Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

Attachments

  • unknown.png
    unknown.png
    721.9 KB · Views: 136
There was a lot of legalese and big words on this doc, but the gist of what I could get from it was that Casey is throwing another tantrum and is actually saying that Dibs rules applies here. Also, lol on citing Rekieta's channel. Hasn't Nick even said on one of his streams that Vic would heavily disapprove of what Nick is doing, insulting the opposition and riling us up? Hasn't he specifically said that he's doing this of his own accord, not because Vic asked him to? Does Casey ever provide concrete proof that alleges that Vic has asked anyone to do this, just circumstantial evidence that can easily be disproven?
 
FGO-Professor-P2PBTW said:
There was a lot of legalese and big words on this doc, but the gist of what I could get from it was that Casey is throwing another tantrum and is actually saying that Dibs rules applies here. Also, lol on citing Rekieta's channel. Hasn't Nick even said on one of his streams that Vic would heavily disapprove of what Nick is doing, insulting the opposition and riling us up? Hasn't he specifically said that he's doing this of his own accord, not because Vic asked him to? Does Casey ever provide concrete proof that alleges that Vic has asked anyone to do this, just circumstantial evidence that can easily be disproven?
Click to expand...

It reads like legalese of NAH-UH ITS HIS FAULT, I GET TO DISPOSE FIRST, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

but thats just what it seems to be to me, i could be wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: not william stenchever and Evil Bunny
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
New document, people!
The Defense filed a response to the MTQ Deposition Notice and Motion to Compel.
Erick cites Nick Rekieta in the document and his "Fear the Beard" merch, LOL!
Click to expand...
Casey has been taken notes about citing shit. Funnily enough, the thing he cites "there is no rule for who deposes first, if there was it would be the plaintiff" lol

Edit: Cougar'd by AnOminous, though is it still technically cougar'd if he beat me to it by 45 minutes and i just hadn't read that far yet?
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
Reactions: Safir, Evil Bunny and AStupidMonkey
Another obnoxious thing about this filing is that it is a response to another motion by the plaintiff, is filed immediately before a hearing three days from when it's filed, and introduces another entirely new motion even though the defendant already had a motion pending.

Since all the discovery matters are likely to be handled tomorrow, he's trying to sneak in a new motion so that the plaintiff won't have time to reply before Friday or has to make a rushed response, or there will have to be an entirely new hearing just for that new thing.

Considering the TCPA filing deadline is coming up soon, that's kind of sneaky.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Skeptical Idiot, Evil Bunny, Yuusha-sama and 12 others
D... what.
AnOminous said:
Another obnoxious thing about this filing is that it is a response to another motion by the plaintiff, is filed immediately before a hearing three days from when it's filed, and introduces another entirely new motion even though the defendant already had a motion pending.

Since all the discovery matters are likely to be handled tomorrow, he's trying to sneak in a new motion so that the plaintiff won't have time to reply before Friday or has to make a rushed response, or there will have to be an entirely new hearing just for that new thing.

Considering the TCPA filing deadline is coming up soon, that's kind of sneaky.
Click to expand...

I thought the discovery matters were going to be handled on the 31st, which is two days from now, not tomorrow?
 
AnOminous said:
Another obnoxious thing about this filing is that it is a response to another motion by the plaintiff, is filed immediately before a hearing three days from when it's filed, and introduces another entirely new motion even though the defendant already had a motion pending.

Since all the discovery matters are likely to be handled tomorrow, he's trying to sneak in a new motion so that the plaintiff won't have time to reply before Friday or has to make a rushed response, or there will have to be an entirely new hearing just for that new thing.

Considering the TCPA filing deadline is coming up soon, that's kind of sneaky.
Click to expand...
ehh kind of leaning on BHBH expecting it from Casey at this point.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Yuusha-sama, Army Burger and Recoil
AnOminous said:
Considering the TCPA filing deadline is coming up soon, that's kind of sneaky.
Click to expand...

As our in-house law expert, how would you guess the average judge's view on Casey would be right now? We don't know much about the actual judge yet so no point discussing particulars but I'm interested in knowing if Casey would look half as bad to the judge as he does to us right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Army Burger and Recoil
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back