Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging


That's about as bad as one I saw the other day:
20190522_173412.jpg


Mere homosexuality is no longer enough for some. Pete isn't marching half-naked in pride parades and flying the rainbow flag and SJW-ing his ass off. Sure he's gay but he's not queer and that's problematic!
 
After an extensive passage in which LaFleur argues “whiteness can be and regularly is weaponized by white people,” LaFleur goes on to suggest that Pete and Chasten may not actually be gay:

Queer theorists and queer communities have coined terms like homonormativity to describe this effect, but this recent Time cover left me wondering: is this homonormativity? Or just heterosexuality? If straight people can be queer — as so many of them seem so impatient to explain to me — can’t gay people also be straight?
"This gay male couple isn't stereotypically faggy enough for me. Clearly, they must be lying about their sexuality"
 
It's inevitable. No matter how marginalized you are, you can't always be on the same team
Kind of like how lighter skinned PoCs will get swatted at for not being oppressed enough by their darker counterparts. Or how a fat girl will be too privlidged compared to the "deathfat" types.
 

It's quite telling that what they are looking for is the culture of queerness, such as seen during the "metrosexual" craze of the '00s, because that's what is cool and hip. Like all autists, they confuse the abstraction or the idea of the thing with the thing itself. This is why we have trans-lesbians; they still want to fuck women, but they want to be part of the cool people, so you wind up with gay or trans as political performance art to hide the fact that they're having straight sex. That way you can brag to your Twitter followers about how you're Sticking It To The (Orange) Man with all the awesome gayness you're doing.

This, essentially, is how social justice has betrayed gay people. I'd call these idiots genderpunks, but they're so authoritarian and bourgeois that it would be an insult to the word "punk".
 
It's quite telling that what they are looking for is the culture of queerness, such as seen during the "metrosexual" craze of the '00s, because that's what is cool and hip. Like all autists, they confuse the abstraction or the idea of the thing with the thing itself. This is why we have trans-lesbians; they still want to fuck women, but they want to be part of the cool people, so you wind up with gay or trans as political performance art to hide the fact that they're having straight sex. That way you can brag to your Twitter followers about how you're Sticking It To The (Orange) Man with all the awesome gayness you're doing.

This, essentially, is how social justice has betrayed gay people. I'd call these idiots genderpunks, but they're so authoritarian and bourgeois that it would be an insult to the word "punk".
I'm just wondering how much longer society is going to tolerate this bullshit before it finally tells these Neo-Hippies to fuck off.
 
It's quite telling that what they are looking for is the culture of queerness, such as seen during the "metrosexual" craze of the '00s, because that's what is cool and hip. Like all autists, they confuse the abstraction or the idea of the thing with the thing itself. This is why we have trans-lesbians; they still want to fuck women, but they want to be part of the cool people, so you wind up with gay or trans as political performance art to hide the fact that they're having straight sex. That way you can brag to your Twitter followers about how you're Sticking It To The (Orange) Man with all the awesome gayness you're doing.

This, essentially, is how social justice has betrayed gay people. I'd call these idiots genderpunks, but they're so authoritarian and bourgeois that it would be an insult to the word "punk".
Yeah, it always amuses me when you have two people doing PIV sex like rabbits and cooing over how they're so queer because they're both nonbinary (which generally seems to mean colorblind when it comes to clothing choices).
 
Yeah, it always amuses me when you have two people doing PIV sex like rabbits and cooing over how they're so queer because they're both nonbinary (which generally seems to mean colorblind when it comes to clothing choices).
It's okay that you're in a heterosexual relationship, guys. There's no actual reason to inconvenience yourselves.
 
"This gay male couple isn't stereotypically faggy enough for me. Clearly, they must be lying about their sexuality"
Imagine looking at them and thinking 'not gay enough'. They both have uncanny gayface and as a couple set off every gaydar in a 100 mile radius.

Unless one of those gay men is >40% brown, has a vagina, and is walking the other on a leash, who is clad in only a leather gimp mask and a diaper, I could never vote for them.

10 years later: they may be queer, but they're not clownfreaks.
 
Imagine looking at them and thinking 'not gay enough'. They both have uncanny gayface and as a couple set off every gaydar in a 100 mile radius.

Unless one of those gay men is >40% brown, has a vagina, and is walking the other on a leash, who is clad in only a leather gimp mask and a diaper, I could never vote for them.

10 years later: they may be queer, but they're not clownfreaks.

HONK HONK! Enjoy four more years of Trump because Pete Buttsecks isn't faggy enough for you, queers.
 
...so ugly autistic man in a dress plays game solely to make men mad that they got killed by a 'girl'? ...But is in fact just an sperg tranny. Gotcha.

Also uses the term "femoid" so I'd bet he's a former incel gone troon so he can still act incel-y as fuck, but now as a troon he's praised for it.
 
NY dept of education gives a list of what makes you a white supreeeemacist. Included are sins such as being goal-oriented, prioritizing writing skills and objectivity.
 
Back