bigotry, act more racist than I could easily believe.

Even a 1950's KKK member would look at them and go "Bruh, slow your roll. Damn."
 
Back